The UK has a Constitution? No, seriously . . .anneteoh wrote:Nick Clegg stepped in to defend the country's stand on personal liberty that's written in the constitution.
The UK has a Constitution? No, seriously . . .anneteoh wrote:Nick Clegg stepped in to defend the country's stand on personal liberty that's written in the constitution.
Check your own grammar which I noticed wasn't always quite precise.road.not.taken wrote:anneteoh wrote:This is a great abstract, fine for art but linguistically short of context. Don't worry about speaking up on errants of deomcracy -it's for the social good.It wasn't the typo, I'm nimble-brained enough to jump that hurdle. It's the lack of actual content without the framework of grammar that have me thrown.road.not.taken wrote:I read this three times and still have no earthly idea what it means
Should personal liberty be defended? Of course. Always. The Bill of Rights is there for a reason and are debated endlessly in the US, which is exactly what, I believe, the framers had in mind. As far as terror suspects are concerned, they either are protected by the Geneva Convention or Habeas Corpus.
No, but you do sound like you belong to the school of pseudo intellectual blathering boneheads, quite convinced that you make perfect sense, in some erudite fashion, when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer... able to string together nouns, verbs, adverbs, etc... and with a seemingly large vocabulary... but without understanding or depth.anneteoh wrote:Besides, I don't belong to the old struturalist school of linguists, so you can preen yourself out there, out of my realm of consideration. Boot!
Boy, you do speak like a politician when you use the referential 'We.' Seriously, do you trust politicains or reporters - everything being subjective esp in the present mutilcultural contexts?beenthere wrote:Hmm... Did I stir up a hornet's (or at least some buzzing insect's) nest?
Anne does have a point in her critique of my post - I was speaking mostly in the abstract with some thinly(?) veiled references. Ok, perhaps I was pushing some buttons to see what kind of a rise I would get. And the bit about dystopia? I just threw that in because it had a nice rhythmic consonance with pseudo-utopia.
I cannot speak for the UK nor can I speak for Singapor (at least not until I start living here). I have only been too these countries as camera toting tourists and all I saw was the gloss and not what's underneath the veneer.
However - as an American, I am seeing a continual erosion of civil liberties post 9/11. Some bothers me and some don't. I think each of us will have a different place as to where to hold the line.
Some are not necessarily erosions of civil liberties - more constraints placed on our day-to-day lives. As long as these are fairly applied and are based on reason, I may be amenable to accept them.
We Americans (like most other countries) do have a history where these "constraints" were applied most unfairly and targeting distinct ethnic/racial/religious groups.
From slavery, to Jim Crow laws, to the WWII Nisei internment, to pushing Native American to remote reservations, to mass detention of Mid-Eastern looking people post 9/11, to the now anti-Hispanic laws being enacted under the guise of stopping illegal immigrations.
Almost every nation on earth has a similar history. To America's credit it is sufficiently open society that issues like these are not thrown under the rug - and that we can and will speak up against what is considered unfair or untenable. Yes, we can speak up. It is when we lose the ability to speak up - our rights will be been eroded so much that we will have lost. No, the terrorists will not have won - we will have lost.
This 15 hours gap in our discourse makes it difficult to have a vibrant discussion - I should be in the same time zone in a couple of months to take up the cudgel more firmly.
My own grammar may not be up-to-snuff, but most can understanding the meaning of my posts. I believe Strong Eagle hit the nail on the head:anneteoh wrote:Check your own grammar which I noticed wasn't always quite precise. Besides, I don't belong to the old struturalist school of linguists, so you can preen yourself out there, out of my realm of consideration. Boot!
What's the term for data entry? GIGO?No, but you do sound like you belong to the school of pseudo intellectual blathering boneheads, quite convinced that you make perfect sense, in some erudite fashion, when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer... able to string together nouns, verbs, adverbs, etc... and with a seemingly large vocabulary... but without understanding or depth
Oops , here goes free abuse, (not free speech if you know what I mean).Strong Eagle wrote:No, but you do sound like you belong to the school of pseudo intellectual blathering boneheads, quite convinced that you make perfect sense, in some erudite fashion, when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer... able to string together nouns, verbs, adverbs, etc... and with a seemingly large vocabulary... but without understanding or depth.anneteoh wrote:Besides, I don't belong to the old struturalist school of linguists, so you can preen yourself out there, out of my realm of consideration. Boot!
If one person calls you and ass, you can forget about it. If a dozen people call you an ass, you really ought to consider buying a saddle.
You're a riot anneteoh!anneteoh wrote:You're a disgusting, prejudiced, racist unashamed to show your bias and your attitude. I'm just surprised that you're a mod here or anywhere else.Strong Eagle wrote:No, but you do sound like you belong to the school of pseudo intellectual blathering boneheads, quite convinced that you make perfect sense, in some erudite fashion, when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer... able to string together nouns, verbs, adverbs, etc... and with a seemingly large vocabulary... but without understanding or depth.anneteoh wrote:Besides, I don't belong to the old struturalist school of linguists, so you can preen yourself out there, out of my realm of consideration. Boot!
If one person calls you and ass, you can forget about it. If a dozen people call you an ass, you really ought to consider buying a saddle.
Say what you like - the psychology of racist bullies like you is well known today.
It's below my dignity to interact with you but I can't stop you spoiling my posts. Your criticism does not hold any water and smacks only of prejudice without evidence.
Don't worry, I'm impressed with your parts of speech and basic pedantry. You might be able to show off a bit if you can speak other languages or have some decent manners, yob.
Stop flashing your cheap mirror to get noticed. I'm not your decoy, you Asian women basher. Fly home eagle.
I don't assume I know everything; that's why I enjoy talking to educated guys with character.
Boys, don't be so suspicious or shock. Chinese is the most difficult language to master and thoughts are from the Mind which is beyond your ken. It'll be peaceful for everyone if you simply mind your own buisness and get on with sharing your own ideas, if you have any.x9200 wrote:Got exactly the same thoughts. Could be a nice PhD. project with the initial data set on semantics fed perhaps from some statues.Strong Eagle wrote:...when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer...
anneteoh wrote:Boys, don't be so suspicious or shock. Chinese is the most difficult language to master and thoughts are from the Mind which is beyond your ken. It'll be peaceful for everyone if you simply mind your own buisness and get on with sharing your own ideas, if you have any.x9200 wrote:Got exactly the same thoughts. Could be a nice PhD. project with the initial data set on semantics fed perhaps from some statues.Strong Eagle wrote:...when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer...
Tell that to Lineas and please stop quoting others but come up with something more original. Curry your favour somewhere else.road.not.taken wrote:You're a riot anneteoh!anneteoh wrote:You're a disgusting, prejudiced, racist unashamed to show your bias and your attitude. I'm just surprised that you're a mod here or anywhere else.Strong Eagle wrote: No, but you do sound like you belong to the school of pseudo intellectual blathering boneheads, quite convinced that you make perfect sense, in some erudite fashion, when in reality your sentences appear to have been thrown together by a badly programmed linguistic computer... able to string together nouns, verbs, adverbs, etc... and with a seemingly large vocabulary... but without understanding or depth.
If one person calls you and ass, you can forget about it. If a dozen people call you an ass, you really ought to consider buying a saddle.
Say what you like - the psychology of racist bullies like you is well known today.
It's below my dignity to interact with you but I can't stop you spoiling my posts. Your criticism does not hold any water and smacks only of prejudice without evidence.
Don't worry, I'm impressed with your parts of speech and basic pedantry. You might be able to show off a bit if you can speak other languages or have some decent manners, yob.
Stop flashing your cheap mirror to get noticed. I'm not your decoy, you Asian women basher. Fly home eagle.
I don't assume I know everything; that's why I enjoy talking to educated guys with character.
Of course you are interacting with SE, this is a forum.
An ass isn't a race, it's a species of animal.
You brought up your ethnicity and gender and Strong Eagle is home.
In the immortal words of Jack Nicholson: "sell crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest