Well the trouble with just reeling of song names is that it would often require me to do to a youtube search to try and find them. As I have not heard of many of the songs in the other topic it is rather likely I'm not going to like them either (too high a risk of them being this weeks winner or loser of Pop Idol). Also as I haven't heard of many of the posters on that topic I have no idea of their nationality or age... which of course makes a difference to their likely taste. Hence, not a very productive use of time.x9200 wrote: What does?
For me any art related topic requires profound knowledge on the subject or it will simply be banal. How to discuss things like beauty even if it comes from sophistication? It can be liked or not only unless you are an artist (in the true sense of this word) and can express yourself on a similar level to the creation you want to discuss. I don't have the knowledge not to mention the later so I can only exchange some bio-/disco- information (what I don't normally do). More than such discussion I found useful just to listen to a favorite Internet radio, picking up the songs I like and exploring further the artists via youtube or similar.
I agree that writing a critique of a song or band can be banal. But I also know that I have friends who send me links to some of the most unexpected things that give great pleasure. Here is one example
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDHzK3Xe7Yw
Tractor song.
Now I'd never heard anything like that before, and it still makes me smile when I am reminded of it. Plus the musicians are very accomplished.
So you see when I described that Funkadelic track as like Shine on you crazy diamond meets John Lee Hooker. People who like either of the latter might like the former and give the link I posted a go, and they might smile when they hear why I picked those references. All that and no expertise required from either participant
