Don't take it as a given READ the lease!nakatago wrote:We're going through the lease right now to use whatever we can. We really don't savor the whole moving experience as you all could imagine. We were too pissed off to do it last night.
I really hate the de facto set up for renters here in Singapore!
Good point. If they have the contractual right there is no need for them to offer to 'sweeten the deal'.k1w1 wrote:You know, I'd be tempted to call her bluff... Why don't you call the agent and "politely decline" the offer to leave the lease early. Then see if the landlord can come up with the clause that allows her to kick you out.
I may not bet the farm on this, but my guess is the agent got a higher paying tenant, and the relative of the owner is a phantom excuse ..nakatago wrote:I KNOW! We be reading it--that doesn't change the fact that her wanting to terminate the lease early still pisses us off.JR8 wrote:Still, reading the lease is 1.01!
Thats really bad. If you had rented the house fully furnished then the hassle is much much less. I would clearly refuse to vacate the house. Its not easy to get an unfurnished house and even if you get it, it wouldn't be much more cheaper than a furnished house.nakatago wrote:But still, we rented this place unfurnished, we bought s#!+loads of stuff and the really, really dislike the hassle of house hunting, overbearing agents and flippant landlords. Not to mention packing, unpacking, hiring a bloody truck and all that...
I actually don't buy the 'sold to a relative' angle--there were signs before. I may not be Batman but I have enough decent detective skills to put one and one together.ecureilx wrote:I may not bet the farm on this, but my guess is the agent got a higher paying tenant, and the relative of the owner is a phantom excuse ..nakatago wrote:I KNOW! We be reading it--that doesn't change the fact that her wanting to terminate the lease early still pisses us off.JR8 wrote:Still, reading the lease is 1.01!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests