Probably "Election" is over-blamed for every rejection. In the process of undoing their excesses, several have to face the axe. What keeps me wondering is how could my kid improve her profile in a year or two even if I re-apply again, that's funny and not worth thinking about.madura wrote:Elections? You don't expect them to spell that out, do you?
You just keep on believing that. Meanwhile, keep hoping your REP is renewed.smith a wrote:Probably "Election" is over-blamed for every rejection.madura wrote:Elections? You don't expect them to spell that out, do you?
smith a wrote:Probably "Election" is over-blamed for every rejection. In the process of undoing their excesses, several have to face the axe. What keeps me wondering is how could my kid improve her profile in a year or two even if I re-apply again, that's funny and not worth thinking about.madura wrote:Elections? You don't expect them to spell that out, do you?
Do you think rejections would go down after the elections are concluded? I don't expect any change in next couple of years.sundaymorningstaple wrote:
You just keep on believing that. Meanwhile, keep hoping your REP is renewed.
The rumour thing is interesting, I feign ignorance on the matter as I've not come across who renewed recently. Having purchased HDB 3 years ago, I might fit the "benefited" criteria.sundaymorningstaple wrote:There has been a rumour on the ground, (But at this point, that's all it is) that they will start asking PR's who come up for REP renewals to apply for citizenship. Failing which, they may not renew the REP or may limit it to 1 or 2 years. Hopefully it doesn't come to that, but at the end of the day, it's the PR abusers that have caused all the problems. Like taking up PR for themselves and putting their kids on LTVP's instead of PR as well. Can't blame the gahmen for cracking down.
ksl, I may sound paranoid, but I'm afraid visiting an officer might trigger the citizenship button, especially when REP is due. I'll see to get REP done before I do anything. Thanks for the advice.ksl wrote: Protocol is minimum 2 years don't forget! Bureaucracy is like that, doesn't make a great deal of sense, though I would request to discuss with an officer....it could well be that all people dealing with applications, reject everyone that do not meet the minimum time frame for PR, they may even press the citizen button!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests