SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Quick Advice - DP Holder Being A Shareholder.....
- Saint
- Director
- Posts: 3505
- Joined: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 5:19 pm
- Location: The Juban Stand, Boat Quay
- Contact:
Quick Advice - DP Holder Being A Shareholder.....
If a company is setup with 4 Shareholders, 2 being PR, 1 Local and 1 DP holder. For the DP holder (Shareholder) to actively work for the Company the DP still needs to apply for LOC or EP?
Being some smart arse says read through the sticky thread, I did and no definite answer.
Being some smart arse says read through the sticky thread, I did and no definite answer.
- sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
- Posts: 40015
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
I'd say either one, depending on ones qualifications. The odds of getting the LoC are a lot greater than getting the EP though. With the EP, you will be thrown into the current "Policies" and tightening criteria wars, while if you are here on a DP then you're limited to the duration of your tethered sponsor's EP. This obviously isn't you we're talking about......
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
- Saint
- Director
- Posts: 3505
- Joined: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 5:19 pm
- Location: The Juban Stand, Boat Quay
- Contact:
I'm one of the PRs! I'm just trying to find out the legality of a DP holder who is a shareholder working for the Company. I was having this discusion with someone and they thought a Shareholder could legally work by not drawing a salary but just dividends.
The stupid situation is we are using the DP holder as the Shareholder as the her hubby holds a PEP so can't be a Shareholder. However the PEP holder can legally work for the Company but the DP shareholder can't!?!
The stupid situation is we are using the DP holder as the Shareholder as the her hubby holds a PEP so can't be a Shareholder. However the PEP holder can legally work for the Company but the DP shareholder can't!?!
- sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
- Posts: 40015
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
Either/Or. But it would be easier to go for the LoC because an LoC holder does not have to "qualify" for the LoC like an EP holder would.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
- Strong Eagle
- Moderator
- Posts: 11504
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
- Location: Off The Red Dot
- Contact:
Not correct. First, a shareholder is a completely separate entity from employees or directors of a company. Shareholders can receive dividends regardless of whether they are employed by the company... in fact, the only criteria is that for a given class of stock every shareholder must receive dividends in proportion to ownership.Saint wrote:I'm one of the PRs! I'm just trying to find out the legality of a DP holder who is a shareholder working for the Company. I was having this discusion with someone and they thought a Shareholder could legally work by not drawing a salary but just dividends.
The stupid situation is we are using the DP holder as the Shareholder as the her hubby holds a PEP so can't be a Shareholder. However the PEP holder can legally work for the Company but the DP shareholder can't!?!
Second, I am aware of no rule that says a PEP cannot hold shares in a company. Again, this is not being employed by a company, it is owning shares. A PEP cannot hold other employment, and thus cannot be a an executive or operational director. In theory, a PEP could be an outside director but this might look fishy in a small company.
Third, a shareholder cannot legally work unless they have authorization, and in this case, that would be a LOC for the DP.
Strong Eagle wrote:Not correct. First, a shareholder is a completely separate entity from employees or directors of a company. Shareholders can receive dividends regardless of whether they are employed by the company... in fact, the only criteria is that for a given class of stock every shareholder must receive dividends in proportion to ownership.Saint wrote:I'm one of the PRs! I'm just trying to find out the legality of a DP holder who is a shareholder working for the Company. I was having this discusion with someone and they thought a Shareholder could legally work by not drawing a salary but just dividends.
The stupid situation is we are using the DP holder as the Shareholder as the her hubby holds a PEP so can't be a Shareholder. However the PEP holder can legally work for the Company but the DP shareholder can't!?!
Second, I am aware of no rule that says a PEP cannot hold shares in a company. Again, this is not being employed by a company, it is owning shares. A PEP cannot hold other employment, and thus cannot be a an executive or operational director. In theory, a PEP could be an outside director but this might look fishy in a small company.
Third, a shareholder cannot legally work unless they have authorization, and in this case, that would be a LOC for the DP.
I beg to differ about shareholder & PEP, Saint is correct
Direct quote from MOM website:
The following groups of foreigners are not eligible for the PEP:
[...]
(iii) foreigners who are listed as Sole Proprietors, Partners or Directors in a business/company registered with ACRA and are shareholders of that business/company.
Link to the full text : http://www.mom.gov.sg/foreign-manpower/ ... fault.aspx
That's why I'm the shareholder of my hubby's company... at the time of constituting it he had a PEP

He can however hold shares of any other companies
- Strong Eagle
- Moderator
- Posts: 11504
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
- Location: Off The Red Dot
- Contact:
There is an "and" in that statement. If you are not a director, partner, or SP of "that" (ie -the same company) then you can own shares.merichan wrote:Strong Eagle wrote:Not correct. First, a shareholder is a completely separate entity from employees or directors of a company. Shareholders can receive dividends regardless of whether they are employed by the company... in fact, the only criteria is that for a given class of stock every shareholder must receive dividends in proportion to ownership.Saint wrote:I'm one of the PRs! I'm just trying to find out the legality of a DP holder who is a shareholder working for the Company. I was having this discusion with someone and they thought a Shareholder could legally work by not drawing a salary but just dividends.
The stupid situation is we are using the DP holder as the Shareholder as the her hubby holds a PEP so can't be a Shareholder. However the PEP holder can legally work for the Company but the DP shareholder can't!?!
Second, I am aware of no rule that says a PEP cannot hold shares in a company. Again, this is not being employed by a company, it is owning shares. A PEP cannot hold other employment, and thus cannot be a an executive or operational director. In theory, a PEP could be an outside director but this might look fishy in a small company.
Third, a shareholder cannot legally work unless they have authorization, and in this case, that would be a LOC for the DP.
I beg to differ about shareholder & PEP, Saint is correct
Direct quote from MOM website:
The following groups of foreigners are not eligible for the PEP:
[...]
(iii) foreigners who are listed as Sole Proprietors, Partners or Directors in a business/company registered with ACRA and are shareholders of that business/company.
Link to the full text : http://www.mom.gov.sg/foreign-manpower/ ... fault.aspx
That's why I'm the shareholder of my hubby's company... at the time of constituting it he had a PEP
He can however hold shares of any other companies
This statement exists to keep PEP's from getting around Entrepass rules by forming a company, then working for it. MOM may well see through your trick of being the shareholder... the end game is obvious.
I just wanted to point that Saint was correctly interpreting the rules of the PEP saying that he had to have the DP of the PEP made shareholder in his case.
as his PEP holder could not indeed become the shareholder of the company he is working in
the AND in that sentence can be interpreted both ways, and it seems from our discussions with MOM that they tend to interpret it more as an either than a both conditions must be filled.
Nothing more nothing else...
as his PEP holder could not indeed become the shareholder of the company he is working in
the AND in that sentence can be interpreted both ways, and it seems from our discussions with MOM that they tend to interpret it more as an either than a both conditions must be filled.
Nothing more nothing else...
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 9:40 am
Re:
Can DP holder of a PEP holder be the major shareholder while setting up a company in singapore, without the LOC? i.e just the share-holder, not an employee!merichan wrote:I just wanted to point that Saint was correctly interpreting the rules of the PEP saying that he had to have the DP of the PEP made shareholder in his case.
as his PEP holder could not indeed become the shareholder of the company he is working in
the AND in that sentence can be interpreted both ways, and it seems from our discussions with MOM that they tend to interpret it more as an either than a both conditions must be filled.
Nothing more nothing else...
- Strong Eagle
- Moderator
- Posts: 11504
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
- Location: Off The Red Dot
- Contact:
Re: Re:
Yes, but because you are a DP, you cannot be a director. Therefore, you will need to acquire a "normally resident" person to be the director of your company.ozymandius wrote:merichan wrote:Can DP holder of a PEP holder be the major shareholder while setting up a company in singapore, without the LOC? i.e just the share-holder, not an employee!
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Shareholder data, PDPA, and moving to a different accountant
by cattleherder » Wed, 08 Jul 2020 3:17 pm » in Business in Singapore - 7 Replies
- 2260 Views
-
Last post by cattleherder
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 3:45 pm
-
-
-
Why are we NOT being given an anti-body test after being double jabbed?
by musical box » Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:18 am » in Beauty, Health & Fitness - 18 Replies
- 9033 Views
-
Last post by BBCDoc
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 6:45 am
-
-
-
A quick question about nuvaring
by Chrissanth » Sat, 23 Jun 2018 12:29 pm » in Beauty, Health & Fitness - 0 Replies
- 1412 Views
-
Last post by Chrissanth
Sat, 23 Jun 2018 12:29 pm
-
-
- 10 Replies
- 3586 Views
-
Last post by iaannuk
Mon, 09 Jul 2018 9:29 pm
-
-
A quick question about the lavender
by Dominich » Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:19 am » in Beauty, Health & Fitness - 6 Replies
- 2274 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Sat, 07 Jul 2018 3:18 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests