Child is not naturally asthmatic that has been established.JR8 wrote:The mold is in the parents bedroom and not the childs. Maybe the child is naturally asthmatic, who is to say? It is tricky if NEA observations relating to the child's environment have been complied with.
It is probably safe to assume NEA is at least as knowledgeable as Terrence, don't you think?After A&E visits NEA got involved and came to do a site visit. They tested the air con, water etc and there was nothing but after pulling the parents bed away from the wall discovered a wall of Black Mold behind the bed.
How? Perhaps I am wrong but I really don't think having some "toxic" black mold is good enough to break the contract. It is like having a washing machine that is not grounded properly with the "live" phase on its casing - it can kill somebody, but even if the owner refuses to fix it you don't pack your furniture and leave but rather than this you fix it by yourself and charge the owner for all the costs.sundaymorningstaple wrote:So then, knowing whether the black mold is the crux of the problem would entail having a specialist to determine whether or not it's the problem. After knowing that, then the would want to know if they could legally break the contract.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests