zzm9980 wrote:Barnsley wrote:
"In his commentary, Mr Putin maintained his steadfast support of Syrian President Bashar al Assad, writing there was "every reason to believe" it was not the regime, but rebel forces who used sarin nerve gas in an attack on August 21"

Putin sees him as necessary to maintain stability. I think Iraq is proof enough you need a brutal thug in charge of some places to prevent further massive slaughter. All of those rebel groups are just going to turn outward a few years after they remove Al-Assad and the dust settles there. Putin sees this, the US seems to have forgotten already.
The UN has said that it has "unequivocal" evidence that Syria used the chemical weapons... and I'm sure Putin would never lie, would he?
Having said that, as much as it stinks, I agree that a dictator is required to hold the warring factions in control. There is a great book called Spiral Dynamics whose basic premise is that you cannot drag a society from a stone age culture to modern democracy... it must go through 4 or 5 phases.
Iraq is failing because those is power have failed to heed to lessons in Spiral Dynamics... they might have had a chance if they had embraced the theories and attempted to put them to work.