Probably a more accurate description .

This guy doesn't make any sense at all and once you correct him then his whole story changes. I doubt if he's out of Secondary school yet.
In like number 7, since I quite find the opposite to be true. 'Chewing on Wasps' as I learned from this forummorenangpinay wrote:http://mothership.sg/2013/12/12-comment ... escending/
praising the hero...or not.![]()
12 comments praising Little India riot ‘hero’ that are in fact unbelievably condescending
Too many Singaporeans think too highly of themselves. If there's such a thing as superiority complex, they have it.zzm9980 wrote:In like number 7, since I quite find the opposite to be true. 'Chewing on Wasps' as I learned from this forummorenangpinay wrote:http://mothership.sg/2013/12/12-comment ... escending/
praising the hero...or not.![]()
12 comments praising Little India riot ‘hero’ that are in fact unbelievably condescending
Yeah, that is the argument I think I've been reading a bit the past week. I can't quite tell though because it seems to be too complex for most of those making it to properly articulate.JR8 wrote:I think the suggestion was:
- 'Sub-Conti' Labour should be pathetically grateful to work in SG at all.
- Therefore how they are treated is irrelevant.
... but I'm not sure.
I was trying to coax him out ;
... I'm fast giving up hope of getting any sense out of this
i agree with you .JR8 wrote:I think the suggestion was:
------
- 'Sub-Conti' Labour should be pathetically grateful to work in SG at all.
- Therefore how they are treated is irrelevant.'
------
... but I'm not sure.
I was trying to coax him out ;
... I'm fast giving up hope of getting any sense out of this
- Edit for punctuation/clarity.
firegold 99 wrote:i agree with you .JR8 wrote:I think the suggestion was:
------
- 'Sub-Conti' Labour should be pathetically grateful to work in SG at all.
- Therefore how they are treated is irrelevant.'
------
... but I'm not sure.
I was trying to coax him out ;
... I'm fast giving up hope of getting any sense out of this
- Edit for punctuation/clarity.
@ sundaymorningstaple ,
If go to my workplace/VWO , if you sit my company transport (private free bus), you will understand what i meant because the bus driver is a mainland Chinese (many of my clients said the bus turn here and turn there) in my company which our Singapore Ministers/Lee Hsien Loong had been debating about foreign talents and foreigners in the new reports on channel new asia. A lot of people will complain about foreigner driver than a local one as they have communication barriers. (This is what people fear about foreign talent)
If you go out , you probably know what i meant .
off-topic - It is none of your business to know about my personal information, lifestyle and etc .
@ zzm9980 This is a complex issue
1. Transport arrangement between foreigner and locals
2. business shop owners not making money ,ban alcohol ;need to sell it , rental cost high
3. rumours made by public
I do believe JR8 is only one right and i fully agree with him.
@JR8 I also referring we are under British government , then after that we have Japanese Occupation as you mentioned that is why i agree with you but it a complex issue as what zzm998 mentioned .
Ironic, as that's the problem I'm having here. I don't know how to respond to your post because it is just vague enough due to missing words or improper grammar that I'm not sure what you're saying. Your points could go a few different ways.A lot of people will complain about foreigner driver than a local one as they have communication barriers. (This is what people fear about foreign talent)
firegold 99 wrote: I do believe JR8 is only one right and i fully agree with him.
Sorry i have disagree , People on SGForum probably will said THE SAME THING . As a moderator , you shouldn't tell people what to post and they can agree and disagree in this forum as i said earlier in my previous post , you are one who disgrace yourself as being a moderator, i do not want to comment about your moderating issue but i have to . You shouldn't be a moderator .sundaymorningstaple wrote:The bus involved in the accident, both the driver and the timekeeper, from what I understand were Singaporeans. Not PRC or other foreigners. Might help to get your ducks in order and English grammar sorted out so we can guess at what you are trying to say as you keep changing as is a local habit when current position is no longer tenable.You should have probably stayed on SGForums.
I am not being racist or anything but these is facts and i am not narrow minded, it is the perception of people opinions . You make me sound like one of PAP MP Vivian Balakrishnan repeating the things over and over again . Let take a look : http://youtu.be/vFnEM80XAOMthe lynx wrote:I give up with firegold. He obviously had cognitive dissonance and he presents not just embarrassing flawed arguments, but also very narrow tunnel of perceptions and rationalism that even his/ her fellow countrymen/ countrywomen would be find it a chagrin.
I'm sorry but I have better things to do over the weekend.
firegold 99 wrote:
- As to mention , yes it is a complex issue and a very difficult one, therefore many Singapore ministers will have to go on to parliament or interview reports from channel new asia .
You also need to learn READ ! Copy & Paste from previous postAngMoG wrote:My advice @firegold 99 :
1) Learn proper English
2) AFTERWARDS come back and post again, when you can express what you want to express
But from what I can glean, you are trying to spout some nonsense, some of it apparently borderline xenophobic/racist, but to what end I cannot surmise.
firegold 99 wrote:
- As to mention , yes it is a complex issue and a very difficult one, therefore many Singapore ministers will have to go on to parliament or interview reports from channel new asia .So ministers have to go to parliament and on TV because it is a complex issue?!
Reminds of: the sky is green, because yogurt does not have any bones.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests