From how I understand your situation, the agent is the landlord's so why is he pestering you? He should take it up with the landlord, not you.martincymru wrote:Facts:
I moved in as sole tenant into a condo Feb 1 2012, 12 month lease.
Date now is May 20 2013.
Landlord is happy to just continue on month to month basis and we have agreed one month notice either way, no reason required.
Problem is the original agent is "demanding" that I do a new lease. the agent was engaged by the Landlord not me as the Tenant.
Do I have to comply with this demand from the original agent ? All maintenance is now dealt directly with Landlord so I presume Landlord is happy to avoid extra fees and so am I. (I have not addressed matter with Landlord yet).
Basically what the other two guys told you. Agent can f* off. Only exception would be if the landlord has some type of contract with the agent forbidding him from entering into this kind of arrangement. But then that is entirely on the landlord.martincymru wrote: Problem is the original agent is "demanding" that I do a new lease. the agent was engaged by the Landlord not me as the Tenant.
Do I have to comply with this demand from the original agent ? All maintenance is now dealt directly with Landlord so I presume Landlord is happy to avoid extra fees and so am I. (I have not addressed matter with Landlord yet).
It is not uncommon, and usual for the terms of the original tenancy to roll over in totality. The new arrangement is known as a Periodic Statutory Tenancy (PST), and it also forms if say on a 12 month lease, and after 12 months - for what ever reason - the tenant does not move out. (They are then on an PST).Strong Eagle wrote:I ran a month to month for many months with a simple email stating our agreement. We simply stated that the terms of the lease agreement continued to be in effect, except that either party could terminate in 60 days.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests