This is not correct. Over a longer time period the market has indeed grown because the companies in which a person invests have grown. Your comments may be true for speculative day trading, and I don't believe the rational market hypothesis but if a company does well and grows, this is reflected in the stock price.beppi wrote:There is no money generated on the stock market (apart from dividents which are usually minimal), just exchanged. So one person's gain there is always another one's loss.
To consistently gain more than lose, you have to be better than the others in terms of market knowledge.
Are you?
Simple statistics tell you that 50% of the participants are better than average, and 50% worse (and thus will lose in the long term). But 100% of participants believe they are better than average (otherwise they would not participate).
Why don't you gamble your spare money in a casino (where you don't need to pretend, since it's just pure luck), after keeping the essential amount in a safer investments?
Wrong!Strong Eagle wrote:This is not correct. Over a longer time period the market has indeed grown because the companies in which a person invests have grown. Your comments may be true for speculative day trading, and I don't believe the rational market hypothesis but if a company does well and grows, this is reflected in the stock price.
Well... yes and no. The relationship is direct and is clearly demonstrated when a company is bought by another. The purchase price (per share) is based upon the buyer's estimates of earnings, profitability, and the future, in other words, what does it cost to purchase a cash flow?beppi wrote:Of course there is value (and money) created in a company which is making profits. But none of it (or very little in the form of dividends) is distributed to the shareholders, and thus it does not directly influence the share price - only indirectly through the beliefs of current or would-be shareholders.
One thing is for sure... most professional money managers cannot do better than the market average... and most, particularly those with loaded funds, do worse than average.emed wrote:looks like you two are really veterans in this field. Do u guys have related seminars and talks to introduce to me?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests