I'd suggest that if you're business grows your move away from the 'services' providers and hire professionals to manage your company with you.SeriousQ wrote:Thank you, Super Eagle, for sharing. I may have to change my Company Secretary/Accounting agency as they seem unwilling to share any advice (despite their ad claims), which makes me quite frustrated not knowing where to turn.
My family expat but I maintain Singapore citizenship after much consideration.
Thus far, in my bookkeeping to the agency to prepare the Balance Sheet, I post Director's Fees & Director's Salary under "EXPENSES". This reduces the corporate tax as well. May I presume that Dividends are also posted similarly - under EXPENSES? Before reading this forum, I thought I had to post all profit take-outs under "Director's Fees". That would surely result in a high personal tax bracket. So to avoid this instant jump in personal income tax, I only need to take out my profits under Dividends and not Directors Fee?
I've asked this question (on profit-taking options) to many accountants but their replies have not been coherent. The last reply from the same agency I hire, was to splurge the profit on buying company equipment and to expense more if I wish to reduce corporate tax or personal income tax - a pathetic answer if you wish to preserve cash flow for future expansion or other growth needs.
Thanks for pointers on copyright as well. I dig out that article again. Title: Photographer wins $1.2 million from companies that took pictures off Twitter
They really trip up over there.
SeriousQ wrote:Thank you, Super Eagle, for sharing. I may have to change my Company Secretary/Accounting agency as they seem unwilling to share any advice (despite their ad claims), which makes me quite frustrated not knowing where to turn.
My family expat but I maintain Singapore citizenship after much consideration.
Thus far, in my bookkeeping to the agency to prepare the Balance Sheet, I post Director's Fees & Director's Salary under "EXPENSES". This reduces the corporate tax as well. May I presume that Dividends are also posted similarly - under EXPENSES? Before reading this forum, I thought I had to post all profit take-outs under "Director's Fees". That would surely result in a high personal tax bracket. So to avoid this instant jump in personal income tax, I only need to take out my profits under Dividends and not Directors Fee?
I've asked this question (on profit-taking options) to many accountants but their replies have not been coherent. The last reply from the same agency I hire, was to splurge the profit on buying company equipment and to expense more if I wish to reduce corporate tax or personal income tax - a pathetic answer if you wish to preserve cash flow for future expansion or other growth needs.
Thanks for pointers on copyright as well. I dig out that article again. Title: Photographer wins $1.2 million from companies that took pictures off Twitter
They really trip up over there.
I'm with PNGMK on this one: You need a better accountant/secretary... and and a good CPA can do that and should be able to explain all the options. It sounds like you have real morons serving you. And if you are large enough to hire one internally, get a knowledgeable person that can also act as bookkeeper.PNGMK wrote:I'd suggest that if you're business grows your move away from the 'services' providers and hire professionals to manage your company with you.SeriousQ wrote:Thank you, Super Eagle, for sharing. I may have to change my Company Secretary/Accounting agency as they seem unwilling to share any advice (despite their ad claims), which makes me quite frustrated not knowing where to turn.
My family expat but I maintain Singapore citizenship after much consideration.
Thus far, in my bookkeeping to the agency to prepare the Balance Sheet, I post Director's Fees & Director's Salary under "EXPENSES". This reduces the corporate tax as well. May I presume that Dividends are also posted similarly - under EXPENSES? Before reading this forum, I thought I had to post all profit take-outs under "Director's Fees". That would surely result in a high personal tax bracket. So to avoid this instant jump in personal income tax, I only need to take out my profits under Dividends and not Directors Fee?
I've asked this question (on profit-taking options) to many accountants but their replies have not been coherent. The last reply from the same agency I hire, was to splurge the profit on buying company equipment and to expense more if I wish to reduce corporate tax or personal income tax - a pathetic answer if you wish to preserve cash flow for future expansion or other growth needs.
Thanks for pointers on copyright as well. I dig out that article again. Title: Photographer wins $1.2 million from companies that took pictures off Twitter
They really trip up over there.
The UK gov't went after a couple who ran their own Ltd company and paid themselves mainly via dividends. They made a case that the salary+dividends were optimally structured to pay the least amount of tax possible.Strong Eagle wrote:The US government will not allow this if the salary paid doesn't meet certain standard minimums. For example, if you were running a company with 20 employees, bringing in 6 million in revenue per year, the IRS would want to see that your salary was in line with others running that size business... so you would not be allowed to pay yourself $20,000 and then take another $150,000 in dividends. You might have to pay yourself $100,000 and take $50,000 in dividends.
Wish the govt bodies concerned made this more specific. I did enquire this same topic with several govt bodies but replies were non-specific with no one willing to give a ballpark figure or scale. They didn't object when I asked if salary could be at a minimum with the pay-out in director's fee at a maximum. One define director's fee as fees paid only to sit on board meetings and look after company affairs, while another says it all depends on the company how the allocation should go. Looks like I've got to recheck again. I once thought this should be down in the govt bodies' guidelines, found none and so email them in order to get a more definitive advice. However, in response to my email, the reply came via phone call.. the personnel wouldn't email. They have tape-recordings of all calls but not sure how that helps in case scenario above occurs.aster wrote:The UK gov't went after a couple who ran their own Ltd company and paid themselves mainly via dividends. They made a case that the salary+dividends were optimally structured to pay the least amount of tax possible.Strong Eagle wrote:The US government will not allow this if the salary paid doesn't meet certain standard minimums. For example, if you were running a company with 20 employees, bringing in 6 million in revenue per year, the IRS would want to see that your salary was in line with others running that size business... so you would not be allowed to pay yourself $20,000 and then take another $150,000 in dividends. You might have to pay yourself $100,000 and take $50,000 in dividends.
I can't remember if they blocked the accounts, but there was even mention of their house being at risk in all this. Either way, it didn't matter as the court blasted the case out the window and the goons who thought they would shake the couple down for extra money and fines got ripped for going after honest citizens who have followed the law to the letter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests