The following is extracted from The Tipping Point, a book by Malcom Gladwell.zzm9980 wrote:Sorry, but I think you've fallen to the typical stereotypes having lived away so long. In my 20+ years in Chicago and 7+ years in California, I can easily say in almost all cases with a crowd, multiple people will be willing to help. Being the US, in the (very few) cases where someone won't help, it will be well publicized and all over the media. I mean, just look at the recent case in Ohio. A neighbor heard a girl call for help from behind a locked door, and he broke the door down to help her escape. There was no fire or any other incident that made it immediately apparent there was a danger. I would even bet you $1000 if Clark Quay incident here happened at any equivalent popular area in a major US city, that guy would have gotten physically restrained and 50% chance knocked out.sundaymorningstaple wrote:The US is no longer, if it ever was, civilized. Most will not help a traffic victim so some such because of the lawsuits that have happened.
Hmm...thismyvoice wrote:The following is extracted from The Tipping Point, a book by Malcom Gladwell.zzm9980 wrote:Sorry, but I think you've fallen to the typical stereotypes having lived away so long. In my 20+ years in Chicago and 7+ years in California, I can easily say in almost all cases with a crowd, multiple people will be willing to help. Being the US, in the (very few) cases where someone won't help, it will be well publicized and all over the media. I mean, just look at the recent case in Ohio. A neighbor heard a girl call for help from behind a locked door, and he broke the door down to help her escape. There was no fire or any other incident that made it immediately apparent there was a danger. I would even bet you $1000 if Clark Quay incident here happened at any equivalent popular area in a major US city, that guy would have gotten physically restrained and 50% chance knocked out.sundaymorningstaple wrote:The US is no longer, if it ever was, civilized. Most will not help a traffic victim so some such because of the lawsuits that have happened.
In 1964, New York City, a young woman was stabbed to death. She was chased by her assailant and attacked 3 times on the street, over half an hour, as 38 of her neighbours watched from their windows. During that time, none of them called the police. Two psychologist conducted a study to understand what they dubbed the bystander problem. What they found, surprisingly was that one of the factors above all else that predicted helping behavior was how many witnesses there were to the event.
One experiment was when they have 1 student in the room stage an epileptic fit. When there was just one person next door listening, they will come and help 85% of the time. But when there are 4 others, they will help 31% of the time.
In another experiment, people who saw smoke seeping out of the doorway would report it 75% of the time when they are on their own, but the incident would only be reported 38% of the time when they are in a group. When people are in a group, responsibility for acting is diffused.
Err....she (Mellisa) was never at CQ during the harrassment...she's chastising the people who commented in Facebook as I see it...JR8 wrote: There might be more, but those were in the top two pages. The impression I get from these are that she is self-publicising, and decidedly vulgar. Oh, and then we are left wondering why she didn't step in to help. Surely you can't chastise others for doing nothing, when you did nothing yourself?
Oh no no, I actually agree to that and I was pondering on how serious this means. What a shuddering thought it would be to be a victim in such scenarios...x9200 wrote:@lynx, why hmmm? Makes perfect sense. Lack of action from other people is not only a reassuring factor but also discouraging at the same time respectively depending on the initial intention of the group member willing or not to help.
It is quite true. That's why when somebody is in an accident and you're helping them, you must point to somebody and say,x9200 wrote:@lynx, why hmmm? Makes perfect sense. Lack of action from other people is not only a reasuring factor but also discouraging at the same time respectively depending on the initial intension of the group member willing or not to help.
Truth be told JR8, though foul-mouthed, to me it's kinda good to see such direct honest comments instead of the stupid ones that you can see she's quoting in her blog from FB...JR8 wrote: OIC, thanks for clarifying.
But still I am left with the impression of a foul-mouthed, self-publicising arm-chair evangelist.
Yes I agree, that is a part of 'Accident Scene Management'Akimbo wrote:It is quite true. That's why when somebody is in an accident and you're helping them, you must point to somebody and say,
"You! Call the ambulance!" instead of just looking around and say,
"Anybody here a doctor?/Can someone call the ambulance?"
That's what was told in a safety course I saw once
Hmmm... the comments on yahoo.com.sg and the likes thereof, it's a bit like digging for gold in the comments of a Western tabloid newspaper: A rather futile exercise.akimbo wrote: Truth be told JR8, though foul-mouthed, to me it's kinda good to see such direct honest comments instead of the stupid ones that you can see she's quoting in her blog from FB...
I'm tired of the same old sorts of comments that I keep seeing whenever I read articles from yahoo.sg or something. Don't they ever make smarter comments that tickles your brain?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests