The only way you may have it quasi-dated is to dump it on CD and mail to yourself via registered mail. Still if the date is after the apartment was handed over to the tenant the LL may claim it happened before the photos had been taken but after the handover. But hey, have a bit of belief in STC, they are not idiots over there and they realize the odds so I would just stick to the photos taken in the presence of an impartial witness (i.e. your agent).katbh wrote:It is a rare landlord in Singapore that doesn't at least TRY to keep your bond! Only solution really is to document the place before you go in. Do not send the photos to them but make sure by using a newspaper date or date stamp that you have it dated. If you give the photos to the landlord...guaranteed they will find something that is NOT in the photos. So just make sure you let the agent/landlord know that you have photographed the place before entry.
I recall a few stories from this board contrary to the above statement. The only major problems I could see are if you have to leave the country immediately or/and if you have to engage the bailiff and the deposit is small.katbh wrote:You have virtually no rights if they keep your bond and I hear it is a real hassle to try to get the bond back from small claims court.
+1Sergei82 wrote:Strange, last landlord I dealt with was a pretty nice local Chinese couple. No problems, no complaints, everything returned on time, very positive experience.
But few of my friends are telling me horrible stories about them being on a brink of starting litigations...
While flat hunting i realized that my interest, as a tenant, are in conflict with the agent's .. I did change the metrics of incentivizing it.. Below are the details... Btw, i am vacating that unit since my EP got cancelledJR8 wrote:I've heard of this being done.nakatago wrote: Which is only exacerbated by the fact that they have no motivation to get you a lower rent because their fee is a percentage of what you'll pay.
Someone once here made a deal with his agent that any decrease in his rent will go to his agent as part of the fee. You can try this or a variation thereof if ever you'll engage an agent.
Just say that you like a place offered at $5k/mo. You could offer your agent, above any commission already due, maybe 10-25% of one years incremental savings he can negotiate on the rent.
i.e. make is a win-win for both of you.
I thought of this method and wondered, would this be considered as bribing?SV1231 wrote:While flat hunting i realized that my interest, as a tenant, are in conflict with the agent's .. I did change the metrics of incentivizing it.. Below are the details... Btw, i am vacating that unit since my EP got cancelled.. I love the place, the unit, the LL.. All very good
But my case was slightly different I told agent that his fees would be inversely proportional to the rent I pay.. so the more rent I pay .. the less I pay towards agency fee & vice versa..
So I mentioned that I believe that the fair rental value of this flat is 2K.. I will top up ur agency fee of 2K with any reduction you get me on Rent.
He negotiated & reduced it by $150. I paid him $2150 (2000 Agency fee+ 150 incentive for getting a good rental)..btw, my company took he tab of brokerage
Worked well for everyone involved..
Btw mine is 9 mins walking from the MRT station.. and 3rd stop via bus
I think the example needs to be clearer; if the agent is representing the tenant, then no it's not a bribe but a variable commission (performance based). However if the agent is representing the landlord and the tenant privately offer's the landlord's agent a side-payment for a lower rental, then yes this could be considered a bribe and both the tenant and (especially the) agent will get into trouble if they did such an arrangement to screw the landlord.the lynx wrote:I thought of this method and wondered, would this be considered as bribing?SV1231 wrote:While flat hunting i realized that my interest, as a tenant, are in conflict with the agent's .. I did change the metrics of incentivizing it.. Below are the details... Btw, i am vacating that unit since my EP got cancelled.. I love the place, the unit, the LL.. All very good
But my case was slightly different I told agent that his fees would be inversely proportional to the rent I pay.. so the more rent I pay .. the less I pay towards agency fee & vice versa..
So I mentioned that I believe that the fair rental value of this flat is 2K.. I will top up ur agency fee of 2K with any reduction you get me on Rent.
He negotiated & reduced it by $150. I paid him $2150 (2000 Agency fee+ 150 incentive for getting a good rental)..btw, my company took he tab of brokerage
Worked well for everyone involved..
Btw mine is 9 mins walking from the MRT station.. and 3rd stop via bus
Point 1 - agreedI think the example needs to be clearer; if the agent is representing the tenant, then no it's not a bribe but a variable commission (performance based).
However if the agent is representing the landlord and the tenant privately offer's the landlord's agent a side-payment for a lower rental, then yes this could be considered a bribe and both the tenant and (especially the) agent will get into trouble if they did such an arrangement to screw the landlord.
Yup exactly, so I thought that means it can be construed as a bribe, per wikipedia "Bribery is an act of giving money or gift giving that alters the behavior of the recipient. "JR8 wrote:point 2 - it would be a conflict of interest for the agent to accept such a payment.
Yup, horrendouskatbh wrote:It is a rare landlord in Singapore that doesn't at least TRY to keep your bond! Only solution really is to document the place before you go in. Do not send the photos to them but make sure by using a newspaper date or date stamp that you have it dated. If you give the photos to the landlord...guaranteed they will find something that is NOT in the photos. So just make sure you let the agent/landlord know that you have photographed the place before entry.
You have virtually no rights if they keep your bond and I hear it is a real hassle to try to get the bond back from small claims court.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests