SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Pr and cpf question
Pr and cpf question
Hi can anyone in similar situation share your experience?
The good news is my pr just approved. The bad news is my employer is asking me to sign a new contract to adjust my basic salary because he wants me to absorb cpf contribution. My questions to you:
1) can I ask for the same salary and employer to pay 21% cpf (pr first year) ?
2) what will happen if I'm not satisfied with the new contract terms and don't sign it? Will they continue paying the "old" salary without cpf? Are they obliged to pay cpf if I don't sign the new contract?
Ps: if the above doesn't work out, should I just quit?
The good news is my pr just approved. The bad news is my employer is asking me to sign a new contract to adjust my basic salary because he wants me to absorb cpf contribution. My questions to you:
1) can I ask for the same salary and employer to pay 21% cpf (pr first year) ?
2) what will happen if I'm not satisfied with the new contract terms and don't sign it? Will they continue paying the "old" salary without cpf? Are they obliged to pay cpf if I don't sign the new contract?
Ps: if the above doesn't work out, should I just quit?
- sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
- Posts: 39755
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
I take it you filed for PR without having his sponsorship via Annex A? As you circumvented your application past him, he is probably a bit perturbed that you just increased is cost of operation without his approval. Therefore, what I see is that you will probably sign it or lose your job. So, you can quit or wait for the axe to fall. I mean, after all, you just whacked him for an additional $$450~$825 in payroll costs per month, assuming you earn more than $5K/mo.
I'm afraid I wouldn't blame him if you were shown the door if you don't sign the new contract. You should have cleared your application and consequences with the employer before you applied.
I'm afraid I wouldn't blame him if you were shown the door if you don't sign the new contract. You should have cleared your application and consequences with the employer before you applied.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
But boy could you make a stink on Stomp and really get a lot of locals pissed at your employer, if they can connect the dots and figure out that he is paying foreigners more than he would pay a local.
I would suggest to just do it as long as the new contract is identical with the exception of the CPF contribution difference.
I would suggest to just do it as long as the new contract is identical with the exception of the CPF contribution difference.
Well SMS, operation cost is an issue but I'm unable to see how that was "circumvented". I got it on my own merit. Besides Isn't that companies love to have PRs, how do I otherwise see bunch of job posts out there with disclaimer "Singaporean and PRs only"?
Would I need to inform them when I surrender my work pass? If I continue working and get paid without cpf, would that be a violation of law by the employer?
Would I need to inform them when I surrender my work pass? If I continue working and get paid without cpf, would that be a violation of law by the employer?
Check your job contract, in most circumstances you would be obliged to notify the employer of changes in immigration situationsXavierx wrote: Would I need to inform them when I surrender my work pass?
You would not only be getting the employer in trouble but yourself.... you would not be paying CPF on your earnings which puts you in a tight position with the government / CPF board / IRAS.Xavierx wrote: If I continue working and get paid without cpf, would that be a violation of law by the employer?
Yes PR's are preferred but that does not mean they are willing to accept YOU with your increased cost to the company.Xavierx wrote: Besides Isn't that companies love to have PRs, how do I otherwise see bunch of job posts out there with disclaimer "Singaporean and PRs only"?
You need to convince the employer your skills are valuable and that you deserve the increased expense he will incur.
If you cannot them you need to accept the pay cut.
P.S. A lot of big names / MNC's in Singapore have a standard HR clause that says your pay is inclusive of CPF and if you become eligible to pay CPF the total enumeration would remain the same (i.e. Your total take home = Salary - CPF).[/u]
If you did not tell him in advance, that was the circumvention...Xavierx wrote:Well SMS, operation cost is an issue but I'm unable to see how that was "circumvented". I got it on my own merit. Besides Isn't that companies love to have PRs, how do I otherwise see bunch of job posts out there with disclaimer "Singaporean and PRs only"?
Would I need to inform them when I surrender my work pass? If I continue working and get paid without cpf, would that be a violation of law by the employer?
Companies like to have PRs and SCs, but many do not want to pay extra for employing them. That is one of the major problems, actually; I still do not understand why SCs are more expensive than PRs are more expensive than EPs/S-Pass to employ. It seems to run contrary to the gov's goal of employers giving preference to SCs before PRs before foreigners.
I guess your choices are:
1) Sign the thing as is, take the (disposable) salary cut, and look for a new job as soon as possible if you can find a job that pays better.
2) Don't sign, and probably find yourself out of a job soon. You may be able to force the employer to continue employing you on your old salary, but that will most likely lead to him firing you very soon - note that you can always be terminated at a month's notice here (or whatever your contract says) without any reason given.
3) Try to negotiate a solution that is acceptable to both of you, presumably somewhere in the middle.
Yes, as soon as you are PR, your employer will have to pay your CPF while you are employed there, or risk breaking the law. However, prosecution in that area is not too strong.
I am not sure how long you have been in Singapore, but you should know that employees have no rights here other than what is written in the contract. This applies to your situation as well.
Companies love to have PRs because there is no minimum pay. They can pay peanuts to PRs, whereas EP holders, for pass approval need to have certain minimum pay. So you are completely wrong as to why they love PRs and SGns.Xavierx wrote:Well SMS, operation cost is an issue but I'm unable to see how that was "circumvented". I got it on my own merit. Besides Isn't that companies love to have PRs, how do I otherwise see bunch of job posts out there with disclaimer "Singaporean and PRs only"?
Would I need to inform them when I surrender my work pass? If I continue working and get paid without cpf, would that be a violation of law by the employer?
Read your contract again. From, what I know most contract will say that if you immigration status changes then contract terms change or they explicitly specify that employers contribution to CPF is also part of the salary that they are giving you as a take home. This is very common in employment contracts of IT staffing companies.
- nakatago
- Moderator
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: Sister Margaret’s School for Wayward Children
* To cater to the locals' entitlement complexAngMoG wrote: Companies like to have PRs and SCs, but many do not want to pay extra for employing them. That is one of the major problems, actually; I still do not understand why SCs are more expensive than PRs are more expensive than EPs/S-Pass to employ. It seems to run contrary to the gov's goal of employers giving preference to SCs before PRs before foreigners.
* CPF
* Foreigners are easier to lure with less money if they come from less-affluent countries. A lot of companies pay based on what a person's worth in his home country if from less affluent countries rather than what he's worth, period.
"A quokka is what would happen if there was an anime about kangaroos."
-
- Reporter
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 2:51 pm
Regarding the 1st year PR contribution rate, I think at most you could hope for the graduated scale, which is 9% total (5% employee / 4% employer) and with the cap per $5k monthly salary.
Per CPF website "CPF contributions are payable at graduated rates once a foreign employee becomes a SPR. During the employee’s first two years of obtaining SPR status, they and their employers have the option to jointly apply to CPF Board to contribute at higher prescribed rates."
Since the 1st year PR full rate (i.e. the 21% total contribution you mentioned) requires your employer's agreement for the joint application to cpf, it doesn't sound likely that's going to happen.
Per CPF website "CPF contributions are payable at graduated rates once a foreign employee becomes a SPR. During the employee’s first two years of obtaining SPR status, they and their employers have the option to jointly apply to CPF Board to contribute at higher prescribed rates."
Since the 1st year PR full rate (i.e. the 21% total contribution you mentioned) requires your employer's agreement for the joint application to cpf, it doesn't sound likely that's going to happen.
Not sure how it caters to the locals' entitlement complex if their net salary is lower than the net salary of a foreign colleague earning the same gross salary as they do...nakatago wrote:* To cater to the locals' entitlement complexAngMoG wrote: Companies like to have PRs and SCs, but many do not want to pay extra for employing them. That is one of the major problems, actually; I still do not understand why SCs are more expensive than PRs are more expensive than EPs/S-Pass to employ. It seems to run contrary to the gov's goal of employers giving preference to SCs before PRs before foreigners.
* CPF
* Foreigners are easier to lure with less money if they come from less-affluent countries. A lot of companies pay based on what a person's worth in his home country if from less affluent countries rather than what he's worth, period.

- nakatago
- Moderator
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: Sister Margaret’s School for Wayward Children
guy from third world country = just as skilled, if not more but willing to work for less moneyAngMoG wrote:Not sure how it caters to the locals' entitlement complex if their net salary is lower than the net salary of a foreign colleague earning the same gross salary as they do...nakatago wrote:* To cater to the locals' entitlement complexAngMoG wrote: Companies like to have PRs and SCs, but many do not want to pay extra for employing them. That is one of the major problems, actually; I still do not understand why SCs are more expensive than PRs are more expensive than EPs/S-Pass to employ. It seems to run contrary to the gov's goal of employers giving preference to SCs before PRs before foreigners.
* CPF
* Foreigners are easier to lure with less money if they come from less-affluent countries. A lot of companies pay based on what a person's worth in his home country if from less affluent countries rather than what he's worth, period.
guy from first world country = just as skilled, if not more worth the higher price tag but will probably brought in on a local package without the whinging.
"A quokka is what would happen if there was an anime about kangaroos."
-
- Reporter
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 2:51 pm
I guess many will calculate like this, but it's important to remember the cpf while restricted is still your money. It's not a "net" salary deduction in the sense of tax. So while the SC's "disposable" salary is lower than a foreign colleague earning same gross salary, they are retaining the difference as forced savings for retirement and earning a very good interest rate for Singapore.AngMoG wrote:Not sure how it caters to the locals' entitlement complex if their net salary is lower than the net salary of a foreign colleague earning the same gross salary as they do... Razz
- sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
- Posts: 39755
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
Which is why, in the first reply to the OP, I said his additional cost to the company will be from $450~$825 a month assuming his basic salary is over $5K/mo. 9% x 5K = $450 9posts so far saying everything that I said, with nothing new at all, but just using a lot more words.Beeroclock wrote:Regarding the 1st year PR contribution rate, I think at most you could hope for the graduated scale, which is 9% total (5% employee / 4% employer) and with the cap per $5k monthly salary.
Per CPF website "CPF contributions are payable at graduated rates once a foreign employee becomes a SPR. During the employee’s first two years of obtaining SPR status, they and their employers have the option to jointly apply to CPF Board to contribute at higher prescribed rates."
Since the 1st year PR full rate (i.e. the 21% total contribution you mentioned) requires your employer's agreement for the joint application to cpf, it doesn't sound likely that's going to happen.

The way I see it, he couldn't be stuffed to find out something simple like this, how do ya except him to decipher all the additional garbage.

I like the KISS method.

SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
- Reporter
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 2:51 pm
I've taken a hard look at my contract and nowhere in the fine print mentions about my salary upon pr approval. My base is around 6k. But you are right, graduated rate applies for 1st year pr. This means 5% from me and 4% employer and capped at 450$. Effectively "additional operation cost" for my boss would be just 250$. Ok, my conspiracy theory is that he might be willing to swallow this until he has to pay 21%
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 2427 Views
-
Last post by TropicalExpat
Mon, 31 Aug 2020 1:39 pm
-
-
Can a PR buy a condominium with a loan and CPF?
by NOWAR » Sat, 26 May 2018 12:47 pm » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 5 Replies
- 2589 Views
-
Last post by BBCDoc
Sat, 26 May 2018 9:25 pm
-
-
-
PR Surrendering and CPF Withdrawl
by cherry25 » Mon, 05 Nov 2018 1:21 pm » in PR, Citizenship, Passes & Visas for Foreigners - 2 Replies
- 2767 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Fri, 09 Nov 2018 9:47 am
-
-
-
How does CPF life and cancelling PR work?
by PNGMK » Tue, 08 Jan 2019 10:42 am » in PR, Citizenship, Passes & Visas for Foreigners - 4 Replies
- 2317 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Fri, 25 Jan 2019 7:54 pm
-
-
-
PR Renunciation and CPF Withdrawal
by whacka » Tue, 06 Aug 2019 5:07 pm » in PR, Citizenship, Passes & Visas for Foreigners - 2 Replies
- 2805 Views
-
Last post by Mad Scientist
Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:27 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: PartyLike-A-Russian, Remrt and 13 guests