X9200,
First of all, I love you as much as ever

I stayed away not because of you, but to keep the peace with other posters. And I haven't replied to your posts on this thread simply because there are so many points I don't know where to start. But for you, here goes...
The PAP has managed the economy well. I also personally like Lee Hsien Loong, and give him credit for not playing the politics of fear. This election is notable for the fact that people dare speak freely and openly support the opposition. If I lived in his constituency, he has my vote any time.
My constituency, however, sees Chiam See Tong standing as an opposition candidate. He has almost single-handedly represented democracy in Singapore for 27 years against all odds. During all that time he was a rare gentleman in politics and never said a nasty word against anybody. He is is sincere, humble, and inspires respect from everyone including LKY. He maintained and upgraded Potong Pasir with no funds from the government. For 27 years he met his constituents in a makeshift cubicle in a void deck because the government won't give opposition MPs a proper office. He cares enough about his constituents to attend wakes in his ward. He is a legend in Singapore because of who he is and what he represents. He may be old and stooped now, but because of him his constituents can stand tall and proud, that we (yes I grew up in Potong Pasir) did not succumb to materialism, threats and fear, but lived and voted as free persons with dignity.
Why would I not vote for this man? Singapore is better off for having him in Parliament.
I would also like to see one-third of parliament going to the opposition so that the PAP cannot make changes to the constitution for partisan rather than national interests. Changing the constitution to count votes at precinct rather than constituency level so they can blatantly gerrymander every election? Putting in place an elected presidency to prevent opposition taking over government then proceeding to treat the president as a puppet and refuse to co-operate when Ong Teng Cheong asks for a list of the reserves he is supposed to protect, then denying him a state funeral because he dared challenge the PAP? Applying the constitution selectively by refusing to let the opposition stand when they submit forms wrongly (James Gomez) or 35 seconds late (Tanjong Pagar team), while turning a blind eye when a PAP candidate (Tin Pei Ling) posts on Facebook on Cooling Off Day when candidates aren't allowed to campaign, then blaming her administrator even though on her election form she stated that she is the sole administrator? With the constitution being changed and applied with such loose license, what is there to protect citizens should a rogue leader or government succeed this one? Does it make Singapore a better or safer place to let this continue?
These two reasons, my dear X9200 whom I like very much, are why I vote opposition for this election.