BEWARE: Shocking Privacy Violation in Singapore Caught

Discuss about life in Singapore. Ask about cost of living, housing, travel, etiquette & lifestyle. Share experience & advice with Singaporeans & expat staying in Singapore.
Locked
landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:01 pm

offshoreoildude wrote:
x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.

Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Re: BEWARE: Shocking Privacy Violation in Singapore Caught

Post by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:06 pm

x9200 wrote:
landlordfromhell wrote:
x9200 wrote: Why he or anyone else would bother? This is yours and only yours problem. You don't believe in it, fine and good luck.
If you guys don't bother, why reply? you are very funny.
Because in principle we want to help but as with everything it has its limits and its rights. If you are turning like this the limits are already behind and the principle is you should clarify doubts. I earlier suggested to you to verify it with your lawyers. Sorry, I am not going to pay mine to do this for you. Ultimately and again, whether you like it or not it is your and not our problem.
Did I say it's your problem to begin with? If you do not want to help, you are more than welcome to leave this thread. Also judging from your statements, I don't want your help anyways. I don't know what's your problem with all these sarcastic remarks. Please just leave the issue to the others, goodbye.

offshoreoildude
Manager
Manager
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 9:45 pm

Post by offshoreoildude » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:07 pm

landlordfromhell wrote:
offshoreoildude wrote:
x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.

Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.
You know what? I don't have to. And that's the point, you're defaming your LL in public - and no one has to even see it to understand that he has been defamed. You've been given good free advice, you've got a judgement in your favour - now grow up - stop putting stuff on the internet that you will get you sued and go and get your money. You think I'm joking? You live in defamation city.

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:08 pm

offshoreoildude wrote:
x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.

Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:10 pm

offshoreoildude wrote:
landlordfromhell wrote:
offshoreoildude wrote: No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.
You know what? I don't have to. And that's the point, you're defaming your LL in public - and no one has to even see it to understand that he has been defamed. You've been given good free advice, you've got a judgement in your favour - now grow up - stop putting stuff on the internet that you will get you sued and go and get your money. You think I'm joking? You live in defamation city.
If I could get my money, I would, but I cannot. Get the point? I guess not.

offshoreoildude
Manager
Manager
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 9:45 pm

Post by offshoreoildude » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:24 pm

landlordfromhell wrote:
offshoreoildude wrote:
x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.

Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?
Because;

1. He has deeper pockets (he's not a broke ass renter) and 2. You have no real way of proving the video was made for anything except defaming him which is I suspect, why you made it. Before you go play outside, learn the rules of the playground. You don't take on a bigger man without understanding how to fight dirty. Perhaps he'll never hear about it or notice it or you'll have the brains to take the video down first.

User avatar
Strong Eagle
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
Location: Off The Red Dot
Contact:

Post by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:09 am

I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.

Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.

So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.

Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:43 am

offshoreoildude wrote:
landlordfromhell wrote:
offshoreoildude wrote: No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.

SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD

The Cause of Action

21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.

21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?
Because;

1. He has deeper pockets (he's not a broke ass renter) and 2. You have no real way of proving the video was made for anything except defaming him which is I suspect, why you made it. Before you go play outside, learn the rules of the playground. You don't take on a bigger man without understanding how to fight dirty. Perhaps he'll never hear about it or notice it or you'll have the brains to take the video down first.
You're such a stupid faggot ass. Go home to your trailer troll.

User avatar
Strong Eagle
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
Location: Off The Red Dot
Contact:

Post by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:45 am

landlordfromhell, One more post like the one above, and it is bye bye for you. You have been warned. Stop it or you will be banned.

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46 am

Strong Eagle wrote:I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.

Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.

So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.

Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.
I can tell you lack basic English knowledge. If you read enough, you'll know all defamation bullshit is false and has been proven in court. LL failed to show up, he's on the losing end.

Now go quietly back to your six battery road trailer troll.

landlordfromhell
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am

Post by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:47 am

Strong Eagle wrote:landlordfromhell, One more post like the one above, and it is bye bye for you. You have been warned. Stop it or you will be banned.
I'll bet you banned every newbie around here. Not the first time I bet, eh?

User avatar
Strong Eagle
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
Location: Off The Red Dot
Contact:

Post by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:49 am

landlordfromhell wrote:
Strong Eagle wrote:I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.

Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.

So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.

Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.
I can tell you lack basic English knowledge. If you read enough, you'll know all defamation bullshit is false and has been proven in court. LL failed to show up, he's on the losing end.

Now go quietly back to your six battery road trailer troll.
[-X I warned you. Plus, you have posted from no fewer than 13 anonymized (proxy server) IP addresses, all marked as spammers.

If you want your links removed, it will be necessary for you to contact the board administrator.

Bye bye. :wave:

x9200
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9862
Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
Location: Singapore

Post by x9200 » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 7:39 am

This thread is a good example why posts with the clear purpose of personal vendetta are typically deleted right after they appear. Especially if they come from a person who got registered only for that reason.
Looks like we missed this one.

User avatar
the lynx
Governor
Governor
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 6:29 pm
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:

Post by the lynx » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 8:38 am

Better lock this thread, I guess. I think we have enough drama up there already and we don't want to add anymore.

x9200
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9862
Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
Location: Singapore

Post by x9200 » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 8:49 am

Yep, good suggestion.

Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Staying, Living in Singapore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: joanli and 11 guests