It is quite clear you really don't know much about China's economic system. Or military aggression. Or it's expansionist tendencies? Have you lately taken a look at China's ludicrous offshore territorial claims? Have you seen the huge build up in Chinese naval forces?oeloel wrote:Ha-ha, what? Communism? What is it?
I am shocked that your brains are washed to believe China is still a Communist country. Do you think a Communist country should have private companies, listed companies, stock market and private investment? China has rubbished the communism for a long time, although no need to announce it. Chinese people set much store by the traditional culture, not communism. What China is playing is the rule made by westerners--- liberal economy, investment, currency exchange, MNC, WTO, IMF…… It is not difficult to be an expert. It is better if you say it is a state-capitalism.
Maybe westerners prefer China to be a communist country, because they are confident to win it. However China won’t repeat the stupid things (planned economy, arms race…etc) which Soviet Union did.
Will China be a military aggression? I know there’s no such a gene in China’s culture. Let’s pray he won’t be infected by west.
Wake up, sons! (quote SE’s word).
nakatago wrote: And people, can we please just stop arguing the original topic? We're just doing OP's homework for him!!!
nakatago wrote: I have my opinion about the topic and as much as would like to address the points raised in the essay, I didn't because I feel that OP is pulling a fast one. Posting a very poorly cited essay in an expats forum? And when an American posts a contrarian view, he quickly resorts to a straw man argument? Then he later owns up he's doing an EMBA?
The Author had posted other political articles on MIT Online before.nakatago wrote: I find Maheshwari's essay designed to inflame Americans. He does have some good points but he also has a lot of bad points...his credentials is irrelevant to his analysis of China's and the US's history, economy and politics, given how he did his juxtapositions.
Am I missing something here? Could you confirm for us what the full name of your ruling party is called.oeloel wrote:Ha-ha, what? Communism? What is it?
I am shocked that your brains are washed to believe China is still a Communist country. Do you think a Communist country should have private companies, listed companies, stock market and private investment? China has rubbished the communism for a long time, although no need to announce it. Chinese people set much store by the traditional culture, not communism. What China is playing is the rule made by westerners--- liberal economy, investment, currency exchange, MNC, WTO, IMF…… It is not difficult to be an expert. It is better if you say it is a state-capitalism.
Maybe westerners prefer China to be a communist country, because they are confident to win it. However China won’t repeat the stupid things (planned economy, arms race…etc) which Soviet Union did.
Will China be a military aggression? I know there’s no such a gene in China’s culture. Let’s pray he won’t be infected by west.
Wake up, sons! (quote SE’s word).
China is still a socialist-communist entity when defined politically and ideologically.oeloel wrote:Ha-ha, what? Communism? What is it?
I am shocked that your brains are washed to believe China is still a Communist country.
You are the best proof of this. I do not know any other system that can provide that sort and this much of indoctrination. Ok, I guess enough for now. Everybody had his own purposes to participate in this discussion/monologue. I am doneoeloel wrote:Ha-ha, what? Communism? What is it?
I am shocked that your brains are washed to believe China is still a Communist country.
A. Just walk away.Manthink wrote:nakatago wrote: And people, can we please just stop arguing the original topic? We're just doing OP's homework for him!!!nakatago wrote: I have my opinion about the topic and as much as would like to address the points raised in the essay, I didn't because I feel that OP is pulling a fast one. Posting a very poorly cited essay in an expats forum? And when an American posts a contrarian view, he quickly resorts to a straw man argument? Then he later owns up he's doing an EMBA?
Okay. Let's follow along this line, but problem is I see is a stalemate has already develop in this thread:
A)
How to avoid helping OP with his/her "homework" in this thread, while at the same time proving his/her opinions are wrong without substantial online facts/reference/links ?
B)The Author had posted other political articles on MIT Online before.nakatago wrote: I find Maheshwari's essay designed to inflame Americans. He does have some good points but he also has a lot of bad points...his credentials is irrelevant to his analysis of China's and the US's history, economy and politics, given how he did his juxtapositions.
http://tech.mit.edu/author/Anurag+Maheshwari/
You might like to highlight your concern with its editors.
How to avoid helping OP with his/her "homework" in this thread, while at the same time proving his/her opinions are wrong without substantial online facts/reference/links ?
nakatago wrote:Just walk away.
Saddens me having witness the death of a potentially heated/factual/fruitful exchange in this thread.The Author had posted other political articles on MIT Online before. http://tech.mit.edu/author/Anurag+Maheshwari/
You might like to highlight your concern with its editors
nakatago wrote: He's a techie who likes to comment on politics. We can do that too, regardless of our backgrounds. His being a techie does not add nor take away from his political views. Also, I don't want to bother writing to the editors. Just not worth it for me.
probably just a brain fart that I didn't get to copy read. too lazy to check.Manthink wrote:How to avoid helping OP with his/her "homework" in this thread, while at the same time proving his/her opinions are wrong without substantial online facts/reference/links ?
nakatago wrote:Just walk away.Saddens me having witness the death of a potentially heated/factual/fruitful exchange in this thread.The Author had posted other political articles on MIT Online before. http://tech.mit.edu/author/Anurag+Maheshwari/
You might like to highlight your concern with its editors
nakatago wrote: He's a techie who likes to comment on politics. We can do that too, regardless of our backgrounds. His being a techie does not add nor take away from his political views. Also, I don't want to bother writing to the editors. Just not worth it for me.
Edit: I notice contradiction in your opinion about MIT author. But I allow to let this pass.
Your argument is non sequitur. I don't need to know Chinese to know about China's economic system. I don't know what you know about China, but given that you live in Singapore, you do have a wealth of opportunities to learn about China, which, by the way, restricts its own citizens access to information it does not like. 肉头oeloel wrote:Pooh! I don't know China? Do You know it more? Can you speak Chinese?Strong Eagle wrote: It is quite clear you really don't know much about China's economic system.
Can you reply me in Chinese? even in a simple word? Can you? 蠢猪
??Manthink wrote:I may have mis-read this statement, but it does neatly explain why some here continued to hold cold-war era perception about China and its system today.Strong Eagle wrote:I don't need to know Chinese to know about China's economic system
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests