the outlook seems pretty good for now(specially in contract logistics), while shipping seems to be suffering due to the obvious glut of supply and reduced global trade. On another note, singapore's LNG terminal expansion to offer more opportunities?

contract logistics are when a logistics service provider takes over the supply chain of another company promising to run it under a stipulated contract.Strong Eagle wrote:I don't know what "contract logistics" are but I do know that most MNC's are combining IT and logistics under a single unit since so much of IT is about supply chain.
I didn't say logistics. I said supply chain. Once you get past financial systems, the far larger and more complex IT systems are supply chain... as you know, everything from inbound materials shipping, warehousing, customs, etc, to everything outbound... and the vendor, material, scheduling databases that must all support it.AndrewV wrote:combining IT and logistics under a single unit?
Strong Eagle wrote:I didn't say logistics. I said supply chain. Once you get past financial systems, the far larger and more complex IT systems are supply chain... as you know, everything from inbound materials shipping, warehousing, customs, etc, to everything outbound... and the vendor, material, scheduling databases that must all support it.AndrewV wrote:combining IT and logistics under a single unit?
The demand model for IT services is changing. What used to be an "IT department" providing services to other departments is morphing into becoming an adjunct to the most important service areas, supply chain being one of them, finance another, and HR yet a third.
So what I'm saying is that rather than some CIO exercising demand management and setting priorities for systems, the supply chain VP will set the priorities and needs, to be coordinated by the CIO with other similar integrations.
Good insight from the users perspective of supply chain. From the providers perspective (dedicated shipping/logistics company's), they are more open to modernization of their systems to keep in line with developing trends. Most company's are getting rid of their 20 year old mainframes and switching to solutions such as Oracle TM, JDA, Manhattan Asociates, etc...Strong Eagle wrote:It changes the budget model, too. Your division will still be billed for the infrastructure to support IT, but instead of being billed for your SAP systems, etc, they become the responsibility of the supply chain division... so that cost accountability is more effectively placed where it needs to be.
It's not about supply chain processes, it's about FIRE SAFETY and chickenshit firms like Walmart refusing to pay for additional fire safety upgrades.AndrewV wrote:Looks like the Fire in the bangladesh factory is getting people talking about supply chain processes and standardization again. Walmart is relooking at their Chain.
you maybe right, but the various lawsuits its facing and it's share price reflects that people are watching this unravel with interest.Strong Eagle wrote:It's not about supply chain processes, it's about FIRE SAFETY and chickenshit firms like Walmart refusing to pay for additional fire safety upgrades.AndrewV wrote:Looks like the Fire in the bangladesh factory is getting people talking about supply chain processes and standardization again. Walmart is relooking at their Chain.
Walmart doesn't need to look at their 'chain', they need to look at their worthless record for employee rights to see why they couldn't join a consortium of clothing makers that were going to spend USD 20 million to improve fire safety in 70 factories.
F*ck Walmart. And f*ck the Waltons.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests