The walls should be left as new, or as they looked when you moved in. That is to say if you patched the holes up and just painted the holes over, the job would stand out to the naked eye, as a patch job, how can this be acceptable! The Landlord will have to repaint the whole wall, so the hole patches do not stand out for the next tenant to complain.lisalisadc wrote:Update: I got back 85% of my deposit after 24 days of haggling. The landllady tweaked about 1 hole, an unswept floor (hello, I mopped it 25+ days ago), and the shower. 85% of my deposit is better than zero and/or a trip to the Tribunal.
I did not repaint the whole wall, just patched the holes where the anchor screws were. The apartment was in excellent condition when I moved out a month ago. Very disappointed with the behavior and tactics of my ex-landlady. Shame on you, Singapore.
You really can do it the way it will not be visible. I do not repaint the holes and normally I use white cement for patching. Not knowing where the holes were probably you wouldn't find the places.ksl wrote:The walls should be left as new, or as they looked when you moved in. That is to say if you patched the holes up and just painted the holes over, the job would stand out to the naked eye, as a patch job, how can this be acceptable!
Yes quite agree, though not easy for the novice, or if they have a colour blindness problem.x9200 wrote:You really can do it the way it will not be visible. I do not repaint the holes and normally I use white cement for patching. Not knowing where the holes were probably you wouldn't find the places.ksl wrote:The walls should be left as new, or as they looked when you moved in. That is to say if you patched the holes up and just painted the holes over, the job would stand out to the naked eye, as a patch job, how can this be acceptable!
That is very simple, if you do not compare with a better Country, Singapore will never improve! I can see you have been here far too long, that you are fully integrated and have given up trying to contribute, sad, very sadsundaymorningstaple wrote:Why do we all tend to always try to compare with some other country's modus operandi when this is Singapore and they don't really follow any other country. Sure they started with UK parliamentary law, but it doesn't resemble any other law now. What's relevant is only was it is here, now.
That I could agree with, but unfortunately, that's not what people are doing when then compare.ksl wrote:That is very simple, if you do not compare with a better Country, Singapore will never improve!
I always try to improve my bad experiences with good ones, yesterday for example in food republic serangoon NEX...I ordered Fish & Chips price was 6.90 so when the fish was on the plate i was asked to choose 2 side dishes, beans and salad. That was it, I sat down not thinking at first I had no chips, so I looked at my receipt which clearly says fish & chips and 2 side dishes....So obviously i asked why no chips, and i was told the chips are a side dish.sundaymorningstaple wrote:That I could agree with, but unfortunately, that's not what people are doing when then compare.ksl wrote:That is very simple, if you do not compare with a better Country, Singapore will never improve!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests