And it looks like the French people can see right through his 1 trillion LTRO (with their money) for precisely what he intended to be, a desperate measure to create an impression of stability in order to keep him and Merkel in power and running the EU for a further term each.JR8 wrote: The trillion euro LTRO, a Sarkozy can-kicking exercise for 3 years lasted 6 months. Oh crap!
edit: typoaster wrote:Euro is still doing strong on the markets,
Is that why the Swiss had to halt the exodus from the euro into the safe-haven ChF. And why safe-haven central London residential property is booming with euro-zone buyers?
it's a solid currency that will remain one of the world's main currencies.
I'm sure the euro will remain in some form, but a different one from the present. At a wild guess I'd say that the PIIGS will leave, and the euro will remain in the stronger northern economies. For example Spain facing debt funding costs of say 6% are simply unsustainable. Unless Germany is willing to start direct fiscal transfers to the PIIGS it is just a matter of time.
I sat next to German guy on a flight at Easter. I don't chat with strangers on flights (:)) but he started to. We got talking about the euro and I have to say I found his thinking revealing. At one point I told him that 'you cannot turn the Greeks into Germans' (which is what austerity and a stable future under the euro demands) and he replied 'Well you know, given enough time...'. He honestly thought the people and Greece and the other PIIGS could all be like upstanding German citizens. No 2hr siestas, no back-handers to the taxman. Talk about cultural imperialism and wishful thinking!
I told him that I thought the only way the PIIGS could stay in the euro would be if Germany directly subsidises them in perpetuity, 'Do you think the German people are willing to accept that?'. He did not reply. [By the way the German people are definitely not willing to directly fund the PIIGS, and it would be illegal under the German constitution, and the Maastricht Treaty].
Austerity will not make the PIIGS functioning euro-zone countries, it is simply intended as a route to limit further damage. There is no plan and no clear method by which the PIIGS could ever become functioning, or perhaps even successful, euro-zone members. That is precisely why the markets fell out of bed yesterday, Merkel's ally the Dutch PM got toasted by Wilders, and Sarkozy is on his way out in 2 weeks time. She cannot enforce austerity on her own (not that it would work on it's own even if she could). The eurozone's problem is not one of speculative attack requiring fire-walls, it is that it inherently cannot function as envisioned and there is no Plan#B.
Another comment he'd made earlier in the conversation was observing how the EU had led to an unprecedented period without warfare in Europe, and how it has brought Europe together. This is a very common and strongly held German view. Of course the elephant in the room is that the only country with a track record of starting wars in Europe is Germany itself. Then you have the irony that the euro, with Germany at the helm, is currently doing a pretty good job at destroying the EU.
Absolutely no danger of falling apart and disappearing.
Well, that is the PR-line from Brussels, but back in the real world it is certainly a fringe minority view.
The media are acting like clowns with articles like these.
Such a broad dismissal doesn't advance the debate. Which bit of the quoted one didn't you agree with? Are you saying the Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman is mistaken, and if so in what way, or that Greece will have no difficulty complying with the German imposed austerity?
They've been repeating the same jokes over and over again and frankly they're getting boring.
Again the broad dismissal leads nowhere. Could you please quote from the articles what you consider 'these jokes', as otherwise no one knows what you're referring to.
Kind of like ratings agencies and their comical attempts which had the markets reacting in the opposite direction.![]()
I think you need to follow the money, the vested interests. Ratings agencies certainly have those. But the Barclay twins, owners of the Telegraph, are lifelong Tories, and the Tories are pro-EU. So I have difficulty seeing how the Telgraph have a vested interest in publishing 'jokes' about the ails of the euro. Can you?
Oh, and didn't they just RAISE Greece's credit rating? Buahahahhahaha!
Yes. From Default to Junk, break out the Metaxa! But hang on, if you write-off that on which you were in default you're no longer in default are you? Yep, such is the sometimes twilight-zone logic of the credit ratings...
Well, part of the reason is because the Pound has gone down the crapper in recent years.JR8 wrote:And why safe-haven central London residential property is booming with euro-zone buyers?[/color]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests