i dont think the law takes too nicely to secretly recorded conversation, hence why companies always say "call will be recorded for training and coaching purposes". it seems you have to give a heads up, which we all know is stupid in some cases.tan_andrei wrote:Yes. I awared that Women Charter will defintely disadvantage to me in most circumtances. But I am not too sure if I still need to pay for her maintenance even she convicted adultery?
And I know it's pretty expensive to hire private detective in Singapore and might end up no result. I was wonder if I confronted my wife and if she admitted to have external affair. Will it be considered as valid evidence if I recorded (with video) it secretly on the whole conversation?
You think wrongly. Besides, you are comparing apples to oranges. Its a different situation when a company records its clients for the companies training purposes and when you record a conversation you are a part of for court evidence reasons.sensei_ wrote:i dont think the law takes too nicely to secretly recorded conversation, hence why companies always say "call will be recorded for training and coaching purposes".
happy to be corrected if wrong. another case of mine admittedly in oz and not singapore. but i was recording a telephone conversation with someone who had damaged my property. when i fronted up in pre trial with it, it was dismissed because i didnt give adequate warning about me recording the telephone conversation.x9200 wrote:You think wrongly. Besides, you are comparing apples to oranges. Its a different situation when a company records its clients for the companies training purposes and when you record a conversation you are a part of for court evidence reasons.
secret recordings (legally obtained AND retained) are admissible in singapore courts.sensei_ wrote:happy to be corrected if wrong. another case of mine admittedly in oz and not singapore. but i was recording a telephone conversation with someone who had damaged my property. when i fronted up in pre trial with it, it was dismissed because i didnt give adequate warning about me recording the telephone conversation.x9200 wrote:You think wrongly. Besides, you are comparing apples to oranges. Its a different situation when a company records its clients for the companies training purposes and when you record a conversation you are a part of for court evidence reasons.
was i given wrong info? quite possibly. will i do it again? most definitely.
you can negotiate this amount with her. it can be a nominal/token sum or nothing at all, but i personally know women (quite a few) who chose a $1 to $10 maintenance "just in case"...tan_andrei wrote:...Women Charter will defintely disadvantage to me in most circumtances. But I am not too sure if I still need to pay for her maintenance even she convicted adultery?
you seem to want a lot of things. i'm not sure if it's realistic to think that what you want will be possible.tan_andrei wrote:...But she start to less caring on son after since she had affair with that guy. No longer teaching him and always spend her time on texting or updating her weibo till midnight. As I no longer allowed to sleep with my son, and he will not sleep till mummy sleep together.
My current concern is I am pretty sure divorce will definitely hurt my son deep but I can’t let my wife continue in this manner.
a. Divorce while owning my kid’s custody as well as my house ownership.
b. Purchase date of my house is 01-Oct-2007 which doesn’t meet the MOP of 5years per below HDB regulation till Oct-12
c. Since I learned to know my wife adultery in Apr’12, so will it be too late to file divorce after Oct’12 in order to meet the MOP? Or is there any success case that keeps the house ownership although MOP not met in past due to similar circumstances?
It's sometimes hard to guess really. In Europe it is definitely allowed. In the States probably not. In Singapore there is not too much protection of the privacy but generally it seems to be similar to EU in the discussed context. What is clearly not allowed is to overcome any clear protection (temper/tap/break into/hack etc) in order to listen to someones else conversation.sensei_ wrote:happy to be corrected if wrong. another case of mine admittedly in oz and not singapore. but i was recording a telephone conversation with someone who had damaged my property. when i fronted up in pre trial with it, it was dismissed because i didnt give adequate warning about me recording the telephone conversation.x9200 wrote:You think wrongly. Besides, you are comparing apples to oranges. Its a different situation when a company records its clients for the companies training purposes and when you record a conversation you are a part of for court evidence reasons.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest