ecureilx wrote:pappuu:
Just my 2 cents:
In most companies I worked for, Notice of 3 months is for those at M level or higher.
I don't know about Financial markets, so I can't comment, but in other places I worked, or had dealings, it was always 1 month
Now, even with a 3 month notice period, what makes you think they will keep her employed if she stepped on too many toes ? As I said, if she badly needed the job, she should have learnt to suck it up -alas, she didn't seem to have done it, and you are demanding something like she be employed regardless she is easy to work (or even if the boss is not easy to work with ..)
Now, even if she had a 3 month notice, there are a hundred clauses that can lead to her being terminated, with a 1 day notice. Heck, they can make up stuff, if the company is mad enough to rid her - stuff like late to work, extended lunch break, leaving early .. and .. well, browsing internet - can all be cause for immediate termination, if they really wanted her out promptly
Get over it .. that's all I can say
I heard that companies get tax/other benefits from govt if they recruit new people i.e. create employment. So they deliberately take and fire new employees often. I heard such things happening in other countries. I suspect my wife is a prey of this strategy of abusing the system. This is happening for the second time.