True, the timing couldn't be worse...someone just got himself in deep shit. Especially since this is just an assumption but no fact, and we know how jumpy the locals are these days...offshoreoildude wrote:You gotta figure that DBS vickers are no friend of the PAP for publishing that just before an election!
I have wondered for awhile how PAP friendly the CEO of DBS is... he has very big aspirations for DBS (Damn Bloody Stupid bank as a Sinky once told me) - much bigger than this little red dot.wwww wrote:True, the timing couldn't be worse...someone just got himself in deep shit. Especially since this is just an assumption but no fact, and we know how jumpy the locals are these days...offshoreoildude wrote:You gotta figure that DBS vickers are no friend of the PAP for publishing that just before an election!
Same way that it's been done so far.Sergei82 wrote:http://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/stocks ... 54290.html
Already being discussed on numerous forums...
So indeed, how they're going to target that population growth to 7 mln? Clone humans??? Bitrth rate is going down, foreigners are squeezed out...
How long ago have you been to Seoul? (for example)ScoobyDoes wrote:7m people is already a big problem in Hong Kong and when we factor in the difference in physical size....... Singapore wouldn't be a place I want to live if EVER it were to become a reality.
Very hopefully by then, I'll be dead and burnt to a crisp!
With the massive housing oversupply hitting the market in the next few years I am not too worried. However, MRT rides will become a very "cozy" experience, especially in the NEL which is serving PAP's latest boom town Punggol.ScoobyDoes wrote:7m people is already a big problem in Hong Kong and when we factor in the difference in physical size....... Singapore wouldn't be a place I want to live if EVER it were to become a reality.
Very hopefully by then, I'll be dead and burnt to a crisp!
That is your interpretation. But no it doesn't mean that (1960 it was 1.6M) simply the growth rate has changed since 1960-1990, from 70 to 90 it took 20 years to grow 1M and resident growth was relatively faster then for the last 20 year. Since 1990 the rate has been different and since the growth is pretty much controlled by ICA therefore I wouldn't call it that dubious.Sergei82 wrote:Very dubious interpolation, implying that Singapore was uninhabited island in 1960.
Does anyone know statistics for 2012 + projected for 2013? Let us interpolate that!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests