One of my friend who is on PEP doing the additional employment as well.sundaymorningstaple wrote:That's what I said.
And another point - the minimum requirements are a previously drawn overseas salary of at least $8k, so why would someone take such a drop in salary?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Assuming he/she can clear the 34K threshhold then there is no problem. But, having said that, I assume that loophole will be closed pretty soon as they start to realize that there are those on PEP's that don't deserve to be as they cannot command sufficient salary to meet the minimum with a single employer.
PEP isn't just for overseas applicants. P1 and Q1 pass holder who have been working in Singapore for 2 years with a fixed salary of at least S$34k can apply.BillyB wrote:And another point - the minimum requirements are a previously drawn overseas salary of at least $8k, so why would someone take such a drop in salary?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Assuming he/she can clear the 34K threshhold then there is no problem. But, having said that, I assume that loophole will be closed pretty soon as they start to realize that there are those on PEP's that don't deserve to be as they cannot command sufficient salary to meet the minimum with a single employer.
I can understand that people might take a small drop for a different role, but 60% less? Bizarre
I stand corrected. I didn't realise that. I guess its looking for people who bring economic benefit and show commitment to Singapore......Saint wrote:PEP isn't just for overseas applicants. P1 and Q1 pass holder who have been working in Singapore for 2 years with a fixed salary of at least S$34k can apply.BillyB wrote:And another point - the minimum requirements are a previously drawn overseas salary of at least $8k, so why would someone take such a drop in salary?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Assuming he/she can clear the 34K threshhold then there is no problem. But, having said that, I assume that loophole will be closed pretty soon as they start to realize that there are those on PEP's that don't deserve to be as they cannot command sufficient salary to meet the minimum with a single employer.
I can understand that people might take a small drop for a different role, but 60% less? Bizarre
You have quit your previous job and come here with the PEP in hand. You have 6 months to try to find a job paying you 8K/mo. Might be few and far between that you are qualified for. So, you are now 4 months into your PEP in the first year. That means, a clued in HR Manager will know that your time is getting short so might only offer you say 6K/mo to start. That is 48K/year to start which means you will qualify to keep your PEP at least for that year. 5 months in and no job? Offer 5K. Can still meet MOM requirements at 35K for the year.BillyB wrote:And another point - the minimum requirements are a previously drawn overseas salary of at least $8k, so why would someone take such a drop in salary?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Assuming he/she can clear the 34K threshhold then there is no problem. But, having said that, I assume that loophole will be closed pretty soon as they start to realize that there are those on PEP's that don't deserve to be as they cannot command sufficient salary to meet the minimum with a single employer.
I can understand that people might take a small drop for a different role, but 60% less? Bizarre
Callput wrote:Damn! This thread make its way to Transioning.Org and I guess the new restrictions on PEP has something to do with this![]()
http://www.transitioning.org/2012/05/03 ... iple-jobs/
Such is the impact of forum discussions these days. If there is any loop hole out there, bring it up it this forum and for sure that loop hole will get closed soon
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests