Please leave the forum if you don't have anything useful to saysundaymorningstaple wrote:Oops.........JayCee wrote:Oops.x9200 wrote:
......just can't resist! Your masters is showing!
I don't think people who vote Democrat should be allowed to have maids. After all, having servants is 'exploiting the little people' is it not?Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:I just think if people can afford a maid and they treat her well, what business is it of ours if they have kids or not? Or pets? Or want to think they are rich? Or have to do a lot of entertaining? Who really gives a rat's ass?
I guess this is supposed to be a clever retort but the point of my post was that 'having servants' is not 'exploiting the little people' but I guess you missed that part.JR8 wrote:I don't think people who vote Democrat should be allowed to have maids. After all, having servants is 'exploiting the little people' is it not?Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:I just think if people can afford a maid and they treat her well, what business is it of ours if they have kids or not? Or pets? Or want to think they are rich? Or have to do a lot of entertaining? Who really gives a rat's ass?
No actually I hadn't read your post.Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:I guess this is supposed to be a clever retort but the point of my post was that 'having servants' is not 'exploiting the little people' but I guess you missed that part.JR8 wrote:I don't think people who vote Democrat should be allowed to have maids. After all, having servants is 'exploiting the little people' is it not?Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:I just think if people can afford a maid and they treat her well, what business is it of ours if they have kids or not? Or pets? Or want to think they are rich? Or have to do a lot of entertaining? Who really gives a rat's ass?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests