x9200 wrote:@ksl ...but please go back to what franky-MS has written. It looks like we are talking about 2 different things. Otherwise, go ahead and check CoA for your vinegars. If you have them, you will probably see Iodine on the list of so called micro-elements. This is the I-127 isotope (majority at least). Now, that the fear and common belief (always easy to capitalize on) are already here you may sell the vinegar to franky-MS as all what's below is true:
- I-127 may prevent I-131 (the nasty isotope from the nuclear plant) to accumulate in the thyroid
- there is a risk of an increased exposure to I-131 as the result of the Japanese nuclear crisis (the extra dose would be probably less then from eating 1 banana but who cares).
And most importantly it will be ethical as you seem to believe too in the real danger here and now.
ksl wrote: I-127 is stable 1-131 as a half life of 8 days so are you are saying the vinegar is a better prevention because of the stability of I-127.
Taking I-127 in excess you simply reduce probability that the radioactive isotope will be used by the thyroid gland. It will reduce the uptake of Iodine because it will be already "saturated" with it. Half day life of 8 days indicates very radioactive material so a lot of damage and possible mutations.
And unfortunately it does not need to be vinegar![]()
One must consume the right foods for protection if no tablets are available, though isn't the problem on the actual dosage of direct exposure say 400
Only have to eat the right foods if no tablets are available![]()
Marine salt for example.
http://greenupgrader.com/14977/radiatio ... r-thyroid/
QRM wrote:Water supply? how about if something were to happen to Singapore's Gas, Oil, Petrol and food supplies not to mention the hundreds of thousand foreign workers.ev-disinfection wrote:.... if something were to happen to our water supply, then we won't be able to cope.......
Seems I didn't remember correctly what I read (which was some time agosundaymorningstaple wrote:It would appear that Japan IS self-sufficient in rice. At least according to this article (although some the data is a couple of years old.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests