Discuss about life in Singapore. Ask about cost of living, housing, travel, etiquette & lifestyle. Share experience & advice with Singaporeans & expat staying in Singapore.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:01 pm
offshoreoildude wrote:x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.
Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:06 pm
x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell wrote:x9200 wrote:
Why he or anyone else would bother? This is yours and only yours problem. You don't believe in it, fine and good luck.
If you guys don't bother, why reply? you are very funny.
Because in principle we want to help but as with everything it has its limits and its rights. If you are turning like this the limits are already behind and the principle is you should clarify doubts. I earlier suggested to you to verify it with your lawyers. Sorry, I am not going to pay mine to do this for you. Ultimately and again, whether you like it or not it is your and not our problem.
Did I say it's your problem to begin with? If you do not want to help, you are more than welcome to leave this thread. Also judging from your statements, I don't want your help anyways. I don't know what's your problem with all these sarcastic remarks. Please just leave the issue to the others, goodbye.
-
offshoreoildude
- Manager
![Manager Manager]()
- Posts: 1582
- Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 9:45 pm
Post
by offshoreoildude » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:07 pm
landlordfromhell wrote:offshoreoildude wrote:x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.
Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.
You know what? I don't have to. And that's the point, you're defaming your LL in public - and no one has to even see it to understand that he has been defamed. You've been given good free advice, you've got a judgement in your favour - now grow up - stop putting stuff on the internet that you will get you sued and go and get your money. You think I'm joking? You live in defamation city.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:08 pm
offshoreoildude wrote:x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.
Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:10 pm
offshoreoildude wrote:landlordfromhell wrote:offshoreoildude wrote:
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
Malicious Falsehood? Seriously guy, you haven't even watched the video. Looks like you are in the wrong thread.
You know what? I don't have to. And that's the point, you're defaming your LL in public - and no one has to even see it to understand that he has been defamed. You've been given good free advice, you've got a judgement in your favour - now grow up - stop putting stuff on the internet that you will get you sued and go and get your money. You think I'm joking? You live in defamation city.
If I could get my money, I would, but I cannot. Get the point? I guess not.
-
offshoreoildude
- Manager
![Manager Manager]()
- Posts: 1582
- Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 9:45 pm
Post
by offshoreoildude » Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:24 pm
landlordfromhell wrote:offshoreoildude wrote:x9200 wrote:landlordfromhell, offshoreoildude, please... do not get the discussion to the ad personam level. Both of you.
Moderator
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?
Because;
1. He has deeper pockets (he's not a broke ass renter) and 2. You have no real way of proving the video was made for anything except defaming him which is I suspect, why you made it. Before you go play outside, learn the rules of the playground. You don't take on a bigger man without understanding how to fight dirty. Perhaps he'll never hear about it or notice it or you'll have the brains to take the video down first.
-
Strong Eagle
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 11739
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Off The Red Dot
-
Contact:
Post
by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:09 am
I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.
Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.
So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.
Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:43 am
offshoreoildude wrote:landlordfromhell wrote:offshoreoildude wrote:
No problem - I'm sure we'll read about our young friend in the press soon enough when he's sued for MF.
SECTION 6 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD
The Cause of Action
21.6.1 A person is liable for malicious falsehood if he or she maliciously makes false representations in respect of another with a view to injure that person’s goodwill or economic reputation.
21.6.2 The tort of malicious falsehood may, in some respects, overlap with the tort of defamation (see Section 7 below). However, these two torts are clearly distinct. In particular, the tort of malicious falsehood is founded on (a) false representations, (b) malicious motives, and (c) the complainant’s incurrence of special damage, but none of these is a necessary element of the tort of defamation.
LMAO, he did not show up to court when I sued him, so why should I show up when he sues me?
Because;
1. He has deeper pockets (he's not a broke ass renter) and 2. You have no real way of proving the video was made for anything except defaming him which is I suspect, why you made it. Before you go play outside, learn the rules of the playground. You don't take on a bigger man without understanding how to fight dirty. Perhaps he'll never hear about it or notice it or you'll have the brains to take the video down first.
You're such a stupid faggot ass. Go home to your trailer troll.
-
Strong Eagle
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 11739
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Off The Red Dot
-
Contact:
Post
by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:45 am
landlordfromhell, One more post like the one above, and it is bye bye for you. You have been warned. Stop it or you will be banned.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:46 am
Strong Eagle wrote:I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.
Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.
So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.
Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.
I can tell you lack basic English knowledge. If you read enough, you'll know all defamation bullshit is false and has been proven in court. LL failed to show up, he's on the losing end.
Now go quietly back to your six battery road trailer troll.
-
landlordfromhell
- Member
![Member Member]()
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 3:16 am
Post
by landlordfromhell » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:47 am
Strong Eagle wrote:landlordfromhell, One more post like the one above, and it is bye bye for you. You have been warned. Stop it or you will be banned.
I'll bet you banned every newbie around here. Not the first time I bet, eh?
-
Strong Eagle
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 11739
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
-
Answers: 10
- Location: Off The Red Dot
-
Contact:
Post
by Strong Eagle » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:49 am
landlordfromhell wrote:Strong Eagle wrote:I can just about guarantee you that landlordfromhell will be on the short end of a defamation lawsuit.
Simply put, the law in Singapore assumes that any claim of defamation is true until the defendant proves that it is not true.
So... you call your landlord a scheming, thieving scumbag and he files a lawsuit. Now, please prove that he is a scheming, thieving scumbag... all three assertions, BTW.
Now, you've posted semi-nude video of your LL along with derogatory comments. You've called him a "perverted and dishonest man". Explain how you are going to prove that you have not defamed him? How are you going to prove up that he is perverted? Running around in your room in his underwear probably won't be enough. Bzzzzt!!! You lose.
I can tell you lack basic English knowledge. If you read enough, you'll know all defamation bullshit is false and has been proven in court. LL failed to show up, he's on the losing end.
Now go quietly back to your six battery road trailer troll.

I warned you. Plus, you have posted from no fewer than 13 anonymized (proxy server) IP addresses, all marked as spammers.
If you want your links removed, it will be necessary for you to contact the board administrator.
Bye bye.

-
x9200
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
- Location: Singapore
Post
by x9200 » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 7:39 am
This thread is a good example why posts with the clear purpose of personal vendetta are typically deleted right after they appear. Especially if they come from a person who got registered only for that reason.
Looks like we missed this one.
-
the lynx
- Governor
![Governor Governor]()
- Posts: 5281
- Joined: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 6:29 pm
- Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location:
Post
by the lynx » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 8:38 am
Better lock this thread, I guess. I think we have enough drama up there already and we don't want to add anymore.
-
x9200
- Moderator
![Moderator Moderator]()
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
- Location: Singapore
Post
by x9200 » Tue, 25 Sep 2012 8:49 am
Yep, good suggestion.
-
-
Social Distancing Violation - Fines
Replies: 12
First post
What’s the penalty for violations on social distancing , ie gatherings? Saw yesterday a group of 4 (expats) in a park getting questioned by a group...
Last post
Guess the law did not change … just a question what they will impose now for first time offenders … And whether it is still 300
- 12 Replies
- 9155 Views
-
Last post by mcquiry
Mon, 09 Aug 2021 8:16 pm
-
-
Singapore Expats - "Privacy policy"
Replies: 2
First post
Your information for your account at “Singapore Expats” is protected by data-protection laws applicable in the country that hosts us. Any information...
Last post
Did you have to give any other information beyond the User Name, Password & email address?
I don't believe you did.
- 2 Replies
- 3054 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Mon, 29 Jun 2020 5:43 pm
-
-
Caught Shoplifting
Replies: 2
First post
Hi all, I was caught shoplifting about two months back and I am still studying and this is my first offence. I have learnt my mistake already and I...
Last post
What was the dollar amount for the item you were caught ?? Is there any prior convictions for you ??
- 2 Replies
- 2722 Views
-
Last post by Jenifer_37
Sat, 04 Jul 2020 4:23 pm
-
-
Anyone caught Barbenheimer?
Replies: 13
First post
Barbie and Oppenheimer has been all over the news and social media. I haven't made it down to the movies yet, was wondering if anyone has caught...
Last post
There are some explicit sexual scenes. Not needed IMO.
I'd think a historical film is important for all to see, don't understand the rating. It's...
- 13 Replies
- 4812 Views
-
Last post by Lisafuller
Sun, 30 Jul 2023 2:57 am
-
-
LTVP caught working?
Replies: 2
First post
If an LTVP is caught working in SG without a LOC, is the sponsor also in trouble if they didn't know?
Last post
Just curious. Why not just get the LOC. the process is not difficult
- 2 Replies
- 4864 Views
-
Last post by JWNYsg
Tue, 19 Sep 2023 8:52 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests