[/quote]Porkie wrote:I'm currently working in a consultant firm and attached to a contractor, however as the contractor appreciate my way of working and offered me a post in their company.
But there is a clause in my appointment letter with my consultant firm that we are not allowed to join their client's company for six upons termination of service, failing which the consultant firm will penalised us a six months' salary to be paid back to them.
Six what? Months? It is valid. Six years probably not.
Is such clause stated in the appointment letter valid in the eye of the law? If it is, then if my employer claims the all contractors in SG are directly and indirectly his clients doesnt it mean we have to change our profession just to avoid getting sued?
Indirectly normally is not enough IMHO.
You didn't send me a PM. I sent you one asking some questions. I know you cannot send me one, that why I asked you to just answer yes or no to the questions I asked in my PM here on the board.Porkie wrote:SMS, huh.. didnt realised i PMed u till u send me this msg? sorry, First time n day on this forum thingy. Btw, u mentioned avoiding cpf, insurance n etc... nope my current consultant firm didnt avoid any of these...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests