PR For Indian

[sundaymorningstaple]

True , I get that ...but propotionately , around 2 K people of my XXXX should be getting PR every year , considering the demographics ...Guess that our profile wasn't in that.

Not true ppx. Until the demographics are back to where they were in/around Y2K (7% not 9+%) it will continue to be a stumbling block for all from that XXXX with the exception of those really bringing something of value to the table. The the government will be pragmatic in their decision making processes. Remember, the government is trying to both curtail the numbers of new PR AND correct the demographics which means the demographic side will probably be via attrition and not by larger influx of the new majority XXXX to offset the demographic discrepancy.

[Wd40]

True , I get that ...but propotionately , around 2 K people of my XXXX should be getting PR every year , considering the demographics ...Guess that our profile wasn't in that.

....and don't pin hopes on that the rejection letter to read "Apply is XX months/years". That previledge is also for only a specific XXXX.

[ppx]

True , I get that ...but propotionately , around 2 K people of my XXXX should be getting PR every year , considering the demographics ...Guess that our profile wasn't in that.

....and don't pin hopes on that the rejection letter to read "Apply is XX months/years". That previledge is also for only a specific XXXX.

Yes , my wife received the letter with no mention of XX months/years..quite clear what the gahment wants to say

[ppx]

True , I get that ...but propotionately , around 2 K people of my XXXX should be getting PR every year , considering the demographics ...Guess that our profile wasn't in that.

Not true ppx. Until the demographics are back to where they were in/around Y2K (7% not 9+%) it will continue to be a stumbling block for all from that XXXX with the exception of those really bringing something of value to the table. The the government will be pragmatic in their decision making processes. Remember, the government is trying to both curtail the numbers of new PR AND correct the demographics which means the demographic side will probably be via attrition and not by larger influx of the new majority XXXX to offset the demographic discrepancy.

I agree with the pragmatism bit , but what I dont agree is the suspense created about clear criteria about what works for the PR.

[sundaymorningstaple]

Very good reason for that. Tailor made applications.

[PNGMK]

Very good reason for that. Tailor made applications.

Yep, and then corrupt immigration agents/lawyers.

[ppx]

True , I get that ...but propotionately , around 2 K people of my XXXX should be getting PR every year , considering the demographics ...Guess that our profile wasn't in that.

....and don't pin hopes on that the rejection letter to read "Apply is XX months/years". That previledge is also for only a specific XXXX.

Yes , my wife received the letter with no mention of XX months/years..quite clear what the gahment wants to say

.

Finally, I also got the letter with no mention. I guess will have to wait till anything significant changes in my profile to re-apply. Thanks everyone for the suggestions and help.

[vishalgupta2]

Good luck, remember to start working on your Plan B before your EP expires.

[ppx]

Good luck, remember to start working on your Plan B before your EP expires.

Thanks Vishal, Plan B is India in my case so Plan B is always there