This is like Bambi.singapore eagle wrote: My experience is that people are nice here.
Well I have, and maintain the impression that SMS has. You of course have not lived abroad '30 years in NY or London'... so what value your counter-opinion (as defined by your own terms)?singapore eagle wrote: I mean this in the kindest possible way, but I wonder if you would feel differently about Singapore if you had the counterfactual of living and working for 30 years in NY or London or some other big city?
Bet you were happy you didn't go to the away game on SundaySteve1960 wrote: I was at White Hart Lane weekend before last. We lost but it was so nice to be back in the stadium watching a game
I can't think of much yobbery that wouldn't be a crime here!sundaymorningstaple wrote:I worked in downtown Washington DC for probably 10 years before Singapore. So I have had experience in large cities as well. Note: That city DID have crime. I worked there when they tried to burn it down back in the 70's. Yobbery is not a crime, by the way. that's why I don't understand why you are using it in the same sentence with "Low Crime doesn't mean No Crime" (which by the way, was coined by our very own Addadude, years ago for the SPF campaign)
Awwww thats not nice, after all it is sunny ManchesterFortan wrote:Bet you were happy you didn't go to the away game on SundaySteve1960 wrote: I was at White Hart Lane weekend before last. We lost but it was so nice to be back in the stadium watching a game
Right. You got a dozen of low cost airlines and an amazing number of places where you can go to in a matter of hours. Just one hour and you are in Msia or Indonesia. Every weekend you can be elsewhere.singapore eagle wrote: Singapore's main problem is its size. After a while, you literally have to leave the country to find something new. Not impossible, of course (although I strongly suspect the Singapore government deliberately make travel to Malaysia about as a difficult as it could possibly be), but my point is that in other major cities you have a whole range of places to go just a short distance away.
Why the presumption? Is it because you have?singapore eagle wrote: Anyway, I meant only to suggest that you might have grown tired of any big city as you moved from your 30s to your 60s?
And Geylang is full of Indians, but does that mean every Indian goes to Geylang?Wd40 wrote:I thought all expats drink every weekend and some drink every afternoon . The Harrys in Signature building is full of expat bankers, everyday and not just weekends!zzm9980 wrote:I don't think you have to convince anyone here (Except noskitch) that Singapore is dull. The only groups of people I've ever found that disagree are the 'true blues' who have only lived in Singapore, and think the only everything wrong with Singapore is caused by the foreigners, and silly 20something (mostly) expats who just go drinking every weekend. They would do the same thing anywhere they lived.singapore eagle wrote: To prove I'm not just trolling, I'm not going to back down on this one either.
Singapore's main problem is its size. After a while, you literally have to leave the country to find something new. Not impossible, of course (although I strongly suspect the Singapore government deliberately make travel to Malaysia about as a difficult as it could possibly be), but my point is that in other major cities you have a whole range of places to go just a short distance away.
For further proof of Singapore's dullness, you just have to look at what I am convinced is the most popular leisure activity in Singapore: wandering aimlessly round a shopping mall.
Looks like noskich is still chugging down the Kool-Aid.zzm9980 wrote:I don't think you have to convince anyone here (Except noskitch) that Singapore is dull. The only groups of people I've ever found that disagree are the 'true blues' who have only lived in Singapore, and think the only everything wrong with Singapore is caused by the foreigners, and silly 20something (mostly) expats who just go drinking every weekend. They would do the same thing anywhere they lived.singapore eagle wrote:To prove I'm not just trolling, I'm not going to back down on this one either.noskich wrote: I would love to know which place is not like that. After a while all places become dull. It`s just a matter of the time it takes to reach that point.
If you as you say `fundamentally` are not capable of creating fun for yourself any place won`t do.
Singapore's main problem is its size. After a while, you literally have to leave the country to find something new. Not impossible, of course (although I strongly suspect the Singapore government deliberately make travel to Malaysia about as a difficult as it could possibly be), but my point is that in other major cities you have a whole range of places to go just a short distance away.
For further proof of Singapore's dullness, you just have to look at what I am convinced is the most popular leisure activity in Singapore: wandering aimlessly round a shopping mall.
How about London or New York for starters? If a person runs out of things to do in places like those, then it is they who are dull and unimaginative. But here in Singapore, it is hard to find new things to do after a while. Having said that, I think it's better now than a few years ago. For example, IMO the Esplanade is a wonderful place, with workshops, performances (many of which are free), etc. going on all the time. Although even I wouldn't want to go there every day.I would love to know which place is not like that.
And they all walk in single file, too, right?zzm9980 wrote:And Geylang is full of Indians, but does that mean every Indian goes to Geylang?
Not as an easy comparison. If you're flying, you have to take into account that you have to be at the airport 2 hours ahead (in some cases where you're lucky, 45 minutes). Also, you can never go to the beach without needing a passport (and no, Sentosa doesn't count) or being mindful of the war against moisture or how heavy your bag(s) is/are. And that you have to exchange money.noskich wrote: Right. You got a dozen of low cost airlines and an amazing number of places where you can go to in a matter of hours. Just one hour and you are in Msia or Indonesia. Every weekend you can be elsewhere.
Try Australia and the size problem. Should you want to go abroad you need at the very least +6 hours flight with the average return ticket price of 700-800 dollars (New Zealand is not really abroad). Sydney, the biggest city in Australia, has 3 spots around you can go to (Blue mountains, Hunter valley and Woollongong) and for each it will take you longer than to go abroad from Singapore. When put in that perspective Sydney is much more dull.
WHAT??? That's like saying that if you live in Singapore, Indonesia is 'not really abroad'. Try suggesting the above hypothesis to a Kiwi - and let me know when you're going to do that so I can be there to watch their reaction.noskich wrote:Try Australia and the size problem. Should you want to go abroad you need at the very least +6 hours flight with the average return ticket price of 700-800 dollars (New Zealand is not really abroad).
Sydney, the biggest city in Australia, has 3 spots around you can go to (Blue mountains, Hunter valley and Woollongong) and for each it will take you longer than to go abroad from Singapore. When put in that perspective Sydney is much more dull.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests