Are you talking about ethics or legalities?BoroBoy wrote:I agree the news papers manipulated it and put in all the crap about Caucasians being turned away. Complete garbage journalism but it doesnt change the fundamentals.
I think that is an <I>and</I> condition not an <I>or</I> condition, but even if its not I think this falls into the public definition because it wasnt an 'invite only' event. It was a privately paid for event that was open to <B>public registration</B>. If the singapore embassy had sent invitations to 10k people on its list then that would have not been racist. Inviting the public to register but denying based on nationality is racist.
SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Singaporeans face potential charges for racism in Australia
The embassy invite Singaporean people 'on their books'BoroBoy wrote: ok, replace 'public place' with 'place' the point is still valid because the registrations were open to the public.
Its not like a wedding, because you invite people at a wedding. As I said, in my non-expert opinion - if the singapore embassy had invited the people on its books then there would be no issue. The issue is they restricted public registration based on nationality.
It is not intended for walk-in non SGns, with no connection
It is not open-invite, it is a private event
As a courtesy non-SGn friends of SGns are welcome
It is a private party, aimed at SGns, but which welcomes all, via their friends/family.
Got it?
But I thought they had a web page with open registration?JR8 wrote:The embassy invite Singaporean people 'on their books'BoroBoy wrote: ok, replace 'public place' with 'place' the point is still valid because the registrations were open to the public.
Its not like a wedding, because you invite people at a wedding. As I said, in my non-expert opinion - if the singapore embassy had invited the people on its books then there would be no issue. The issue is they restricted public registration based on nationality.
It is not intended for walk-in non SGns, with no connection
It is not open-invite, it is a private event
As a courtesy non-SGn friends of SGns are welcome
It is a private party, aimed at SGns, but which welcomes all, via their friends/family.
Got it?
By 'Got it' I will kindly assume you are asking whether I understand you and not using it as a rhetorical question where you are forcing your point of view on me as you would a child or a subordinate.JR8 wrote:The embassy invite Singaporean people 'on their books'BoroBoy wrote: ok, replace 'public place' with 'place' the point is still valid because the registrations were open to the public.
Its not like a wedding, because you invite people at a wedding. As I said, in my non-expert opinion - if the singapore embassy had invited the people on its books then there would be no issue. The issue is they restricted public registration based on nationality.
It is not intended for walk-in non SGns, with no connection
It is not open-invite, it is a private event
As a courtesy non-SGn friends of SGns are welcome
It is a private party, aimed at SGns, but which welcomes all, via their friends/family.
Got it?
If you are asking whether I agree with you, then no I dont. If you were asking me if I understand your point, then yes I do but I dont think what you have said is accurate. The fact is there was a open public registration page that restricted registration based on nationality (https://app.singaporeday.gov.sg/registration.aspx). That is what I am against.
What if the KKK hired out the botanical gardens put up a registration page but you had to agree you were white before they would let you register? Its racist.
BoroBoy wrote: By 'Got it' I will kindly assume you are asking whether I understand you and not using it as a rhetorical question where you are forcing your point of view on me as you would a child or a subordinate.
If you are asking whether I agree with you, then no I dont. If you were asking me if I understand your point, then yes I do but I dont think what you have said is accurate. The fact is there was a open public registration page that restricted registration based on nationality (https://app.singaporeday.gov.sg/registration.aspx). That is what I am against.
What if the KKK hired out the botanical gardens put up a registration page but you had to agree you were white before they would let you register? Its racist.
Of course it was a rhetorical statement: I'm trying to jolt you with some reality, and invite you to point out where you think my opinion is wrong.
Anyway you got your answer re the intent of those government funded freebie days.
If you don't like it, complain to the government. Oh, and let us know how you get on with that eh. Here, I'll propose a starter template for you...
------------------
'I BoroBoy
IC# abcdefg
Address, block # etc
I write to protest and oppose, government policy XZY. Because ...
-------------------
Simple enough eh? Please post the completed version, so we can observe and assist.
I guess if I wanted to complain to the authorities then I should complain to the Australian authorities. However, I dont care enough to do that. This is a forum where people offer their alternative opinions and discuss. Just because I have a strong argument does not mean I now have to progress and lodge my opinion with a government or legal office.JR8 wrote:BoroBoy wrote: By 'Got it' I will kindly assume you are asking whether I understand you and not using it as a rhetorical question where you are forcing your point of view on me as you would a child or a subordinate.
If you are asking whether I agree with you, then no I dont. If you were asking me if I understand your point, then yes I do but I dont think what you have said is accurate. The fact is there was a open public registration page that restricted registration based on nationality (https://app.singaporeday.gov.sg/registration.aspx). That is what I am against.
What if the KKK hired out the botanical gardens put up a registration page but you had to agree you were white before they would let you register? Its racist.
Of course it was a rhetorical statement: I'm trying to jolt you with some reality, and invite you to point out where you think my opinion is wrong.
Anyway you got your answer re the intent of those government funded freebie days.
If you don't like it, complain to the government. Oh, and let us know how you get on with that eh. Here, I'll propose a starter template for you...
------------------
'I BoroBoy
IC# abcdefg
Address, block # etc
I write to protest and oppose, government policy XZY. Because ...
-------------------
Simple enough eh? Please post the completed version, so we can observe and assist.

If this was an event in Singapore I would be quiet and suck it up. Many a time I have read and heard 'this is singapore we have our rules, if you dont like it then leave.' Thats fine, I agree its their country so they should make the rules and I am happy to participate on their terms and would not complain to their government about how they chose to run their country. But, this is Australia, if you dont like their rules and laws and aren't willing to participate on their terms dont hold events there.
In this case, its not your/our gahmen. Its a 3rd party. You are in Australia and you are complaining as an Australian.JR8 wrote:BoroBoy wrote: By 'Got it' I will kindly assume you are asking whether I understand you and not using it as a rhetorical question where you are forcing your point of view on me as you would a child or a subordinate.
If you are asking whether I agree with you, then no I dont. If you were asking me if I understand your point, then yes I do but I dont think what you have said is accurate. The fact is there was a open public registration page that restricted registration based on nationality (https://app.singaporeday.gov.sg/registration.aspx). That is what I am against.
What if the KKK hired out the botanical gardens put up a registration page but you had to agree you were white before they would let you register? Its racist.
Of course it was a rhetorical statement: I'm trying to jolt you with some reality, and invite you to point out where you think my opinion is wrong.
Anyway you got your answer re the intent of those government funded freebie days.
If you don't like it, complain to the government. Oh, and let us know how you get on with that eh. Here, I'll propose a starter template for you...
------------------
'I BoroBoy
IC# abcdefg
Address, block # etc
I write to protest and oppose, government policy XZY. Because ...
-------------------
Simple enough eh? Please post the completed version, so we can observe and assist.
I am arguing that is was not a true private party because they opened it up for public registration and restricted registration based on nationality and directly contravened section 3.2.2 of the race discrimination act.JR8 wrote:Which bit of holding a private party, is in breach of 'their terms'?BoroBoy wrote: But, this is Australia, if you dont like their rules and laws and aren't willing to participate on their terms dont hold events there.
Come on... which... which...
Please be precise, in your reply.
http://www.humanrights.gov.au/federal-d ... -act#3_2_2
Nope not pissed off, I already said I dont care that much. I just said my opinion then followed up on the quoted questions. Its a forum thats how it works.JR8 wrote:If you're really pissed off, how some private venues are treating people... can you contact them please. Have the discussion?
I dont really see how that is related, but I would never be as presumptuous to think that anyone on a forum cares who I am.JR8 wrote:Not sure if anyone here knows who you are, or cares...
IMO, laws are completely worthless if you can't apply commonsense, decency and tolerance to the situation. Nit picking at "rules" and trying to paint every single public or private event with one brush is silly. You have to also take into account the purpose of the event and other factors, not just blindly follow rules. There are often different interpretations of rules and situations.BoroBoy wrote:Nope not pissed off, I already said I dont care that much. I just said my opinion then followed up on the quoted questions. Its a forum thats how it works.JR8 wrote:If you're really pissed off, how some private venues are treating people... can you contact them please. Have the discussion?
I dont really see how that is related, but I would never be as presumptuous to think that anyone on a forum cares who I am.JR8 wrote:Not sure if anyone here knows who you are, or cares...
IMO it was just a slow news day in AU and the whole thing just blew over in Australia after the actual facts were heard.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Dreamworld faces charges over killer ride
by abbby » Tue, 21 Jul 2020 1:05 pm » in General Discussions - 1 Replies
- 1035 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Tue, 21 Jul 2020 6:03 pm
-
-
- 1 Replies
- 1701 Views
-
Last post by Lisafuller
Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:19 pm
-
-
Enbloc potential properties
by abbby » Tue, 04 Feb 2020 10:57 am » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 3 Replies
- 1822 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Wed, 05 Feb 2020 2:40 pm
-
-
-
18 Singaporeans injured as Batam's Montigo resort bridge collasped
by abbby » Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:54 am » in Travel & Holidays - 0 Replies
- 2134 Views
-
Last post by abbby
Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:54 am
-
-
- 35 Replies
- 11440 Views
-
Last post by Lisafuller
Thu, 21 Sep 2023 1:03 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests