Relocating, travelling or planning to make Singapore home? Discuss the criterias, passes or visa that is required.
-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 7:50 pm
Hi all,
I applied for PEP online few days ago. In the online form, I indicated I wanted to transfer all existing DPs accompanied with my existing EP, but in the end there were no forms or anything to fill in the DP particulars. Looking at the manual form, there are pages asking about that. I realized this by today and I called MOM to ask about, they advised I can login to EP online and submit the application for DP. I am a bit blurred, my spouse is already on DP, I just want to put them into the PEP application along with me. And more, I couldn't find any parts related to online DP application on the EP portal...
Anybody knows is this normal that online PEP doesn't need to fill in DP particulars in case they want to include the DP in the application?
Or else what exactly I should do now?
Thanks
-
zzm9980
- Governor
![Governor Governor]()
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 1:35 pm
- Location: Once more unto the breach
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by zzm9980 » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 7:58 pm
MOM should already have all existing DP details, so you don't need to fill anything out.
-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 40551
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 21
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 9:04 pm
Hopefully you are making over 12K/month as they will surely sit on it for three weeks until Dec 1 when the new guidelines come into play or just reject it because they see what you are trying to do.....
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 9:35 pm
No, My salary is not in that range, I am holding P2 atm.
To be honestly, I only awared of the changes in the requirements for PEP today. My intention is not to secure job safety at first...
Thanks you zzm and sms
-
Strong Eagle
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 11758
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
-
Answers: 11
- Location: Off The Red Dot
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Strong Eagle » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:30 pm
freeman.vu wrote:No, My salary is not in that range, I am holding P2 atm.
To be honestly, I only awared of the changes in the requirements for PEP today. My intention is not to secure job safety at first...
Thanks you zzm and sms
Even if you were to be granted a PEP, it would be taken away at the end of 2013 because you did not earn $12,000 per month in 2013.
Unfortunately for you, I don't think this is going to happen.
-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:47 pm
What I understand is assuming someone got the PEP now, the impact of the new requirements will only take effect from 31 Dec 20114 not 2013...
Anw, as I said I didn't know the new requirements are going to be that soon at the time I applied... let see how it goes.
Thanks again
-
BillyB
- Manager
![Manager Manager]()
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:01 pm
- Location: My laptop
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by BillyB » Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:04 am
I've just read the new criteria - a surprising and welcome change IMO, particularly if it stops people milking the system for what is effectively a 'condition-less' 5 year visa.
Well done MOM.
-
Strong Eagle
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 11758
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
-
Answers: 11
- Location: Off The Red Dot
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Strong Eagle » Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:53 am
BillyB wrote:I've just read the new criteria - a surprising and welcome change IMO, particularly if it stops people milking the system for what is effectively a 'condition-less' 5 year visa.
Well done MOM.
I think Singapore has shot themselves in the foot... and maybe in the head. This has wiped out a lot of mid level candidates... $8k to $10K per month. Companies that would hire at $8K won't do it at $12K. Net effect... a lot of people going home... to the detriment of Singapore and it's companies.
-
BillyB
- Manager
![Manager Manager]()
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:01 pm
- Location: My laptop
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by BillyB » Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:04 pm
Strong Eagle wrote:BillyB wrote:I've just read the new criteria - a surprising and welcome change IMO, particularly if it stops people milking the system for what is effectively a 'condition-less' 5 year visa.
Well done MOM.
I think Singapore has shot themselves in the foot... and maybe in the head. This has wiped out a lot of mid level candidates... $8k to $10K per month. Companies that would hire at $8K won't do it at $12K. Net effect... a lot of people going home... to the detriment of Singapore and it's companies.
Surely they would just get an P1 employment pass in that case, or move to a P1 in the future if they were out of the range? Plus, if people want to stay, surely they'd accept a change in Visa type - it's not really a deal breaker.
It might take-up more processing time and be a pain in terms of administration, but if it narrows the net and the result is better quality foreigners, then I think that's a good thing.
I also believe it stops system abusers getting a 5 year visa with very favourable conditions without having any intention to commit to Singapore in the longer-term.
-
sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 40551
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
-
Answers: 21
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by sundaymorningstaple » Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:11 pm
BillyB, I tend to agree. There isn't anything wrong with going back on a P1, assuming that in 6 more months they don't raise the P1 entry level to 12K as well. Most PEP were P1's initially. The collateral damage (DPs) is the same for both, unless the PEP was originally a Q or P2, but they aren't going to make the 144K anyway.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
-
nakatago
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: Thunderbolts* HQ
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by nakatago » Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:35 pm
BillyB wrote:Strong Eagle wrote:BillyB wrote:I've just read the new criteria - a surprising and welcome change IMO, particularly if it stops people milking the system for what is effectively a 'condition-less' 5 year visa.
Well done MOM.
I think Singapore has shot themselves in the foot... and maybe in the head. This has wiped out a lot of mid level candidates... $8k to $10K per month. Companies that would hire at $8K won't do it at $12K. Net effect... a lot of people going home... to the detriment of Singapore and it's companies.
Surely they would just get an P1 employment pass in that case, or move to a P1 in the future if they were out of the range? Plus, if people want to stay, surely they'd accept a change in Visa type - it's not really a deal breaker.
It might take-up more processing time and be a pain in terms of administration, but if it narrows the net and the result is better quality foreigners, then I think that's a good thing.
I also believe it stops system abusers getting a 5 year visa with very favourable conditions without having any intention to commit to Singapore in the longer-term.
It only breaks the deal for people who want to bring dependents. Spouses and children, understandably still a big deal but parents and parents in law, not so much for most.
"A quokka is what would happen if there was an anime about kangaroos."
-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Wed, 21 Nov 2012 9:58 pm
For the first time I got some good news (to me), I got the approval for my PEP today... it comes as quite a big surprise as I also thought more likely I wouldn't get it given my salary range compare to the new requirements.
Thanks guys for the advises and comments. That's always helpful because at least I was better prepared for worst case...
-
Callput
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 5:23 pm
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by Callput » Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:54 pm
freeman.vu wrote:For the first time I got some good news (to me), I got the approval for my PEP today... it comes as quite a big surprise as I also thought more likely I wouldn't get it given my salary range compare to the new requirements.
Thanks guys for the advises and comments. That's always helpful because at least I was better prepared for worst case...
Congratulations but remember that it is a 2 year thing.
One. Potential issue I see is end of 2014 there will be 1000s of pep holders losing their visa at that point too many employers will throng mom with ep applications, wonder how many will get approved
-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:40 pm
Thanks CallPut. That's true but it doesn't change the picture much as consider on average the length of EP is 2 years, so it's also about the time for EP holders to renew right?
To me its still like long a Call with not expensive premium

-
freeman.vu
- Regular
![Regular Regular]()
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 7:18 pm
-
Contact:
-
Quote
-
0
login to like this post
Post
by freeman.vu » Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:47 pm
Oops, I have another question to bother you bosses
My in-principle approval is valid until April 2013. But the new requirements will have effect coming Dec. Does it mean I need to collect the PEP by end of this month?
-
-
- 3 Replies
- 20095 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Sat, 05 Jun 2021 5:13 pm
-
-
PEP with outstanding PR Application
Replies: 4
First post
Hi All
Anyone have any views on this. Should I need to apply for a PEP while I am waiting for results of a PR application, would my PEP application...
Last post
You are welcome. :cool:
- 4 Replies
- 1978 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Tue, 28 Sep 2021 8:13 pm
-
-
- 0 Replies
- 2662 Views
-
Last post by KevinBanes
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:50 am
-
-
PEP application - last drawn salary
Replies: 8
First post
I am currently on a EP. My EP expires in Dec, however my last drawn salary will be in Oct. Can I apply for PEP in Dec or do I need to apply in Oct? I...
Last post
Is there a reason you can't just apply for the PEP NOW before you stop drawing a salary? Processing time is not exactly short to begin with and...
- 8 Replies
- 2219 Views
-
Last post by Justgotfired
Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:15 am
-
-
PEP application for dependents
Hi, I am preparing my PEP application and realize that there is no information required of my dependents. I'm wondering how I can apply for passes...
- 0 Replies
- 1027 Views
-
Last post by Justgotfired
Tue, 23 Aug 2022 3:16 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests