Errrr..... to be situated along the ring of fire?earthfriendly wrote:"9.0 Earthquake
20 Foot Tsunami
1 Nuclear Meltdown
2 More possible Meltdowns
1 Volcanic Eruption
Stock Market Tumble.
What in the WORLD did Japan do to deserve all of this? "
patsy_sg wrote:read on someone's facebook page, I am paraphrasing, can't remember his exact words.... "why bother with them, did they think of us Singaporeans during the war?"
...and.... in the papers today, it's apparently a long term advantage to the construction industry....
tyianchang wrote: Seeing that earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis so frequently wreck the Japanese coastal regions, shouldn't they find safer alternatives to replace nuclear power? .
It's on file somewhere. Since imageshack is being a dick about linking now, my original facepalm graphic is as good as lost so I'm now using the ASCII equivalent.prkravi wrote:Nak, did you actually type the whole thing?
That's nothing compared to what happened at my workplace yesterday. We were waiting for a meeting to start and someone mentioned the Japan disaster and one of the people at the meeting is like "Oh my tenant is Japanese.." "Wonder if he'll be able to pay the rent now"... And then another local chips in with " You must ask him la is he paid in Sing $ or Yen then you can decide, and most people in the room were laughing. I was one of the few people who were not amused and I found the whole thing sickening.patsy_sg wrote:read on someone's facebook page, I am paraphrasing, can't remember his exact words.... "why bother with them, did they think of us Singaporeans during the war?"
couldn't decide if i was going to be angry or disgusted!
and.... in the papers today, it's apparently a long term advantage to the construction industry.... crass isn't it?
Some come to mind - like windmills and solar panels which are probably of limited efficiency. But in view of the might of nature's destructive potential, they have to seek out alternatives.Plavt wrote:tyianchang wrote: Seeing that earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis so frequently wreck the Japanese coastal regions, shouldn't they find safer alternatives to replace nuclear power? .
What would that be? Should a safer alternative exist capable of generating the nation's power needs, I am sure they would use it.
When the Haiti earthquake happened more than 200,000 people died. What did Haiti do to get that? They didnot even participate in world war II. Japan because of its economic might had it relatively easier. Had it been a poorer country could you imagine the kind of catastrophe that would have occurred?earthfriendly wrote:"9.0 Earthquake
20 Foot Tsunami
1 Nuclear Meltdown
2 More possible Meltdowns
1 Volcanic Eruption
Stock Market Tumble.
What in the WORLD did Japan do to deserve all of this? "
Goggle 'Atlantis the Lost Continent Finally Found ' by the highly esteemed Brazilian Professor Arysio N.dos Santos ( nuclear physicist, geologist, linguist ...) Download Amazon books for a free read on the Introduction label.ksl wrote:Sadly I believe they are underestimating the dead deliberately! A quake that can screw the nuclear plant's is one bad quake, the whole island shifted 2.8 meters apparently, That would indicate millions of people being thrown around. Though just on the east coast must be millions of people. I hate to think of the cost of life and suffering.
Apparently the lost city of Atlantis succumbed to a drowning fate over 2500 years ago, it is now believed to be found off the coast of Spain. Tsunami it is said, was responsible.
Niceintellectualsmuse wrote:That's nothing compared to what happened at my workplace yesterday. We were waiting for a meeting to start and someone mentioned the Japan disaster and one of the people at the meeting is like "Oh my tenant is Japanese.." "Wonder if he'll be able to pay the rent now"... And then another local chips in with " You must ask him la is he paid in Sing $ or Yen then you can decide, and most people in the room were laughing. I was one of the few people who were not amused and I found the whole thing sickening.patsy_sg wrote:read on someone's facebook page, I am paraphrasing, can't remember his exact words.... "why bother with them, did they think of us Singaporeans during the war?"
couldn't decide if i was going to be angry or disgusted!
and.... in the papers today, it's apparently a long term advantage to the construction industry.... crass isn't it?
Then I'm like, shouldn't you have asked the guy if his family's okay and stuff and I also reminded him of the thing called "Security deposit" and told him not to worry about his rent cause in that sense he has nothing to lose.
Valid points. The earthquake and Tsunamis of 2004 killed thousands of holiday makers to Thailand and many more in Aceh; mostly hard-working good people. That proves that deep in the bowels of nature, and it's taking us past Jules Verne's Journey to the Centre of the Earth kind of 19 century Victorian science, lie forces that are savage and ravaging; mighty enough to toy with human civilisation and show the drop in the ocean that we are.revhappy wrote:When the Haiti earthquake happened more than 200,000 people died. What did Haiti do to get that? They didnot even participate in world war II. Japan because of its economic might had it relatively easier. Had it been a poorer country could you imagine the kind of catastrophe that would have occurred?earthfriendly wrote:"9.0 Earthquake
20 Foot Tsunami
1 Nuclear Meltdown
2 More possible Meltdowns
1 Volcanic Eruption
Stock Market Tumble.
What in the WORLD did Japan do to deserve all of this? "
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests