"Are you waiting for the holy pope?
That was what my four year grandson said today. One wonders what he means by 'holy' but it makes a good question.
The Queen's welcome speech lauded the pope's role as a representation of kindliness ( which is next to godliness) and the upholding of peace and love in democratic societies. But there were also protestors (as usual - what'll we do without our Voice of Conscience - as far as they're fighting the right causes ) about child abuse from the priests, right to abortions, gay rights, women's positions within the Catholic structure etc - all of which are very pertinent. The good pope indeed answered to all these questions and the signs were one of a religious leader loved by its followers of men, women and children alike. The blessing, hugging even, flowers, angelic hymns and golden chalice with the holy communion all looked indeed, ' holy.'
It was a reassuring, pleasing sight that that's what religion is about. I can similarly envisage Daoist and Buddhist priests so engaged with their followers. Seen in this way, is religion still the opiate of the masses?
It will be if each religion believes it's the only way, blessing only their followers but not blessing everyone else, believers and non-believers alike.
This is because believing alone does not equate to good person and is not a green card to heaven. Likewise all the rituals - it's all very yin and yang isn't it?
