It’s between a debtor and creditor. The creditor didn’t give any letter/call/notice to the debtor for the past 3 years and then later executed the writ of seizure. Items in the house were auctioned but the creditor was unsatisfied with the outcome of seizure, turned to debt collection company which harass, threaten, ransom etc (terrible ways, there is police report & witness). This case has been more than 6 years, now the creditor give a letter to demand for payment of more than $10k or else bankruptcy act will be issued to the debtor.
I sympathy the debtor

cos the creditor knew the debts were caused by his ex-husband but she’s the sole-proprietor. She did many occasions to talk to the creditor but they are really too much, executed the law but didn’t pay respect, interest of 24% pa, 1-time payment, a real bully I can say

. The creditor even told her they will accumulate the interests over the years and suit for bankruptcy once hit 10k. This maybe creditor's motive to keep silent for non-payment and then make a profit of interests (compared to bank rate of 0.125%). I never see this type of creditor, didn’t listen at all, use all means, persisted for more than 6 years for an est. comp. & the amount is small for an est. comp. Does Law only protect creditor? The writ charges & fees all bear by debtor (not fair right, poor still add more charges). Does the creditor need to pay for their act like threaten etc.? Can someone give some advice?
[/b]