Maybe a radical idea, but have you considered calling them up and asking them?wonderfullyboo wrote:Hi Mad Scientist! Thanks for your detailed advice! What is the difference between "striking off" & "closing a business"? I've already applied to "strike off" on the Acra website. Is there anything else that needs to be done?
Thanks again!
Striking off means done not by your own choice. Chap 11 or 13 is one way.wonderfullyboo wrote:Hi Mad Scientist! Thanks for your detailed advice! What is the difference between "striking off" & "closing a business"? I've already applied to "strike off" on the Acra website. Is there anything else that needs to be done?
Thanks again!
Honestly , I would think so. Legally means the court or the governing body can strike out your company from the register if you flout the law. Closing will be under your own accord. This is how I understand it.aster wrote:MS, are you sure those phrases don't mean the same? Because I've read that striking off can also be closing down the business on your own accord.
They mean the same thing. This is not the first time wrong information has been passed around by MS. You can strike off your own company from the registar and you SHOULD do so if you intend to close down your company.aster wrote:MS, are you sure those phrases don't mean the same? Because I've read that striking off can also be closing down the business on your own accord.
If you are on a witch hunt , go ahead and dance yourself. FYI I got this from the lawyer's mouth itself. MY earlier post suggested it should be the same. Rightfully so I said it.If you care to read what I said before this.pacads wrote:They mean the same thing. This is not the first time wrong information has been passed around by MS. You can strike off your own company from the registar and you SHOULD do so if you intend to close down your company.aster wrote:MS, are you sure those phrases don't mean the same? Because I've read that striking off can also be closing down the business on your own accord.
It is good to share but it is no good to share wrong information.
You really think I'm hunting on you, seriously? Ha! I didn't go to every thread to stick my nose in it. I only speak what I think is right and what I really understand. I do not speak freely or irresponsibly. FIY, Information - there is no S. You can't count information.Mad Scientist wrote:If you are on a witch hunt , go ahead and dance yourself. FYI I got this from the lawyer's mouth itself. MY earlier post suggested it should be the same. Rightfully so I said it.If you care to read what I said before this.pacads wrote:They mean the same thing. This is not the first time wrong information has been passed around by MS. You can strike off your own company from the registar and you SHOULD do so if you intend to close down your company.aster wrote:MS, are you sure those phrases don't mean the same? Because I've read that striking off can also be closing down the business on your own accord.
It is good to share but it is no good to share wrong information.
If I made genuine mistake I will be the first one to accept it,
Do not point fingers and accuse me of providing wrong information. I disagree with you on the company cheques and not wanting to continue the debate does not mean you can start with this line of attack.I still stand with what I said as my ex-accountant confirm me of what I have understood. We are a listed company although I am no longer with them, I have access to all these infos.
If I have provided wrong informations all these while then I must ask the mods and all those that I have helped in this forum and others the "wrong information" that have mislead them to their demise.
If rightly so, please inform the admin and mods remove all my informations since it is worthless to anyone here. Please inform them that from now onward you are the source of informations.
I will gladly accept this and disappear from this forum.
IF YOU THINK YOU CAN PROVIDE BETTER INFORMATIONS THAN ME , GO AHEAD HELP YOURSELF. CONTRIBUTE MORE RATHER THAN LOOKING FOR MY MISTAKES> THIS IS A PUBLIC FORUM>
Then you shouldn't have gone after another forumer like a rabid dog. As for as your other account is concerned, it's still active from what I can see. You haven't been banned so therefore you are operating with two nicks, whether or not you use them one after the other or interchangeably. There are regulars here who have had a least three nicks here. Still do I guess, but they aren't having their business link in their signature. What your intent is and what it appears to be to others is often two different things. I didn't go after you. I was referred to your signature showing up several places by one of our regulars. Oh, offense is a good strategy when called out. You will do well here as this country is noted for passive aggression. But it won't work here. As far as the past, it wouldn't have been brought up had it not been for the present.pacads wrote:
I didn't want to quarrel with anyone here especially this is the start of a new year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests