SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Moving from Singapore
-
- Regular
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:28 am
- Location: SG
I am sure that if you look at the US, there are states that will forever rely on both the influx of money from other wealthier states, and on the availability of opportunities elsewhere for their more ambitious residents. I don't see New Yorkers demanding North Dakota out of the union because it isn't contributing enough towards the union.
Whether the EU is a worthy project or not is actually a interesting debate. To reduce it all to a silly little (but incessant) rant on thieves and drug users abusing the system is as simplistic as it is pathetic.
Whether the EU is a worthy project or not is actually a interesting debate. To reduce it all to a silly little (but incessant) rant on thieves and drug users abusing the system is as simplistic as it is pathetic.
-
- Regular
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:28 am
- Location: SG
I don't think the system must be shot down because there are half a dozen Romanians living in Chelsea. Even if there are 100 Romanians living in Chelsea (which I find hard to believe) you seem to prefer the pleasure of kicking their undeserving butts back to wherever they came from rather than looking at the benefits of free movement. Like the Daily Mail, you chose to only look at the gypsies. We have companies settling all over the continent following cheaper labour. We have thousands of skilled and unskilled workers living away from their home countries. We even have our own Snowbirds, buying their houses along the Mediterranean. Part of the problem in Europe is the fact that Europeans all seem to think they're all so different. I say we're all a lot alike - this free movement should help everyone see that.
Have a further read on the money many economists are saying Britain would save by toughening their immigration and benefits laws as Cameron is proposing. It doesn't seem to be much, and certainly should not be worth the blow to the country's image.
Have a further read on the money many economists are saying Britain would save by toughening their immigration and benefits laws as Cameron is proposing. It doesn't seem to be much, and certainly should not be worth the blow to the country's image.
I don't think the system must be shot down because there are half a dozen Romanians living in Chelsea. Even if there are 100 Romanians living in Chelsea (which I find hard to believe).
That wasn’t my question
I asked: ‘So why should Romanian gypsies be paid to move to England, or Paris, or where ever, so they can be given big houses in the likes of Kensington and 'free everything'?
you seem to prefer the pleasure of kicking their undeserving butts back to wherever they came from rather than looking at the benefits of free movement.
I’m not enjoying anything barring not wishing to support employable scroungers, that end up with a better standard of living than decent hard-working families.
Part of the problem in Europe is the fact that Europeans all seem to think they're all so different. I say we're all a lot alike - this free movement should help everyone see that.
I disagree, we are very unalike. Your statement is as meretricious as suggesting Thais are actually really like Cambodians, just they don’t know, but now thanks to their politicians, they will overlook thousands of years of regional history, and soon see the errors of their past [everyone smile now, and just hand over $5k in additional taxes to sponsor this idea].
Have a further read on the money many economists are saying Britain would save by toughening their immigration and benefits laws as Cameron is proposing. It doesn't seem to be much, and certainly should not be worth the blow to the country's image.
It’s image in who's eyes? And why I should I be made to pay for it to be otherwise?
The EU is a lie, a lie foisted on the people via planned progressive deception (ref: Jean Monnet etc)
BTW what’s your motive? You’re clearly fully signed up to the programme.
That wasn’t my question

I asked: ‘So why should Romanian gypsies be paid to move to England, or Paris, or where ever, so they can be given big houses in the likes of Kensington and 'free everything'?
you seem to prefer the pleasure of kicking their undeserving butts back to wherever they came from rather than looking at the benefits of free movement.
I’m not enjoying anything barring not wishing to support employable scroungers, that end up with a better standard of living than decent hard-working families.
Part of the problem in Europe is the fact that Europeans all seem to think they're all so different. I say we're all a lot alike - this free movement should help everyone see that.
I disagree, we are very unalike. Your statement is as meretricious as suggesting Thais are actually really like Cambodians, just they don’t know, but now thanks to their politicians, they will overlook thousands of years of regional history, and soon see the errors of their past [everyone smile now, and just hand over $5k in additional taxes to sponsor this idea].
Have a further read on the money many economists are saying Britain would save by toughening their immigration and benefits laws as Cameron is proposing. It doesn't seem to be much, and certainly should not be worth the blow to the country's image.
It’s image in who's eyes? And why I should I be made to pay for it to be otherwise?
The EU is a lie, a lie foisted on the people via planned progressive deception (ref: Jean Monnet etc)
BTW what’s your motive? You’re clearly fully signed up to the programme.
-
- Chatter
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 9:44 pm
My 2 cents worth - I think that state benefits whether it is dole/back to work/job seekers should be scrapped. It was a post-war initiative to get the country and its people moving again. So once the dole is scrapped, together with it all the benefits - free dental, free eye test, housing benefit, free council tax etc etc.
Incapacity benefit should remain; however, rather than the rules prescribed by the govt, something sensible and common sense should prevail. The MS and blind person should not have their benefit cut, it should be the people pretending to be handicapped those should be cut.
NHS - something should be done. I agree that some sort of a NHS should remain, however, it should not be a postal code lottery in terms of medicine. And foreigners and tourists should not be given access to free NHS, not even A&E.
Pension - wtf. Caps on how much each person can save annually and the entire pot? Tax on withdrawal? Tax, tax tax.
Immigration - OG
Incapacity benefit should remain; however, rather than the rules prescribed by the govt, something sensible and common sense should prevail. The MS and blind person should not have their benefit cut, it should be the people pretending to be handicapped those should be cut.
NHS - something should be done. I agree that some sort of a NHS should remain, however, it should not be a postal code lottery in terms of medicine. And foreigners and tourists should not be given access to free NHS, not even A&E.
Pension - wtf. Caps on how much each person can save annually and the entire pot? Tax on withdrawal? Tax, tax tax.
Immigration - OG
-
- Regular
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:28 am
- Location: SG
Aren't you two, two peas in a pod. 
This is an ideological discussion, which, while not making it any less interesting, does make it largely academic.
I sit on the opposite side of the fence. I believe the Romanians and swindlers you speak of are the exception, not the rule. Considering the number of people who are genuinely helped by these benefits, an amount of wastage is unavoidable. I too am enraged by cheats, but would rather blame the cheats, not the system.
Within reason, i guess I've always been on the "Haves" side. I am convinced I have a duty to contribute towards the "Have-nots", even if in the process I am helping a couple of crafty Romanians move into a house I cannot afford myself.

This is an ideological discussion, which, while not making it any less interesting, does make it largely academic.
I sit on the opposite side of the fence. I believe the Romanians and swindlers you speak of are the exception, not the rule. Considering the number of people who are genuinely helped by these benefits, an amount of wastage is unavoidable. I too am enraged by cheats, but would rather blame the cheats, not the system.
Within reason, i guess I've always been on the "Haves" side. I am convinced I have a duty to contribute towards the "Have-nots", even if in the process I am helping a couple of crafty Romanians move into a house I cannot afford myself.
Well said.kookaburrah wrote:The Brit indeed does not speak for the overwhelming proportion of Europeans. In fact, nowadays Brits are Europeans by accident only, and even that seems to horrify them beyond words.
I see the open borders as a great improvement, and one much more profound than what JR8 describes. In the continent (and Ireland) the movement of people has increased immensely, especially of young professionals - many of my friends are scattered around Europe whereas 10 years ago they'd all be pretty much confined to one place. In many ways, it reminds me of the US, where people (particularly young professionals) move about from one state to another in search of new opportunities. I see it becoming as natural and widespread in Europe.
Oh and people DO move south on account of those 7 days of rain. ALL the time (and from the UK as well!)

The UK is unfortunately losing its voice in Europe, with those in power choosing to start petty little arguments for political gains alone (from the lowest ends of society). The UK knows it's place is in Europe, that's where the majority of its trade is done (not China, not the US), in truth the country would even benefit from being part of the Euro-zone. But politics and lobbying by the global banking machine will prevent that from happening in the immediate future. Shame, really, because I used to recall one Pound being worth 2 Euros. Now it's like 1:1.2. Pretty soon the Pound will become the Euro, just with different looking banknotes and coins...
The less boundaries the better - the fact that people can move around the continent, live where they want, study where they want, work where they want, is a great achievement for Europe as a whole. Even the US does not enjoy such privileges as students from a different state even are charged as if they were foreigners.
Today the EU leads the world in many areas. It is the richest place on the planet and is also the world's largest economy by GDP. Need I mention human rights as well?
I lived in "Bruxelles" for one year and loved it. You have to live IN Belgium for some time for it to grow on you.AngMoG wrote:I have to say the Brit does not speak for "most EU'ers"JR8 wrote:Phhhh ...
By all means. Most of us EU'ers wouldn't bother going even for a weekend...
Though frankly, Belgium is not the most interesting place to be, and Brussels was the only place I ever got my wallet stolen.
-
- Chatter
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 9:44 pm
I do agree with this. I do believe that the UK would benefit from joining the EUR.aster wrote:Well said.kookaburrah wrote:The Brit indeed does not speak for the overwhelming proportion of Europeans. In fact, nowadays Brits are Europeans by accident only, and even that seems to horrify them beyond words.
I see the open borders as a great improvement, and one much more profound than what JR8 describes. In the continent (and Ireland) the movement of people has increased immensely, especially of young professionals - many of my friends are scattered around Europe whereas 10 years ago they'd all be pretty much confined to one place. In many ways, it reminds me of the US, where people (particularly young professionals) move about from one state to another in search of new opportunities. I see it becoming as natural and widespread in Europe.
Oh and people DO move south on account of those 7 days of rain. ALL the time (and from the UK as well!)
The UK is unfortunately losing its voice in Europe, with those in power choosing to start petty little arguments for political gains alone (from the lowest ends of society). The UK knows it's place is in Europe, that's where the majority of its trade is done (not China, not the US), in truth the country would even benefit from being part of the Euro-zone. But politics and lobbying by the global banking machine will prevent that from happening in the immediate future. Shame, really, because I used to recall one Pound being worth 2 Euros. Now it's like 1:1.2. Pretty soon the Pound will become the Euro, just with different looking banknotes and coins...
The less boundaries the better - the fact that people can move around the continent, live where they want, study where they want, work where they want, is a great achievement for Europe as a whole. Even the US does not enjoy such privileges as students from a different state even are charged as if they were foreigners.
Today the EU leads the world in many areas. It is the richest place on the planet and is also the world's largest economy by GDP. Need I mention human rights as well?
Less boundaries the better.
I just hate the scavengers. and the cheats.
Quite, and I'm not attempting to. However my opinion is probably representative of a majority of 'Brits'. [In the spirit of pan-Eu harmony I hope you won't mind if I refer to you as 'The Kraut' in futureaster wrote:The Brit indeed does not speak for the overwhelming proportion of Europeans.

The UK joined the EU (then EEC) via political deception. It went to a referendum in 1973 and Ted Heath extolled the virtues of this free trade block, that meant you could' travel anywhere in Europe without a passport'. Of course the superstate and all it's bells and sinecures followed quietly right behind.aster wrote:In fact, nowadays Brits are Europeans by accident only, and even that seems to horrify them beyond words.
You don't seem to realise that most 'Brits' do not want to be a part of the EU.
Not in my experience. I've been letting property in London for 17-20 years, and I don't see an increase in the proportion of EU tenants. If I did, as a businessman, you'd expect me to be supporting it, and hailing it with open arms, but I don't.aster wrote:I see the open borders as a great improvement, and one much more profound than what JR8 describes. In the continent (and Ireland) the movement of people has increased immensely, especially of young professionals - many of my friends are scattered around Europe whereas 10 years ago they'd all be pretty much confined to one place.
Yes, the continentals must be so sad about that. After all they historically are such good neighbours (not).aster wrote:The UK is unfortunately losing its voice in Europe, with those in power choosing to start petty little arguments for political gains alone (from the lowest ends of society).
And yes the 'petty little arguments' from the 'lowest end of society', don't you just hate that. Democracy sucks you know. Much more convenient being millionaire socialists, and just sending the tanks in.
Yes, Germany would see it as under it's jackboot lolaster wrote:The UK knows it's place is in Europe, that's where the majority of its trade is done

Oh and - In August 2013, exports of goods to countries outside of the European Union (EU) increased by £0.7 billion to £12.3 billion. Exports to countries within the EU decreased by £0.4 billion over the same period to £12.8 billion. -
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/uktrade/u ... -2013.html
A pretty slim majority considering proximity?
aster wrote:(not China, not the US), in truth the country would even benefit from being part of the Euro-zone. But politics and lobbying by the global banking machine will prevent that from happening in the immediate future. Shame, really, because I used to recall one Pound being worth 2 Euros. Now it's like 1:1.2. Pretty soon the Pound will become the Euro, just with different looking banknotes and coins...
Are you suggesting it would be better to be like say, Greece? In a once in a generation economic death-spiral from which it might never recover, all because it is in the euro, which it cannot adjust in any way to suit it's circumstances?
You're doing a pretty good job in demonstrating why 'the Brits' don't want to join the euro, I mean just listen to yourself for a few minutes.
They could do that before the EU came about.aster wrote:The less boundaries the better - the fact that people can move around the continent, live where they want, study where they want, work where they want, is a great achievement for Europe as a whole.
-
- Chatter
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 9:44 pm
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Moving to Singapore - question about moving furniture
by nomadposters » Mon, 14 Jan 2019 4:26 am » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 1 Replies
- 2500 Views
-
Last post by abbby
Mon, 09 Sep 2019 9:53 pm
-
-
-
moving from Hong Kong to Singapore in Jan 2017
by peter.Co » Sun, 24 Jun 2018 5:03 pm » in Newcomer's Lounge - 0 Replies
- 5410 Views
-
Last post by peter.Co
Sun, 24 Jun 2018 5:03 pm
-
-
-
Moving to Singapore to attend Duke-NUS; Possibility of getting PR for lower tuition?
by sibby_44 » Mon, 12 Feb 2018 4:59 pm » in Relocating, Moving to Singapore - 1 Replies
- 2865 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 6:53 am
-
-
-
Moving to Singapore as a spouse
by Jcloiseau » Sun, 18 Feb 2018 3:43 am » in Careers & Jobs in Singapore - 4 Replies
- 1769 Views
-
Last post by Jcloiseau
Mon, 19 Feb 2018 7:22 am
-
-
-
Moving from Canada to Singapore
by john378 » Mon, 05 Mar 2018 4:09 pm » in Relocating, Moving to Singapore - 6 Replies
- 9259 Views
-
Last post by bcheng74
Sat, 31 Mar 2018 10:24 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests