SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Refunding of agents commission and the diplomatic clause
Refunding of agents commission and the diplomatic clause
All,
I am in the process of agreeing a tenancy agreement, and whilst we have no agents commission to pay, the agent has sent me a ltter of undertaking for my review / agreement that if we need to exercise the 12+2 expat clause then we agree to refund the commission paid by the landlord on a pro rata basis. Is this standard, should I (or am I obliged) to agree to this?
Any views appreicated.
Cheers.
I am in the process of agreeing a tenancy agreement, and whilst we have no agents commission to pay, the agent has sent me a ltter of undertaking for my review / agreement that if we need to exercise the 12+2 expat clause then we agree to refund the commission paid by the landlord on a pro rata basis. Is this standard, should I (or am I obliged) to agree to this?
Any views appreicated.
Cheers.
- sundaymorningstaple
- Moderator
- Posts: 40222
- Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
- Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot
I would say it depends on how badly you want the property. Is it a deal breaker for you? Him?
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers
While I agree with SMS, It does seem a very logical request to make. The landlord has paid for a 2 year income stream. If you leave early, then that 2 year income stream has not materialised and he will need to pay another commission to obtain a new income stream. Should it be you or the agent who is responsible for the cost? Debatable - but ultimately it is your choice as to whether or not to leave early.
- Mad Scientist
- Director
- Posts: 3526
- Joined: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 6:31 am
- Location: TIMBUKTU
Re: Refunding of agents commission and the diplomatic clause
Guyspfjonesy wrote:All,
I am in the process of agreeing a tenancy agreement, and whilst we have no agents commission to pay, the agent has sent me a ltter of undertaking for my review / agreement that if we need to exercise the 12+2 expat clause then we agree to refund the commission paid by the landlord on a pro rata basis. Is this standard, should I (or am I obliged) to agree to this?
Any views appreicated.
Cheers.
Correct me if I am wrong, OP said if he was to terminate the contract, the agent request to refund or pro rate the commission.
If this is the case, NO , it is not standard and you are not oblige. First of all the commission is between the agent and the landlord, you are the third party, under contract or tort if your TA has stated specifically third party liabilities albeit refund the commission then you have to adhere to it. If not, you are not liable, the agent is just wanting to compensate loss of income thru you.
To my understanding, commission paid is all up front after the TA is signed, refunding or pro rating it after the deal is not completed has no direct implication on you
The positive thinker sees the invisible, feels the intangible, and achieves the impossible.Yahoo !!!
- Mad Scientist
- Director
- Posts: 3526
- Joined: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 6:31 am
- Location: TIMBUKTU
Ok ,my bad ,I misread, yes I agree fair enough on both endsx9200 wrote:MS, to my understanding the agent has proposed an agreement to partly cover the commission by the tenant (under the mentioned circumstances). If the tenant (to be) agrees with it then he/she will be obliged. If not, then not.
I don't think neither it is a standard thing but I think it is fair.
The positive thinker sees the invisible, feels the intangible, and achieves the impossible.Yahoo !!!
Seems fair to me, and to my understanding, quite common, if not standard. After all, the dip clause gives you an escape hatch in the event of a premature bailing out of the lease by you. I mean, it may be outside your culpability, but you're still breaking lease.
So in return for this escape hatch, they request that you cover any costs that occur as a result of your premature bailing out.
So yeah, again, seems fair to me.
So in return for this escape hatch, they request that you cover any costs that occur as a result of your premature bailing out.
So yeah, again, seems fair to me.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Should I give a heads up before enacting diplomatic clause?
by sgexpat100 » Sun, 22 Dec 2019 10:23 pm » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 7 Replies
- 3712 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Fri, 28 Feb 2020 6:18 pm
-
-
-
Landlord has different understanding re the diplomatic clause
by kjstan1130 » Tue, 28 Jul 2020 9:35 am » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 9 Replies
- 4326 Views
-
Last post by PNGMK
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:07 pm
-
-
-
Exercising Diplomatic Clause - What will happen to subtenants?
by IsisIkutanin » Sat, 05 Feb 2022 11:29 am » in Property Talk, Housing & Rental - 1 Replies
- 1794 Views
-
Last post by singaporeflyer
Sat, 05 Feb 2022 2:45 pm
-
-
-
Diplomatic clause in Tenancy Agreement
by Voogster1 » Fri, 11 Feb 2022 9:37 am » in Relocating, Moving to Singapore - 2 Replies
- 2018 Views
-
Last post by sundaymorningstaple
Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:57 pm
-
-
- 1 Replies
- 2975 Views
-
Last post by abbby
Tue, 31 May 2022 1:52 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests