Discuss about any latest news or current affairs in Singapore or globally. Please DO NOT copy and paste news articles from other sources without written permission.
-
nakatago
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 8358
- Joined: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: Sister Margaret’s School for Wayward Children
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by nakatago » Thu, 02 May 2013 3:38 pm
I'm paraphrasing here but I believe the higher bracket earners would like to say this to the lower bracket earners: "Go eff yourselves."
"A quokka is what would happen if there was an anime about kangaroos."
-
Wd40
- Director
![Director Director]()
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:53 am
- Location: SIndiapore
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Wd40 » Thu, 02 May 2013 9:54 pm
I dont think income inequality is the issue. Even the US has very high levels of income disparity.
Basically the general population wants something similar to what other developed countries have i.e. minimum wages. So a waiter or driver can also lead a good life.
In Singapore what you have right now is the rich live like in a developed world while the poor live like a poor person is suddenly plucked out from a third world country and put into first world but he is still earning the third world salary.

-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 39766
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Thu, 02 May 2013 10:33 pm
Wd40 wrote:
In Singapore what you have right now is the rich live like in a developed world while the poor live like a poor person is suddenly plucked out from a third world country and put into first world but he is still earning the third world salary.

Sadly, even that isn't true as the poor here still have concrete floors, a roof over their heads, most have a mobile phone and a color TV, electricity, running water and a proper toilet system an not a nightsoil collector or throw the bucket in the canal, swim in the canal to have a crap.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
ecureilx
- Immortal
![Immortal Immortal]()
- Posts: 9817
- Joined: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 5:18 pm
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by ecureilx » Fri, 03 May 2013 10:59 am
sundaymorningstaple wrote:Sadly, even that isn't true as the poor here still have concrete floors, a roof over their heads, most have a mobile phone and a color TV, electricity, running water and a proper toilet system an not a nightsoil collector or throw the bucket in the canal, swim in the canal to have a crap.
and I may add while there is no dole, or cash handouts, more than enough avenues are open for those who need help .. as long as they are willing to move their ass a bit .. and that's what makes me wonder whether the 2 % unemployed really exists or that is the number of guys who are in residual income and claiming to be unemployed !!!
-
zzm9980
- Governor
![Governor Governor]()
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 1:35 pm
- Location: Once more unto the breach
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by zzm9980 » Sat, 04 May 2013 6:49 pm
ecureilx wrote:sundaymorningstaple wrote:Sadly, even that isn't true as the poor here still have concrete floors, a roof over their heads, most have a mobile phone and a color TV, electricity, running water and a proper toilet system an not a nightsoil collector or throw the bucket in the canal, swim in the canal to have a crap.
and I may add while there is no dole, or cash handouts, more than enough avenues are open for those who need help .. as long as they are willing to move their ass a bit .. and that's what makes me wonder whether the 2 % unemployed really exists or that is the number of guys who are in residual income and claiming to be unemployed !!!
Another post (I think by JR8) hit the nail on the head - that 2% likely aren't unemployed, so much as unemployable. Just think of 50 random people you might see every day here - On the MTR, the bus, in a hawker center, your office, etc. I would expect more than one of those people to be incapable of holding a job due to a lack of mental aptitude or laziness, so I guess that 22% figure is pretty good.
-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 39766
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Sat, 04 May 2013 7:38 pm
Actually, I beg to differ. Those you see on public transport, e.g., buses & MRT are generally both employable or retired and on a residual income of one form or another. Those that aren't employable you will find in the void decks of HDB estates all hours of the day or night or they stay cooped up in their homes. Some of the scroungiest looking are still security personnel but don't put their uniforms on till they get to work, or they are FWs in transit. They all are not transported like cattle in the back a trucks but the majority are. How to tell the difference between a local or FW?
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
zzm9980
- Governor
![Governor Governor]()
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 1:35 pm
- Location: Once more unto the breach
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by zzm9980 » Sun, 05 May 2013 10:22 am
sundaymorningstaple wrote:Actually, I beg to differ. Those you see on public transport, e.g., buses & MRT are generally both employable or retired and on a residual income of one form or another.
I just meant everywhere really, and was naming examples. If I only consider the scroungy guys lounging in the void decks, then that's still more than 2% of the people I may see on a given day.
And does the 2% include all residents (Sc, Pr, Long term pass holders)? Or just SC and/or PR? I assumed the former. Unless it's a Sunday at the beach, anyone I assume is a FW I see usually appears to be working.
-
movingtospore
- Reporter
![Reporter Reporter]()
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 2:14 am
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by movingtospore » Sun, 05 May 2013 12:57 pm
Hmm the info graphic had me going for the first bit. If their aim was to start some engagement and discussion about certain government pay policies...but major fail at the end when they brought it all back to what it should cost for the poor babies to have a Lexus.

-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 39766
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Sun, 05 May 2013 2:19 pm
zzm9980 wrote:sundaymorningstaple wrote:Actually, I beg to differ. Those you see on public transport, e.g., buses & MRT are generally both employable or retired and on a residual income of one form or another.
I just meant everywhere really, and was naming examples. If I only consider the scroungy guys lounging in the void decks, then that's still more than 2% of the people I may see on a given day.
And does the 2% include all residents (Sc, Pr, Long term pass holders)? Or just SC and/or PR? I assumed the former. Unless it's a Sunday at the beach, anyone I assume is a FW I see usually appears to be working.
I've have seen various figures bandied about. Mostly you will see the figures of 2% referring to the resident population of Singapore or the 3% referring to Citizens & PRs. Depends on who's making the points and whether they are trying to make points for or against. Anybody on a work visa would they would keep in the employment but the accompanying family members would load it artificially as they are resident population but they are NOT employable. Whereas all the Citizens and PRs ARE employable. Anything below 2.8%, I believe, internationally is considered structural unemployment anyway, so for all intents and purposes, full employment already. This is why the whole thing would be funny, if it weren't so sad that those with eyes still cannot see. Okay, I know, they also have the largest percentage of myopia of any country in the world. So, that could help to explain their shortsightedness. :-/
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
Chantikki
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:47 am
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Chantikki » Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:52 pm
They all want to be in the 1%. I once joined "occupy singapore" and basically they all wanted to be one percenters
-
Wd40
- Director
![Director Director]()
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:53 am
- Location: SIndiapore
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Wd40 » Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:36 am
Seriously $11,495 for company directors and senior management? To me that looks like middle level income. Senior management easily make 300k per annum and above.
Think about it, if you are director of a company and the lowest rung executive earns 5k a month, would you be happy earning just double that? I would like to earn atleast 5 times that or else why take all the pressure of being a director.

-
the lynx
- Governor
![Governor Governor]()
- Posts: 5281
- Joined: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 6:29 pm
- Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by the lynx » Fri, 16 Aug 2013 8:44 am
Wd40 wrote:Seriously $11,495 for company directors and senior management? To me that looks like middle level income. Senior management easily make 300k per annum and above.
Think about it, if you are director of a company and the lowest rung executive earns 5k a month, would you be happy earning just double that? I would like to earn atleast 5 times that or else why take all the pressure of being a director.

Obviously the said company directors and senior management belong to the SME clutter. By paying their cheap foreign labour under $3000, these 'directors' and 'senior managers' are proportionally earning close to 4 times their wages like that.
-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 39766
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Fri, 16 Aug 2013 9:03 am
^^This.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
PNGMK
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 8778
- Joined: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 9:06 pm
-
Answers: 2
- Location: Sinkapore
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by PNGMK » Fri, 16 Aug 2013 9:51 am
I've been involved peripherally with a Singapore charity. Up until a year ago we used to get a regular newsletter with stories in it. The stories all involve ghastly levels of poverty and sometimes abuse.
The poor here - do it very, very hard. Regardless of what SMS says there are people here who are still forced to give up their children for adoption because they literally cannot feed, clothe or educate them. I'm not talking about babies either - but 6 year olds and even teens. These people are earning money but sometimes only $500 and having to rent a room out of that and keep their four kids in it. We don't see that unless you're directly involved with these people. That's the problem with income equality here. I know this is not quite india levels of poverty but it's close.
As for the government helping there was a case recently where a homeless applicant go so frustrated with the paperwork (as he said - "how can I have my brothers and sisters NRIC and all their tax statements and education docs? I am homeless and on the street") he ended up being arrested for assault. The mother freaks who dole out the welfare are so up themselves with making sure that only the 'deserving get it' that in my opinion a lot less is given out than should be.
The Gini coefficient here is shameful and led in the main by the greedy PAP.
-
-
UK to Singapore - income question?
Hello :) I've been researching moving to Singapore after my brother who works in the same field as I do moved there a few months back and absolutely...
- 0 Replies
- 1632 Views
-
Last post by Careykyle
Thu, 09 Aug 2018 8:37 pm
-
-
Income Tax Relief query
Replies: 5
First post
Hello Expats (& Experts)
Need to understand if I can claim for Non-Working Wife Relief & Child Relief when filing my taxes.
Situation: My wife &...
Last post
Thank you @PNGMK and @sundaymorningstaple
Yes, my family is not in Singapore (no LTVP/DP yet). It will be first time when (if) I raise a DP requests...
- 5 Replies
- 2836 Views
-
Last post by prateekcool007
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 2:32 pm
-
-
Reducing Taxable Income from Salary
Replies: 2
First post
Hello All,
I am trying to better understand the Income Tax regs for Foreigners/Expats working in SG on an EP.
With regards to Salary income:
1)...
Last post
The most significant tax deductibles for you will be SRS and possibly insurance policies.
You can't claim much else as a none SC/SPR.
Google SRS...
- 2 Replies
- 1356 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:33 am
-
-
- 0 Replies
- 2975 Views
-
Last post by nchadha3
Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:04 am
-
-
Spouse Income requirement for LTVP
Replies: 8
First post
Hi All, I am an Indian Citizen currently working in Singapore on an S Pass for last 10 years. I am married to a SG citizen for more than 8 years. My...
Last post
yes we dont have children yet. so we are stuck on that angle. Our options are only if my wife is earning. Is there a minimum that she needs to earn?
- 8 Replies
- 4318 Views
-
Last post by nan_jee
Thu, 06 Dec 2018 5:17 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests