
As far as I know, the curry incident happened between the China national and the Indians. Singaporean Chinese are not known to be explicit unless it really really bothers them. Even so, they would not be blunt but subtly expressed their displeasure. The government's option of 'forcing' Singaporeans/PR of different races to live together under the same HDB block is one of the ways they can think of to promote tolerance and understanding.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Until you have the curry wars, you mean.![]()
Locals are so racist on so many different fronts, even after 30 years here, it still boggles my mind, for all their spouting about how multi-racial they are. They are "tolerant" out of fear, as was mentioned already.
The multiculturalism is forced on them by the government sanctioned racial policies embedded in the HDB housing policy where the "mixing" of the races is micro-managed down to the individual housing block. Given their choice they would never buy next door to a minority.
I find that Malays and Eurasians are the least racist of the four main groups here. The curry crowd is just about as racist as the incense burners are and just about a tolerant. Oddly enough, though, you see a lot of Indian males with Chinese females here. But on top of the forced multiculturalism they have a healthy dose of xenophobia as well against all foreigners but more against those of their own race coming from their ethnic countries of origin. No damn wonder the survey said Singaporeans are an unhappy lot. They bring it on themselves.
Are their respective cultures responsible? Their respective religions? I don't think it's the latter though, but I could be wrong. Or is it a depleted gene pool from too much social engineering?
As far as the results on the map? I think zzm is spot on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest