Wow. Granted, those are just opinions by random people, and you hear such persons of lower intellect also voice out in a lot of other countries. As a proponent of free speech, I find it good that they are given an opportunity to voice out on government media, but having lived in Singapore for a while, I am always wary when they publish such opinions, as they rarely do so without afterthought. I think those people misunderstand the basics of economics... Such measures would make the hiring process a lot more difficult and expensive, and that together with the high cost here would just drive businesses out.Wd40 wrote:I cant believe articles like these have appeared on Today:
http://www.todayonline.com/voices/dont- ... g-job-bank
http://www.todayonline.com/voices/contr ... moms-radar
These people must understand one fundamental difference between Singapore and other developed countries like UK, USA etc. The latter have mostly local companies, local clients and local business whereas Singapore have foreign companies, foreign clients and foreign business.
These foreign companies dont need to be present here. The only reason they were here because it was relatively easier to do business. If that fundamental thing changes and you start making it difficult to do business, these companies will just relocate.
Like somebody said earlier in this thread, this is a very slippery path of no return and now it can only get worse.
Well there are hundreds of comments on TRE and other sites of that ilk, so a significant number of Singaporeans obviously do visit them (I'm sure there are many more readers than commenters). More to the point, these kinds of sites pop up when searching for Singapore on Google, so companies researching possible locations for their operations in Asia will find them.touchring wrote:p/s: As for TRE brought up by Addadude, I wouldn't be bothered by TRE, most Singaporeans don't bother to read TRE or don't even know about the existence of that website.
Mi Amigo wrote: The country has a metaphorical gun pointed at its feet and there are many people clambering to pull the trigger. Sad for Singapore, but beneficial for other countries who will attract the inward investment and employment opportunities instead.
Mi Amigo wrote:Last time we recruited for a position here we had similar problems. One candidate refused to come for an interview unless we agreed to his minimum salary requirements before we even spoke to him. He even emailed back to revise the figure upwards. Needless to say we declined to ask him in. He's probably one of the sad fools bleating about not being hired on the Xenophobe Emeritus site. We did hire a Singaporean for the role in the end, but the attitude of some of the applicants I've seen over the years has been breathtaking. Talk about entitlement complex.
There may be some truth in that, but blaming everything on the government (as many do) is really just deflecting the issue. As Addadude said, these folks need to "look in the mirror."touchring wrote:The entitlement complex maybe indirectly nurtured by the government, that publicizes "goodies", free cash before an election.
Another reason to get a psychologist is the silly habit of Singaporeans always bring up other places to try to deflect the unpleasantness of their not being able to refute something, rather than staring it in the face, admitting it and figuring out how to effectively change it rather than, as Mi Amigo said, trying to find somebody else or something else to blame their own shortcomings on. You actually pick the wrong forum to try it on. Most of us have been here a long, long time and I warrant you that all of us have huge amounts of experience with the employment of Singaporeans of all races.touchring wrote: Job hopping is a serious problem in Singapore. From what I've heard, job hopping is also a problem in China, not sure about HK.
Had done some Googling on the reason for job hopping in the past, a few explanations came up, peer pressure, a lack of security and an entitlement complex as you mentioned.
A psychologist may offer a better explanation.
Wd40 wrote:Off topic. I was born in Feb 1980. Looks like I am Gen X according to wiki. Missed Gen Y, damn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_y
I'm not ignorant of the fact that Singaporeans are not the best employees around, I myself have dealt with people of different nationality in their own country.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Another reason to get a psychologist is the silly habit of Singaporeans always bring up other places to try to deflect the unpleasantness of their not being able to refute something, rather than staring it in the face, admitting it and figuring out how to effectively change it rather than, as Mi Amigo said, trying to find somebody else or something else to blame their own shortcomings on. You actually pick the wrong forum to try it on. Most of us have been here a long, long time and I warrant you that all of us have huge amounts of experience with the employment of Singaporeans of all races.
touchring wrote: In the medium term, as the economies in the West improve, interest rates will rise, the US$, Euro and Pound will appreciate significantly against Asian currencies, people will start leaving for better pay back home regardless of how "pro-foreigner" the government policies are in Singapore. This is something that is inevitable and the Singapore government recognizes that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests