Dear Lord save me from the eejits in charge of Oz.
A world-heritage site is the subject here. I can't imagine any government doing as little as Australia appears to have done to ensure the status of sanctuary to which the Great Barrier Reef is surely entitled.nakatago wrote:idjits are present in every country...for example those who voted against banning fishing of the blue fin tuna.
said tuna is in danger of extinction because of overfishing and japan lobbied against the ban because "eating blue fin tuna is part of their culture" (it should be noted tuna eaters all over the world could have settled for yellow fin tuna which is NOT endangered...yet). and i have no disagreements about preserving the probably largest organism on earth--the great barrier reef.ozchick wrote:A world-heritage site is the subject here. I can't imagine any government doing as little as Australia appears to have done to ensure the status of sanctuary to which the Great Barrier Reef is surely entitled.nakatago wrote:idjits are present in every country...for example those who voted against banning fishing of the blue fin tuna.
It's pathetic. It really is.
That's the good thing about ire, plenty to go around! Why would something have to be endangered to take it off the menu?JR8 wrote:Yeah but.... whales aren't endangered are they?
At least not the ones they're hunting.
Shouldn't you direct your ire at fish-species that are endangered? Swordfish, Blue tuna, Marlin.... you know
Sure they will, hopefully before the reef is damaged too extensively. Positive change is all around, but you have to work for it.~Yeah but they won't will they
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests