It not true, if you mention that smoking will damaged the cell. You should know who is Deng Xiaoping. He is a very heavy smoker till he older age. But he has two health kids. In other hand, non-somokers will produce 100% health kids?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Listening to OP's tirade, I suspect that an earlier replier's comment about bad seed is probably true. As the OP was previously a smoker, he's probably already damaged his reproductive apparatus as well as numerous blame cells by smoking and now is trying his level best to find some way to brain somebody else for his failure.
I am glad the child is okay now though, but listening to this guy, I feel sorry for her and anybody else within the household if he get's bent this easy.
So then the odds that Deng Xiaoping smoked around his house & wife were pretty high then, weren't they. This means she would have definitely had lots of second hand smoke. So, based on your warped logic, it kind of blows your whole argument out of the water then doesn't it. At least as far as your neighbour's smoking causing the problem. Still doesn't explain you problem though, does it.zhaowl88 wrote:It not true, if you mention that smoking will damaged the cell. You should know who is Deng Xiaoping. He is a very heavy smoker till he older age. But he has two health kids. In other hand, non-somokers will produce 100% health kids?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Listening to OP's tirade, I suspect that an earlier replier's comment about bad seed is probably true. As the OP was previously a smoker, he's probably already damaged his reproductive apparatus as well as numerous blame cells by smoking and now is trying his level best to find some way to brain somebody else for his failure.
I am glad the child is okay now though, but listening to this guy, I feel sorry for her and anybody else within the household if he get's bent this easy.
Your Judgement is little "No sense' sorry to say that. Do you think that you are out of point?
Yah but damn how gabment damn sue for make good for smoking. You see, no trouble wife say but ATP they smash ah. remember we are all like reed in wind. Sometimes we windy.sundaymorningstaple wrote:So then the odds that Deng Xiaoping smoked around his house & wife were pretty high then, weren't they. This means she would have definitely had lots of second hand smoke. So, based on your warped logic, it kind of blows your whole argument out of the water then doesn't it. At least as far as your neighbour's smoking causing the problem. Still doesn't explain you problem though, does it.zhaowl88 wrote:It not true, if you mention that smoking will damaged the cell. You should know who is Deng Xiaoping. He is a very heavy smoker till he older age. But he has two health kids. In other hand, non-somokers will produce 100% health kids?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Listening to OP's tirade, I suspect that an earlier replier's comment about bad seed is probably true. As the OP was previously a smoker, he's probably already damaged his reproductive apparatus as well as numerous blame cells by smoking and now is trying his level best to find some way to brain somebody else for his failure.
I am glad the child is okay now though, but listening to this guy, I feel sorry for her and anybody else within the household if he get's bent this easy.
Your Judgement is little "No sense' sorry to say that. Do you think that you are out of point?
Do you know what is husband and wife? you are total out of point. how you compare that husband treat his wife is same as an stranger (or call neighbour or outside?r). Do you want me to list out more points to make you understand???.....sundaymorningstaple wrote:So then the odds that Deng Xiaoping smoked around his house & wife were pretty high then, weren't they. This means she would have definitely had lots of second hand smoke. So, based on your warped logic, it kind of blows your whole argument out of the water then doesn't it. At least as far as your neighbour's smoking causing the problem. Still doesn't explain you problem though, does it.zhaowl88 wrote:It not true, if you mention that smoking will damaged the cell. You should know who is Deng Xiaoping. He is a very heavy smoker till he older age. But he has two health kids. In other hand, non-somokers will produce 100% health kids?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Listening to OP's tirade, I suspect that an earlier replier's comment about bad seed is probably true. As the OP was previously a smoker, he's probably already damaged his reproductive apparatus as well as numerous blame cells by smoking and now is trying his level best to find some way to brain somebody else for his failure.
I am glad the child is okay now though, but listening to this guy, I feel sorry for her and anybody else within the household if he get's bent this easy.
Your Judgement is little "No sense' sorry to say that. Do you think that you are out of point?
Well, I could say in my tiny voice, that your attitude here and social cohesiveness and capability to listen and accept suggestions shows - that you are such a lonely person who need an anonymous forum to vent your anger, and anybody who doesn't toe your line is in line to be punished like hell .,... andzhaowl88 wrote: Do you know what is husband and wife? you are total out of point. how you compare that husband treat his wife is same as an stranger (or call neighbour or outside?r). Do you want me to list out more points to make you understand???.....
If you really love your children and care about their health, you will quit or not smoke in front of them. That is the normal people thinking except those "special people". In other words, you will try your best to keep your child away those smoke....cos you yourself already sacrificing.JR8 wrote:Oh ok, if I'm following you then, it's ok if I smoke as that won't harm my children, but if my neighbour smokes then I'll sue him for damaging my child.
Do I have that about right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest