It's all about whatever you (the expat) can negotiate. There is no 'standard'. As alluded to by Norin, the number of expats who negotiate for and receive schooling assistance is dramatically lower than it may have been a few years ago. I know (many) expats making $5-10k/month with no other reimbursements, and I know one friend of a friend who makes $30k/month and has his $14k/month 4-bed penthouse (he's single) off Orchard reimbursed, but complains about how unfair it is he doesn't have a car allowance and needs to take MRT every day from Somerset to Raffle's place.ddarling wrote:I need some help in determining what is the "norm" when it comes to dependent schooling. British expat wants to put their child in school at 3.5 years old. I understand that in the U.K. at this age, there is 15 hours of nursery school provided by the government but not sure this should be something the company needs to pay for, but of course want to be fair. Can you please give me a sense on what your companies are doing for you in this regard? Would it be unresonable to say the company pays for schooling starting the first regular year?
Thanks for your imput.
It isn't just "rich expats" who receive schooling benefits. That you don't says something about your company, not the OP.NorrinRadd wrote:Nothing. Our companies contribute nothing. It's all out of pocket.
Perhaps you mistook this forum for the Rich Expat Forum, or Camelot. It is neither. Although this is a silly place.
And for those who missed the obscure reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Npo0cmp-VYmovingtospore wrote:OP, if you are in HR, you should know the answer to this question.
What I would say is, if you want to keep this employee in Singapore for more than a few years you better pay for schools. Otherwise, he or she, like hundreds and thousands of other expats here, will come for a couple of years, get fed up and leave.
The way I look at it is, the Singapore government, along with population growth here, has made it next to impossible for foreigners to enroll in local schools. So, we have no other choice. So if the government isn't going to truly welcome foreigners and make the school system inclusive, then the companies bringing people here should be responsible for schooling costs.
That's not necessarily the reality though.
I think you have your answer. Being in HR, I don't have to tell you it would probably be 10x more expensive to have to replace this employee than pay for the pre-school. Tell him you'll pay for NTUCddarling wrote:. Part of me says no way, the other part says just pay the extra to deep a great employee happy and wanting to stay. It just becomes hard to convince the money guys.
Unfortunately, this just isn't true. As a foreigner just arrived here, you can't get a place in local schools (though probably could in nursery). If you're a PR it is much easier - but - very difficult to get PR if you've just arrived. Or at all these days.BigSis wrote:That one child in nursery often becomes 2 or 3 children in nursery upwards as families expand.
And they always have the local school option - although you still have to pay something for those as an expat. Maybe you could have a local school policy - you will pay the cost of local school and if they choose to send their kids private, they foot the rest of the bill.
Schooling in the home countries is free if it is the equivalent of local school - there is the option of private schools in all of our home countries but there's a reason we don't send our kids there and that's because they are expensive. If they weren't sending their kids private at home, why go private here?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests