the front lower chin guard and visor were also scratched and damaged in the accident...


my butt however... was very badly... "damaged"
my butt was destroyed as i was wearing very thin pants... one of my palms was also very badly injured along with other scrapes and cuts else where (elbows and knees). my feet were saved by my boots.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Hope you didn't do to much road burn.
sundaymorningstaple wrote:It's okay, Michael is obviously one of those people who would laugh at a Harley as well. Sure it's an anachronism or dinosaur, but cachet is difference than performance. I wonder how many 50 year old Ducati's there are still running like there are Triumphs & Harleys.
I'm not dissing the Ducati by the way. I think it's an excellent bike. But so were the original Vincents and Indians as well. He's like some women who will only carry a Coach handbag.
Don't worry Mike, just havin' a poke this morning. My favourite car is my old Austin-Healey 100-6. It's a brute, it's unrefined, lacks finess, is agricultural in nature (the engine is nothing much more than a tweaked tractor engine) and would blow 327 Corvettes off the road in it's day. (It was built from '57-60 when the Mk I came out).
Which do you think is the better chick magnet? A Golf GTi or this:
The Golf GTi will blow the doors off the A-H today, but standing still the A-H will cause the Golf to not even get a second glance, if it got a first glance at all.
Which would you rather have? An E Jag or a Nissan Z?
sundaymorningstaple wrote:Mike,
The A-H was "my" first restoration project as well. Subsequently, I restored a 1960 Merc 190SL Roadster and then my 850 Norton Commando. Shortly after the restoration of the Norton I came to Singapore (82) and around 88 I restored (not quite true - more like rebuilt as it was far from original in spec) a 66 Mini Cooper Mk1 here. That little car was an absolute blast to drive, especially coming the the country of huge chunks of iron in the front and the differential in the back and only a nut in between!Front engine and front wheel drive were something only the better off could afford in the US at that time. Oldmobile Toronado and Cadillac Eldorado and many decades earlier the famous 812 Cord. Real learning curve to driving that mini after being brought up on 396 Chevelle's and 442 Olds' and my land yachts - 72 caddy with a "small" block 472ci (7.7L) engine and current mint '92 Caddy d'Elegance (only 16K original miles from showroom).
Ah the Triumph Rocket Roadster, the most powerful of the Rocket III line-up, with a claimed 163 ft·lb (221 N·m) torque and 146 bhp (109 kW).x9200 wrote:Oh, clear![]()
I'am not that much into performance and sport bikes. Good if this is combined with the look but if not that I rather have something with moderate performance but looking good in my eyes. I don't think the classical bikes are an anachronism. They could be less practical - storage space for example, but the spots bike are not practical neither. Frankly I see more bikes in the current Triumph's stable that I like than in the Ducati's:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests