Ahh such ignorance. You're confusing Gender (the socially constructed concepts of masculine and feminine) and Sexuality (the sex of the person you like to get jiggy with). You're probably basing your opinions of people you *perceive* as gay, because they are more or less masculine/feminine that your own criteria.x9200 wrote: I guess they are more feminine in many social and psychological aspects than an ordinary male
Oh George, this is not the ignorance, this is just lack of imagination and stereotypical thinking about the stereotypes. I just used the closest match terminology to avoid lengthy and rather vague explanation. And ehem, one of my closest friends in Singapore is a gay, the non-obvious type, so pardon moi but I guess if somebody is here biased that would be youcuriousgeorge wrote:Ahh such ignorance. You're confusing Gender (the socially constructed concepts of masculine and feminine) and Sexuality (the sex of the person you like to get jiggy with). You're probably basing your opinions of people you *perceive* as gay, because they are more or less masculine/feminine that your own criteria.x9200 wrote: I guess they are more feminine in many social and psychological aspects than an ordinary male
Gays are like wigs - you can only spot the obvious ones, or you don't spot them at all
Hahaha, I wondered if you would react to that!BillyB wrote:Hey Ritchie [sic], go and take your face for a sh*t......richie303 wrote:Maybe it's simply preference of the employee?
To be fair, I've never wanted to be cabin crew (they'd need to widen the aisles somewhat for me!).
Maybe it's due to the depiction that the job is "glamorous" and mainly women and gay men want to be glamorous? I don't know many straight men (aside from Bunter) that seem to want to be glamorous...
I agree though, never met a flight attendance who wasn't camp at least (who knows they may be straight and camp)
C'est La Vie!
And trust the ladies to have very good gay-darx9200 wrote:Oh George, this is not the ignorance, this is just lack of imagination and stereotypical thinking about the stereotypes. I just used the closest match terminology to avoid lengthy and rather vague explanation. And ehem, one of my closest friends in Singapore is a gay, the non-obvious type, so pardon moi but I guess if somebody is here biased that would be youcuriousgeorge wrote:Ahh such ignorance. You're confusing Gender (the socially constructed concepts of masculine and feminine) and Sexuality (the sex of the person you like to get jiggy with). You're probably basing your opinions of people you *perceive* as gay, because they are more or less masculine/feminine that your own criteria.x9200 wrote: I guess they are more feminine in many social and psychological aspects than an ordinary male
Gays are like wigs - you can only spot the obvious ones, or you don't spot them at all
I'll get back to you after I've plucked my eyebrows and shaved my balls.richie303 wrote:Hahaha, I wondered if you would react to that!BillyB wrote:Hey Ritchie [sic], go and take your face for a sh*t......richie303 wrote:Maybe it's simply preference of the employee?
To be fair, I've never wanted to be cabin crew (they'd need to widen the aisles somewhat for me!).
Maybe it's due to the depiction that the job is "glamorous" and mainly women and gay men want to be glamorous? I don't know many straight men (aside from Bunter) that seem to want to be glamorous...
I agree though, never met a flight attendance who wasn't camp at least (who knows they may be straight and camp)
C'est La Vie!
Point in case though right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests