Plavt wrote:anneteoh wrote:
If there is corruption, and I've lived there, it's not what the govt is aware of.



Plavt wrote:anneteoh wrote:
If there is corruption, and I've lived there, it's not what the govt is aware of.
JR8 wrote:anneteoh wrote: Who says I said there's corruption in SG? What kind of reporter are you to have come to that conclusion BTW?
Of course there is corruption in SG. Or is SG the one sole country in the world where there isn't?
X9200 is clearly not a SGn reporter, as no SGn journalist would dare report on corruption, not least because most media outlets are owned by the government.
Foreign journalists who might suggest that all is not quite adding up in the land of milk and honey are routinely sued into bankruptcy.
Funny you never read any reports of corruption then, isn't it?
nakatago wrote:Plavt wrote:anneteoh wrote:
If there is corruption, and I've lived there, it's not what the govt is aware of.
![]()
![]()
Well here is just one...EADG wrote:Haven't some magazines and newspapers, including Time, had issues pulled and disallowed for sale here for printing 'controversial' articles?
JR8 wrote:anneteoh wrote: Who says I said there's corruption in SG? What kind of reporter are you to have come to that conclusion BTW?
Of course there is corruption in SG. Or is SG the one sole country in the world where there isn't?
X9200 is clearly not a SGn reporter, as no SGn journalist would dare report on corruption, not least because most media outlets are owned by the government.
Foreign journalists who might suggest that all is not quite adding up in the land of milk and honey are routinely sued into bankruptcy.
Funny you never read any reports of corruption then, isn't it?
actually, he pulled a similar stunt against a former fellow man top dawg in the great white north (or was it an appeal? details very fuzzy) and the judge threw it out for being "trivial."JR8 wrote:As you say there are plenty of others, NY Times, IHT, WSJ (go on guess which individual has NEVER lost a libel suit in his life).
Don't know who you refer to, but could it be that it was not heard by his own judges, cough, I mean in his own country?nakatago wrote:actually, he pulled a similar stunt against a former fellow man top dawg in the great white north (or was it an appeal? details very fuzzy) and the judge threw it out for being "trivial."JR8 wrote:As you say there are plenty of others, NY Times, IHT, WSJ (go on guess which individual has NEVER lost a libel suit in his life).
canadiastan. fearing that the spooks will misinterpret all this (like they seem wont to do) and the party van may pick me up, I'm sending you a pm for more details.JR8 wrote:Don't know who you refer to, but could it be that it was not heard by his own judges, cough, I mean in his own country?
Thanks N, got it and replied.nakatago wrote:canadiastan. fearing that the spooks will misinterpret all this (like they seem wont to do) and the party van may pick me up, I'm sending you a pm for more details.JR8 wrote:Don't know who you refer to, but could it be that it was not heard by his own judges, cough, I mean in his own country?
x9200, I do apologise. I realised after rereading the post that you meant MS as for Mad Scientist rather than Ms! I guess I was inclined to think you were addressing the criticism to me regardless of the facts due to an initial experience I had had in this forum when the horrid guys were messing about with my posts. In this context, I , too was perplexed, as I thought you were one of the guys who positively defend SG as an exemplary model of good government. Hope this clears up your anxiety.x9200 wrote:Oh, I missed this one - thank you JR8
Anne, you and your issues again. Telling me about my literacy and not being able to make a logical sense out of few simple, plain English sentences. I am only responding to this creation of yours to straighten things up. Read it again. Use wet tissue on your forehead to avoid overheating of the CPU. Buy a dictionary. Look up the verb "to corrupt". In this discussion I am actually on your side of the barricade. Very uneasy feeling if you ask me.anneteoh wrote:I really suggest you read carefully re my own opinion of SG and get your facts right. And obviously, check your literacy levels before you get to talk about my mindset. What do you know. I wouldn't have that presumption even when I think I can place you with regards to personal profiling.LOLx9200 wrote:This is more general remark so MS, please do not take it personally.
What you've been persistently doing in this thread is proving something what nobody even challenged. Just opposite, I think I stated this like few times - many things are not done fair and you can not openly challenge the system. At the same time you clearly neglect to acknowledge that you, your mindset, mentality is very different from majority of Singaporeans. You judge the system and somebody feelings by your own specific values. If this is so bad as you telling why almost everybody wants to migrate here? Are Singaporeans free to leave or are forced to suffer under this "dictatorship"? Suharto, Marcos, Mahathir, are their nations enjoying the same wealth and wellbeing as Singaporeans? Am I missing something here?
Yes, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely but that's the point - I do not really see this absolute corruption in Singapore. I see limitations to the freedom but I also see a well organized and surprisingly well running socialistic enterprise and for this he has my credit.
I'm not bashing SG or its leadership, just trying to assuage the rumbling dissents - that's the gist of my reponse.
This summarises the whole point - anything can be misconstrued. I reckon in politics, people's literacy levels must be of a standard of transparent understanding or they shouldn't bother to participate discussing politics. Be aware that politicains have more clout to libel accusations or slander. Hence, it's trouble free to engage your interests elsewhere.
Who says I said there's corruption in SG? What kind of reporter are you to have come to that conclusion BTW?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests