I suspect it will become increasingly sclerotic. SG can go on and on drilling it's citizenry about achievement and success, but there is a point (now well passed), at which hunger is gone, and complacency and entitlement sets in.ScoobyDoes wrote:Sorry, I would care......means he's a twat
Meltdown, yes I think so unless this place can really get to grips with higher efficiency and doing more with less and better people.
Immigration shouldn't be the only answer to higher GDP.
To egg you on, JR8JR8 wrote: p.s. I really do not care one way or another if a friend is a tube driver, bus drivers or CEO of RBS.
The irony is that in my experience, the people who make such statements are those who do really care. Otherwise why bother remarking on it...
There are some SG hunger and dynamism about but not enough. They are so used to being spoonfed by the govt. Square holes round pegs. I am begining to wonder if the majority of them can think outside the box.JR8 wrote: I suspect it will become increasingly sclerotic. SG can go on and on drilling it's citizenry about achievement and success, but there is a point (now well passed), at which hunger is gone, and complacency and entitlement sets in.
Any dynamism and hunger here, comes from foreigners.
Nope not NW8, who can afford to live there? Great salt beef sandwich shop thoughOhh gawd, not NW8 I hope.
I dont think SG will meltdown. If you compare this bubble with the previous bubble that burst in 2008, you will see that there are several differences.PrimroseHill wrote:I really do not care one way or another if a friend is a tube driver, bus drivers or CEO of RBS.
Just not into those with chips on their shoulders or the world owes them.
Back to the subject at hand. Is Singapore heading for a meltdown?
Consensus on what though? If everyone is standing on the tracks blind-folded, or in full "consensus" that the train is coming, they're still going to die if they're on the tracks unless they do something about it. Is there consensus on the right solution to avoid the train? Or will the 'solution' (say cooling measures) only benefit some as opposed to all when the train arrives/bubble bursts.Wd40 wrote: 1)In 2008 nobody expected the bubble to burst, it came as a shock. This time everybody is expecting it to burst. When there is so much consensus, it wont happen.
Re-inflating the market. Cooling measures are a short term fix, not a solution. Do you just keep turning them off and on trying to keep the egg balanced?Wd40 wrote: 2)The gahmen has lots of tools in its arm this time round. It can unwind all the cooling measures and suddenly you will lots of people who were priced out of the market suddenly jumping in and that will support the market
So the government will make the banks take a huge hit? Where does the money come from? I wonder how much GIC and Temasek own in each of the local banks? Maybe they can loan the banks money from CPF?Wd40 wrote: 3)The gahmen can intervene bigtime to ensure that banks get as linient as possible in terms of loan recovery. Asians are much more stigmatic about defaulting on loans than the Americans. Even if the value of the house falls below the outstanding loan amounts, I dont see Asians wanting to default like the Americans did during subprime crisis.
As others stated earlier, if there's a global meltdown, or a China blip (which probably means global meltdown nowadays), then surely Singapore will go down too. Singapore economy, equities and property has always been volatile and tied to macro factors.Wd40 wrote:I dont think SG will meltdown. If you compare this bubble with the previous bubble that burst in 2008, you will see that there are several differences.PrimroseHill wrote:I really do not care one way or another if a friend is a tube driver, bus drivers or CEO of RBS.
Just not into those with chips on their shoulders or the world owes them.
Back to the subject at hand. Is Singapore heading for a meltdown?
1)In 2008 nobody expected the bubble to burst, it came as a shock. This time everybody is expecting it to burst. When there is so much consensus, it wont happen.
2)The gahmen has lots of tools in its arm this time round. It can unwind all the cooling measures and suddenly you will lots of people who were priced out of the market suddenly jumping in and that will support the market
3)The gahmen can intervene bigtime to ensure that banks get as linient as possible in terms of loan recovery. Asians are much more stigmatic about defaulting on loans than the Americans. Even if the value of the house falls below the outstanding loan amounts, I dont see Asians wanting to default like the Americans did during subprime crisis.
Beeroclock wrote:IMO, the govt is (overall) doing a good job and has been for decades, especially when benchmarked against other neighbouring countries. Even comparing vs developed western countries for that matter, where the 3-4 year re-election cycle drives everything, Singapore has a huge advantage of staying the course and finishing what it starts. They also have the scope and authority to take unpopular but important decisions (e.g. cooling measures) unlike many Western govts who are held hostage to minorities and lobby groups.
Read this about consensus theory in investing:zzm9980 wrote:Consensus on what though? If everyone is standing on the tracks blind-folded, or in full "consensus" that the train is coming, they're still going to die if they're on the tracks unless they do something about it. Is there consensus on the right solution to avoid the train? Or will the 'solution' (say cooling measures) only benefit some as opposed to all when the train arrives/bubble bursts.Wd40 wrote: 1)In 2008 nobody expected the bubble to burst, it came as a shock. This time everybody is expecting it to burst. When there is so much consensus, it wont happen.
In the current market majority are waiting for a correction and expecting a correction. This has been the case for the last 2-3 years. When so many people wait for a correction, the correction wont come.When most investors are in consensus and are driving the market in a particular direction, one naturally thinks that the consensus will continue ad infinitum and that the best trading decision is to follow the crowd.
However, history has proven exactly the opposite. When driven strongly by consensus, crowd behavior is actually a contrary indicator. When the consensus of the majority of investors or traders is strongest, the individual trader should do exactly the opposite of what the crowd is doing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests