
Hey JR8, FYI, most elections the PAP would be returned as the next government on nomination day, I have some friends who are in their 40's who have never voted before. That is why, this year is different.JR8 wrote:It took me until last night to realise the significance of this '82/87' issue.ev-disinfection wrote:This year is special, as there are 82 / 87 seats up for offer, so it is possible that the opposition parties together can become the next gahmen.
Share this with your local friends, so that they would think wisely before voting.
http://itcouldneverhappen.wordpress.com
I did not realise it means that in SG at elections some PAP seats are simply not contested at all. That is truly shocking!![]()
Viva the one party state!
And I was listening to an Indian, who became a Singaporean, and was excited to vote ..ev-disinfection wrote:Hey JR8, FYI, most elections the PAP would be returned as the next government on nomination day, I have some friends who are in their 40's who have never voted before. That is why, this year is different.
If they are not into radical changes they will never satisfy people voting for them (at least the majority).Addadude wrote:BillyB, if you read or listen to what the opposition parties are saying, they are not talking about radical changes. They don't necessarily want to fix what ain't broken.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/world ... ore&st=cseStrong Eagle wrote:Singapore elections are the front page story in today's International Herald Tribune.
My 2 cents? There is a big difference ...JR8 wrote:Like the ousted parties in the Middle East, they just don't seem to see that the game has changed until it is too late.
What have you been smoking man you're scaring me! America is all about Liberty, and yet here you are advocating the continuation of the 56 year old one-party state.sundaymorningstaple wrote:And that is the scary part x9200! If the opposition some how manages to gain control of the government (fluke but it can certainly happen) and they abolish the powers of the president and get their hands unfettered on the reserves, Singapore might die at the next major recession (and they are coming for sure). It's only because of extremely prudent management of the reserves that Singapore has virtually waltzed through the last 4 recessions unscathed. I dread to think what would happen here should that happen. I'd rather deal with the devil I know then the evil I don't.
I am more concerned about some populistic promises that probably would never be fulfilled so what kind of quality is this? Will they have any moral stand against the ruling party even if they get inside (regardless the intention of overthrowing or not)?Wind In My Hair wrote:Addadude seems to best understand the election situation. Almost nobody wants to overthow the government, not even the opposition. But we do want more opposition in parliament. 87-0 or 85-2 is not satisfactory for many people, especially when more and more PAP candidates are looking like duds and the opposition is presenting many impressive candidates. So you can all sleep in peace tonight. Or maybe tomorrow night when the results are out
I am surprised at the near hysteria of some of the FT here. You know, 'if the opposition win it is going to be Armageddon and SG is finished', that kind of thing.Addadude wrote:BillyB, if you read or listen to what the opposition parties are saying, they are not talking about radical changes. They don't necessarily want to fix what ain't broken.
Come election, the pussy cats turn into tigers, and then at the vote center, they think which way is the right way, and then tuck their tails in.JR8 wrote: I'm a bit lost for words but what do people who believe this think has brought about such an extremely swift and radical change? I.e. Why does one go from 2/87 to 44+/87 in 5 years? I mean as recently as a year ago in SG I detected no hint of this supposed tsunami of mood-change.
Yeah I have a friend like that too in the UK Army. He is a Major and surgeon not bad for someone aged about 32. He also did his stint in Iraq, but that is the deal you make isn't it? I happen to think the scheme the US military has to pay college fees for talent is a very good one and offers chances that some poorer folk would never have.ecureilx wrote:Come election, the pussy cats turn into tigers, and then at the vote center, they think which way is the right way, and then tuck their tails in.JR8 wrote: I'm a bit lost for words but what do people who believe this think has brought about such an extremely swift and radical change? I.e. Why does one go from 2/87 to 44+/87 in 5 years? I mean as recently as a year ago in SG I detected no hint of this supposed tsunami of mood-change.
I can quote a Singaporean PR, who gave up his PR, to avoid NS, and guess what he is doing in US ? He is the US Army, to ensure he gets his citizenship, as he found out that there is no other easier way, to get US citizenship + avoid the cost of his college .. which his parents couldn't afford .. and he is heading to Iraq .. now, if only he stayed back, he would have been forced to combat the ants and mozzies .. in the camps .. at the worst ..
And a lot of the Generation Y who moan about the NS and all know that .. atleast those I know ..
PS: were you here during the last election ? And the one before ??![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests