I never understood that--why do you need to maintain racial ratios? How can they tell someone with a straight face that it's not racism?JR8 wrote:Therein lies the bind.
The rulers want SG to remain convincingly (75%+) Chinese. But the Chinese appear to put money before punoney (sorry)
What to do, as they say?
I LOL'd at that.Mi Amigo wrote:Why don't they just give out one free curry puff per day for the first five years of every newborn infant's life? Problem solved!JR8 wrote:What to do, as they say?
That's preposterous!Mi Amigo wrote:Why don't they just give out one free curry puff per day for the first five years of every newborn infant's life? Problem solved!JR8 wrote:What to do, as they say?
Interesting, because I always thought that the Chinese had it easy with the grandparents taking care of the kids to such a large extent.JR8 wrote:Bottom four countries are all wealthy and Chinese dominated.
That's some coincidence!
p.s. arguably all islands too .... spooky
years ago, when the baby bonus scheme was introduced ... a then colleague of mine seriously did a calculation and decided that having more than 2 children actually was financially worthwhile .. oh, well, her house, which was a joint apartment, under the then allowed scheme of allowing HDB house owners buying the next unit and merging - so 5 bedrooms in all, and was fully paid up by then, and that may have worked in her favour as well ..curiousgeorge wrote:I LOL'd at that.Mi Amigo wrote:Why don't they just give out one free curry puff per day for the first five years of every newborn infant's life? Problem solved!JR8 wrote:What to do, as they say?
I was thinking maybe a daily lucky draw for all parents of babies born on that dayLike 4D with babies...
Which means she would have probably had 4 anyway........ecureilx wrote:
She wasn't Chinese, btw .. not sure if that helped the "numbers" ..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests