Oh, they're everywhere. You never see hotel 81, or Fragrance hotel? Lots of non-chain ones too.carteki wrote: Another problem is the lack of "short term hotels". They're very popular in Japan (another very crowded place).
Oh, they're everywhere. You never see hotel 81, or Fragrance hotel? Lots of non-chain ones too.carteki wrote: Another problem is the lack of "short term hotels". They're very popular in Japan (another very crowded place).
Some aren't even opting for one!revhappy wrote:Heard this from the locals, that not too long ago, may be the 70's the gahmen discouraged couples from having more than 2 kids. It seems there used to be an ad in the TV and a family with lots of kids grabbing buns and then the last child didn't have any left. Final tagline was 2 is enough!
I don't think it's about money, wealthy countries seem to have a lower birth rate than those on the other end of the spectrum.revhappy wrote:Come on guys, I dont think living with parents is such a big factor with low birth rates. They would still have their own room, or atleast most of them, wont they?
The main reason is the east v/s the west thinking difference. The west have always been rich and the way they have become rich is by living like there is no tomorrow.
The east is in the transition phase from poor to getting richer and richer and richer and the way the east is getting rich is by accumulating wealth and not spending it off. You cannot accumulate wealth and enjoy the material benefits and also have children the same time.
Although Singapore has already gotten there, many developing countries in the east are in the same path.
I agree that is also a big factor. The westerners look for the right partner. The conservative easterns(like India) believe in arranged marriages, which actually work brillantly, even though there are lots of cases of unhappy marriages and the wife/husband still putting up with each other just for the sake of it.aster wrote:I don't think it's about money, wealthy countries seem to have a lower birth rate than those on the other end of the spectrum.revhappy wrote:Come on guys, I dont think living with parents is such a big factor with low birth rates. They would still have their own room, or atleast most of them, wont they?
The main reason is the east v/s the west thinking difference. The west have always been rich and the way they have become rich is by living like there is no tomorrow.
The east is in the transition phase from poor to getting richer and richer and richer and the way the east is getting rich is by accumulating wealth and not spending it off. You cannot accumulate wealth and enjoy the material benefits and also have children the same time.
Although Singapore has already gotten there, many developing countries in the east are in the same path.
Or actually it is, but in a different way. A very long time ago I read a Singaporean book titled "No Money, No Honey" and it basically compared the typical social outlook to that of prostitution. Apparently the main thing that many women look for in a man here is quite simply put... wealth. So the emphasis is not on finding the right partner and having a big family but finding a rich husband so that life can be grand and easy.Neil Humphreys has a nice dig at this from the kiasuism perspective, where kids are steered towards success equated with future wealth and that leaves no room for any other measure of happiness. Don't do sports, don't give acting a try, don't think about anything else apart from a future job that carries big wages.
"Anyone can have bad breath, Marge, but you can knock a buzzard off a shitwagon!"Singapore is neither here nor there. Its takes a lot of effort to get married here. You see how much makeup and stuff people here need to do to woo their partners. You find Indians not using deo or poor dressing sense is because they dont need to do it to woo partners. Their parents set up everything for them.
Well said MS! Now you guys get out there and have a quick knee shakeMad Scientist wrote:To be fair, all aspect of socio development and racial intergration in SG was the brainchild of Harry. What he has seen and done during the 60s moulded his thinking going forward. As Chinese race was his main support base, he has to ensure that this support base does not erode into oblivion. At the same time he cannot ignore the Malay/Muslim . He needs the Indian race for him to pick their brains. So the rest were sidelines as a result.
Look at Loong he is doing the same old thing. His cabinet ministers is a replica of Harry's years ago.
Throwing freebies and rebates does not always work. The people will get use to it and they will want more. Nothing will satisfy them hence the memememe syndrome comes into effect.
If materialistic gain in SG is an upmost important, where do you have time to procreate ? Aint gonna happen!!
In conclusion, he tried to play GOD and screwed up the whole thing and the generations after him suffers.
Users browsing this forum: vap0r_w4ve and 2 guests